- Joined
- Oct 23, 2018
- Messages
- 13,585
- Reaction score
- 9,869
Last edited:
You can drive a car through a crowd and do even more damage than with a gun. Should we ban cars too?Dork comments.
It would have been worse in the States with guns no question.
Hopefully no one dies.
You think the riots took well over 24 hours to get underway because people were travelling to Southport?No. I don't need to prove that "no one from Southport was part of the protest", you need to prove that they were all from Southport, and the only reason they rioted is because a man was arrested.
The reason you need to prove that is because your assertion is, otherwise they'd have rioted earlier - which would only be possible if they were from Southport.
So, over to you.
Once you've done that you can explain how an actual perceived terrorist attack didn't incite a riot, but obviously an easily foiled one did.
Because that shit makes no sense to anyone but you.
You can drive a car through a crowd and do even more damage than with a gun. Should be ban cars too?
Are you actually slow?It's fine though because the people in this thread spreading misinformation are just aspiring scientists, right @Rob Battisti?
Just living in reality with statistics on their side.
You think the riots took well over 24 hours to get underway because people were travelling to Southport?
Were they travelling by horse and cart? The UK is tiny. You can get from the top of England to the bottom in just over four (4) hours.
And you do need to prove that no one from Southport was involved, as you've stated it.
damn dude that’s fucked up.FUCKING YOUNG GIRLS. Children.
No. Misinformation is harmful.Are you actually slow?
Imagine trying to downplay the arrest of an individual who turned up to a vigil for slaughtered children waving a knife and threatening those in attendance.
According to the article you have posted, a fake name began circulating social media on July 29. If this is what sparked the July 30 riots, why did it take a full day from then to kick off?
Would it not be more logical to assume that the riots, which started an hour after the foiled terror attack at the vigil, were indeed caused by that incident?
If the 17 year old were a white kid, we would already know by now.
Why would they kick off after the police did their job correctly? What would they be rioting about?
If the 17 year old were a white kid, we would already know by now.
Is that based on anything?
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?![]()
UK riots latest: Thousands take part in anti-racism protests; petrol bomb thrown at mosque in 'racially motivated' incident
Police are on high alert this weekend amid concerns over more disorder breaking out as protests take place across the country. In Northern Ireland, police are investigating a "racially motivated" attack on a mosque.news.sky.com
Perhaps @Croo67 can explain if this is happening because of an unrelated incident tonight? And which incident specifically?
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?
Or are we still going with the horse and cart theory?
Why is it happening in the first place?Why would they kick off after the police did their job correctly? What would they be rioting about?
Or you could explain why the riots only kicked off directly after the foiled terror attack at the vigil the following night?
Or are we still going with the horse and cart theory?
Because that doesn't make any fucking sense. Guy turns up, police arrest the guy, protesters attack the police.
What?
Didn’t the police also arrest the perpetrator of the attack on July 29?Because that doesn't make any fucking sense. Guy turns up, police arrest the guy, protesters attack the police.
What?
Why is it happening in the first place?
Should we just accept it and hope that the police are always there to stop it?
They weren’t last week when the soldier was stabbed in Kent.
![]()
Kent soldier stabbing: Counter-terror police helping investigation into attack on lieutenant colonel
The victim of a stabbing outside an Army barracks is a lieutenant colonel, it has emerged, as counter-terror police were confirmed to be supporting the investigation.www.telegraph.co.uk