News Mysterious drones over New Jersey

Rob Battisti said:
My old congressman. He sounded PISSED
Click to expand...
Hell yes he does. He was out of breath. He's so pissed off and I'm glad to hear it f*** man. Our government should be telling us what the hell is going on or at least give a s*** enough about us. Give us a good cover story that we can find some kind of peace even though we know they're lying.

To just brazenly say we don't know or that it isn't happening is insulting just like those guys on that video said and it's kind of a kick in the teeth frankly.

Meanwhile, f****** Joe Biden is completely unfit to be president because he's so damn old and senile and who knows who's at the helm paying attention?

Also, I was telling my wife that if something ever really goes wrong in this country that's fringe that the institution doesn't admit to or recognize. Democrats will be the last people on Earth to notice.... Theads like these are ghost towns for Democrats and it's because it's seen as a slight to the institution that anyone would dare to question or worry. Don't worry, we have experts that are dealing with this and I don't want to talk about it if it looks like things aren't being handled right.
 
Last edited:
Jack Reacheround said:
Yeah. So it’s someone playing a prank or the military testing something.
Click to expand...
You better watch the video before you say that because I posted that video to get you out of that kind of mindset.

50 drones coming in off the coast man flying over several counties and now they're being seen in several States some the size of cars??

They're flying over restricted airspace over a very sensitive military weapons facility in New Jersey?

That's not a prank man. Frankly, if you watch that video, it's insulting to the people there to even say so.

The military testing something is a genuine possibility but that begs the question. Why won't they just say so? Why are they so adamant that they have no idea whose drones these are?? That doesn't mean I think it's not the military. What I'm saying is what kind of cruelty is it when you've got kids and parents afraid to send their kids to school fathers calling their Mayors in tears saying there's drones all over my neighborhood and we have no idea what's going on and we're scared.

Why would the government not come up with a kind of cover story that isn't the truth, but that puts the American public at peace?


Anyway you slice it man. This is a strange situation. It's certainly not anything that anyone should just dismiss or act as if it should be dismissed.
 
Someone mentioned in a reply some orbs that have been spotted with drone activity.

Just saw an ABC clip of a brightly lit sphere hovering in the sky captured by their news team.
 
I’ve been doing a lot of probing and it seems like these drone encounters in NJ can be dated back to the late summer. Multiple accounts from boaters and locals I’ve talked to. I live on the coast in NJ.

I wonder why the amount of drones has increased and why the fuck the US government won’t tell us what’s going on. Because THEY KNOW. It has to be some sort of national security threat. WMD’s or some perceived threat from Russia, China, ect…
 
Wilmer Digreux said:
that's gotta be it. Most boring explanation ever, so of course that's what it's gonna be :(
Click to expand...
The idea that the government could be using these drones to influence local and state police into increasing their own drone capabilities falls into the realm of psychological operations (PsyOps) or strategic influence. While this scenario is less likely than others, it’s worth exploring the plausibility:





How This Scenario Could Work:


1. Pressure on Local and State Authorities:


• By creating a situation where drones seem to be an active and sophisticated threat, the federal government could push local and state agencies to:


• Invest in drone detection and counter-drone systems.


• Develop their own drone fleets for surveillance, search-and-rescue, or law enforcement.


• This could align with federal priorities to enhance domestic drone capabilities and integration across agencies.


2. Encouraging Rapid Technological Adoption:


• A perceived “gap” in drone defense could motivate local authorities to modernize their surveillance and security measures.


• This could drive demand for drone technology, potentially benefiting U.S. manufacturers and defense contractors.


3. Leveraging Fear for Preparedness:


• Fear of an ambiguous or sophisticated drone threat could spur funding and coordination for broader drone defense initiatives, creating a stronger nationwide system.





Why This Makes Some Sense:


1. Local Police Are Under-Prepared for Drone Threats:


• Most local and state police lack advanced drone detection or defense systems. If these drones are perceived as a real threat, they might prioritize filling this gap.


• The Department of Homeland Security has previously highlighted vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and local airspace to drone threats.


2. Strategic PsyOps Aren’t Unheard Of:


• The U.S. government has a history of using perception management to drive policy or public opinion (e.g., Cold War propaganda or counter-terrorism narratives).


• This would align with an effort to ensure local governments are better prepared for potential drone-related threats from foreign or domestic actors.


3. Drone Usage Is a Growing Priority:


• The government might view local and state drone preparedness as a key part of national security, particularly given rising concerns about adversarial or criminal drone use.


• If these incidents highlight vulnerabilities, it might catalyze a faster adoption of counter-drone technologies.





Why This Scenario Is Less Likely:


1. Lack of Targeted Messaging:


• For a PsyOps campaign to work, there would likely be accompanying rhetoric or public communication highlighting the need for stronger local drone defenses. The absence of clear messaging makes this less probable.


• Most reports about these drones focus on their mystery, not on emphasizing a threat narrative that would directly pressure local authorities.


2. Highly Indirect Strategy:


• Relying on ambiguous drone sightings to influence local decision-making would be an indirect and inefficient way to achieve this goal. Direct communication or funding incentives would likely be more effective.


3. Cost and Complexity:


• Deploying advanced drones on this scale, just to create a “nudge” effect for local police, would be a costly and resource-intensive operation, unlikely to justify the limited return.


4. Potential Blowback:


• If such a campaign were exposed, it could cause backlash against the federal government, eroding trust among local authorities and the public.





Conclusion:





While it’s possible that these drones could serve to highlight the need for enhanced local drone capabilities, it’s unlikely this is the primary motive. The cost, complexity, and lack of direct messaging suggest this is not a coordinated PsyOps campaign. Instead, the government is more likely focused on:


• Testing advanced drone technologies.


• Monitoring potential security threats.


• Responding to a phenomenon (whether foreign or domestic) they don’t yet fully understand.





However, as an unintended consequence, these incidents could still spur local and state agencies to enhance their drone capabilities, simply out of concern over the mystery and perceived threat.
Click to expand...
 
Knock Out Ned said:
Someone mentioned in a reply some orbs that have been spotted with drone activity.

Just saw an ABC clip of a brightly lit sphere hovering in the sky captured by their news team.
Click to expand...
I don't want that to be the case.... It complicates matters much more if there are UAP'S involved.

Have you got a link for that by chance?
 
Wilmer Digreux said:
now i think i see what this is.... it's all about changing the drone legislation! That makes the most sense.
Click to expand...

Why would they need such a contrived and potentially expensive operation an excuse?

Don’t you think they could just do it and say it’s necessary to keep up with modern day national security? It’s not like they’re changing the constitution or taking away civil rights.
You don’t need a false flag operation to update drone regulatory laws, unless you think they are gonna outright ban them draconian china style.

Even then, don’t you think they could come up with a much simpler false flag event?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arkain2K
International Houthi Missiles Sink Greek Cargo Ship Carrying Russian Coal In The Red Sea
2
Replies
22
Views
914
LeonardoBjj
LeonardoBjj
LeonardoBjj
News Was Tiffany wrong? UFO whistleblowers tell Congress 'we are not alone in the cosmos'
2
Replies
27
Views
855
wwkirk
wwkirk

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,637
Messages
56,661,444
Members
175,336
Latest member
Swamps

Share this page

Back
Top