• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

International Multiple Stabbing Victims at UK Children's Club UPDATE: 17 Year Old Boy Arrested, Not Treated as Terror Related

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 585708
  • Start date Start date
Locals in Southport have erected a sign on a bridge near Southport Mosque.

0_RGP_MDM_310724Southport_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Dork comments.

It would have been worse in the States with guns no question.

Hopefully no one dies.
You can drive a car through a crowd and do even more damage than with a gun. Should we ban cars too?
 
Last edited:
No. I don't need to prove that "no one from Southport was part of the protest", you need to prove that they were all from Southport, and the only reason they rioted is because a man was arrested.

The reason you need to prove that is because your assertion is, otherwise they'd have rioted earlier - which would only be possible if they were from Southport.

So, over to you.

Once you've done that you can explain how an actual perceived terrorist attack didn't incite a riot, but obviously an easily foiled one did.

Because that shit makes no sense to anyone but you.
You think the riots took well over 24 hours to get underway because people were travelling to Southport?

Were they travelling by horse and cart? The UK is tiny. You can get from the top of England to the bottom in just over four (4) hours.

And you do need to prove that no one from Southport was involved, as you've stated it.
 
You can drive a car through a crowd and do even more damage than with a gun. Should be ban cars too?

They have already done that multiple times in Europe. The worst one was a muslim who ran over a bunch of people at a parade with a big truck.

 
You think the riots took well over 24 hours to get underway because people were travelling to Southport?

Were they travelling by horse and cart? The UK is tiny. You can get from the top of England to the bottom in just over four (4) hours.

And you do need to prove that no one from Southport was involved, as you've stated it.

What? 4 hours from the top of England to the South coast? 😆 😆 😆 😆

Where in God's name have you "researched" this new gem? <lol>

And I never said "no one from Southport was involved", you just inferred that idiotically from what I said about the "people of Southport not rioting" which isn't nearly the same thing.

No wonder you struggle so badly to interrogate the nonsense you read. Is English a second language to you?
 
Imagine trying to downplay the arrest of an individual who turned up to a vigil for slaughtered children waving a knife and threatening those in attendance.

According to the article you have posted, a fake name began circulating social media on July 29. If this is what sparked the July 30 riots, why did it take a full day from then to kick off?

Would it not be more logical to assume that the riots, which started an hour after the foiled terror attack at the vigil, were indeed caused by that incident?

Why would they kick off after the police did their job correctly? What would they be rioting about?
 
Why would they kick off after the police did their job correctly? What would they be rioting about?


Perhaps @Croo67 can explain if this is happening because of an unrelated incident tonight? And which incident specifically?
 

Perhaps @Croo67 can explain if this is happening because of an unrelated incident tonight? And which incident specifically?
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?

Or are we still going with the horse and cart theory?
 
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?

Or are we still going with the horse and cart theory?

Because that doesn't make any fucking sense. Guy turns up, police arrest the guy, protesters attack the police.

What?
 
Why would they kick off after the police did their job correctly? What would they be rioting about?
Why is it happening in the first place?

Should we just accept it and hope that the police are always there to stop it?

They weren’t last week when the soldier was stabbed in Kent.

 
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?

Or are we still going with the horse and cart theory?

👇

Because that doesn't make any fucking sense. Guy turns up, police arrest the guy, protesters attack the police.

What?

👆

So @Croo67 why are right wing knuckledraggers staging another "Enough is Enough" protest in London tonight?

Is it still the guy that got arrested?
 
Because that doesn't make any fucking sense. Guy turns up, police arrest the guy, protesters attack the police.

What?
Didn’t the police also arrest the perpetrator of the attack on July 29?
 
Why is it happening in the first place?

Should we just accept it and hope that the police are always there to stop it?

They weren’t last week when the soldier was stabbed in Kent.


Protesting that would have made sense. Attacking police for arresting someone doesn't.

Anyone who knows the slightest thing about England knows exactly who those people rioting are and believe me they weren't there for a fucking vigil.
 
Back
Top