B
bal541
Guest
6:00 - Banana, Workout
7:00
7:00
A good diet, as far as I can tell (and if you're actually sticking to it). But let's be honest, working out 3 days a week will not get you great results, unless you're training like mad on those days. And running a mile (much less 1/2 of one) is worthless...cardio should be at least 30 minutes if it's steady pace type stuff.
A good diet, as far as I can tell (and if you're actually sticking to it). But let's be honest, working out 3 days a week will not get you great results, unless you're training like mad on those days. And running a mile (much less 1/2 of one) is worthless...cardio should be at least 30 minutes if it's steady pace type stuff.
wtf are you talking about? Lifting for 3 days a week is perfectly fine for results...
If that's all you're doing? You'll have a hard time convincing me of that. I've never met someone who trained that infrequently who possessed any real level of fitness.
The 3 day split, as I understand it, is intended for people who are doing extensive sports-specific training throughout the week. If you're not already fit, you won't get much benefit out of doing so little training...your body's ability to recover, grow, and endure your workouts will not have been built up enough to give you much benefit.
This is from personal experience, so of course take it with a grain of salt, but I'm positive beyond a doubt.
Even if I wasn't doing sports specific stuff I doubt I could lift more than 3 days a week. Four would be the absolute max. With just lifting weights 3 days of squats, deadlifts, OHP, bench, rows put the hurting on my body.
If I was lifting four days a week I would follow the WS4SB template.
If that's all you're doing? You'll have a hard time convincing me of that. I've never met someone who trained that infrequently who possessed any real level of fitness.
The 3 day split, as I understand it, is intended for people who are doing extensive sports-specific training throughout the week. If you're not already fit, you won't get much benefit out of doing so little training...your body's ability to recover, grow, and endure your workouts will not have been built up enough to give you much benefit.
This is from personal experience, so of course take it with a grain of salt, but I'm positive beyond a doubt.
That is a good diet. But because it is good, the need for the multivitamin (and certainly two of them) begins to disappear as you hit the RDA of all that stuff just by eating whole foods. You should make sure that you are not getting more than 2500iu of vitamin a palmitate/acetate from those pills. (beta-carotine is fine) Also you shouldn't be getting any iron from them, because you will already have a lot from your food. We are finding out as time goes on that palmitate and iron are bad for you in amounts previously thought acceptable.
I agree with Chaseg that you can make progress on three days a week with a solid routine but in the first post you say you want to lose fat and in the next post you say you are trying to bulk. Which is it?
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. A 3-day lifting split not being enough!? This isn't a damn bodybuilding split. I would like to find any respectable strength lifter who says a 3-day split is inadequate.
Wow, lay off you guys. You'd think I stole your squat rack.
Let me clarify what I said. I agree that a 3 day split for lifting is fine to build muscle, IF you already have some kind of fitness base, and are doing something else the rest of the week. If a formerly sedentary person is doing a 3 day split as the totality of their exercise, I would barely consider them physically active. Their diet will be similar to that of a sedentary person.
And as to results, I tend to think along the lines of, "use it or lose it". Muscles need rest, but not a week of rest.
Fish oil instead of flax.
And 3 days a week is plenty.