• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

International Multiple Stabbing Victims at UK Children's Club UPDATE: 17 Year Old Boy Arrested, Not Treated as Terror Related

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 585708
  • Start date Start date
We've had multiple murders committed by children with their names not being released until after the trial and I don't suspect this will change here.
Did those instances result in large scale unrest?

They could instantly nip this in the bud by naming the Welshman.
 
Did those instances result in large scale unrest?

They could instantly nip this in the bud by naming the Welshman.

No but I still don't expect them to do it. I'm not saying they shouldn't but I don't think it's likely. The usual process has been don't name under 18s until after the trial and I suspect it doesn't change.
 
Well statistically the worst child killers in the UK were Thomas Hamilton and Leah Letby, both white Brits.
There are even worse ones than that historically. There are also way more whites and their history goes back way longer in the UK.

That said, if I was a betting man, and I heard of a stabbing attack on children these days, I would not put my money on white despite despite there being more of them.
 
It'd be a first. Thompson and Venables weren't named until after they were convicted and that was probably the most notorious incident of under age crime until now
They were also given new identities when released.
 
Well statistically the worst child killers in the UK were Thomas Hamilton and Leah Letby, both white Brits.

Since 2013, there's been a huge increase in islamic related terror in Europe, with several knife/blade attacks.

Islamist terrorism in the European Union[11]
201268
201301
201424
201517150
201613135
20173362
20182413
20192110
20201412

So it's not an unreasonable assumption to assume a muslim attacker when there's a mass stabbing event like this in the UK or EU.
 
Since 2013, there's been a huge increase in islamic related terror in Europe, with several knife/blade attacks.

Islamist terrorism in the European Union[11]
201268
201301
201424
201517150
201613135
20173362
20182413
20192110
20201412

So it's not an unreasonable assumption to assume a muslim attacker when there's a mass stabbing event like this in the UK or EU.

Any assumption is stupid when it comes to something like this.
 
I like to know the truth about a specific situation before I jump to conclusions about it. How can you possibly see jumping to a conclusion and being incorrect as a positive thing?
It’s called inference and likelihood.

If someone said “he is x” that’s wrong without confirmation.

If someone says “it’s likely he’s x” that’s based on statistical likelihood.
 
It’s called inference and likelihood.

If someone said “he is x” that’s wrong without confirmation.

If someone says “it’s likely he’s x” that’s based on statistical likelihood.

Yes but in this case given that we know the perp is from a Rwandan family, it's statistically unlikely that the perp is Muslim in this particular incident.
 
It’s called inference and likelihood.

If someone said “he is x” that’s wrong without confirmation.

If someone says “it’s likely he’s x” that’s based on statistical likelihood.

Problem is 'likelihood' is being determined by biased dimwits when it comes to social media.

And they don't say 'likely' they go all in then delete it when they're invariably wrong.

Sunrise, sunset.
 
Just base it off of statistics

The issue with that is the situation changes quickly and the gompers who decide "it's probably an Islamist" keep assuming that even when the perp is known to be Rwandan, and therefore unlikely to be Muslim, and the misinformation and false assumptions linger.

Which is more of a problem than people pretend when a bunch of flag waving knuckle draggers attack a grieving town.
 
The issue with that is the situation changes quickly and the gompers who decide "it's probably an Islamist" keep assuming that even when the perp is known to be Rwandan, and therefore unlikely to be Muslim, and the misinformation and false assumptions linger.

Which is more of a problem than people pretend when a bunch of flag waving knuckle draggers attack a grieving town.

Tbf I do think the legend of Billy Brick Bollocks almost made the riot worth it. People are going to be laughing at that for years to come.
 
The issue with that is the situation changes quickly and the gompers who decide "it's probably an Islamist" keep assuming that even when the perp is known to be Rwandan, and therefore unlikely to be Muslim, and the misinformation and false assumptions linger.

Which is more of a problem than people pretend when a bunch of flag waving knuckle draggers attack a grieving town.
Are you assuming a Rwandan can't be Muslim? Is that because statistically most Rwandans aren't Muslim? See how that works?
 
Just base it off of statistics

You could base things off reality.

It's a tough ask, admittedly. It might require people to actually pay attention to reality and admit when they are wrong.
 
Back
Top