Mueller's Patton the back (investigation thread v. 22)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I posted blasting the Ohr/Stone declassification, you responding with some long ass Derschowitz rambling about Papadopulous

No, I responded with a .gif of someone laughing at you, followed by a divider -----------------, followed by an article to keep my post on-topic. Watch, I'm about to do it again!

-----------------


 
twS0ICD.jpg
nice~
 
@BKMMAFAN , these guys have reminded me via the method of hilarious custom meme that I am still awaiting a quality response from you in response to my originalist/textualist takedown of Dred Scott. Your last response was not up to your usual standards.


--------------------------------


Jordan, Meadows ask Trump to declassify Carter Page docs

Congressman Meadows: In my conversations with the president and the administration, he has been very consistent on wanting transparency, and I have not seen a major pushback on this request as long as it protects sources and methods.

Congressman Jordan: Bruce Ohr had told the key people at the FBI that Chris Steele, the author of the document, was desperate to stop Trump from being elected. They knew that Ohrs' involvement---both Bruce and Nellie's involvement---in producing that document. They didn't tell the court that. Andy McCabe knew. Lisa Page knew. Peter Stzrok knew and Andrew Weissman at DOJ knew as well.



......

Host (Laura Ingraham): Can it all be declassified?

Meadows: Listen, the American people need to judge for themselves. We believe that it is time---not a month from now, not two months from now but days from now---to declassify this information. Based on non-classified documents, we believe we're going to see that information was collected in an abnormal way, it was verified in an abnormal way and it was prosecuted in an abnormal way all because there was a bias against this president.




<13>
 
No, I responded with a .gif of someone laughing at you, followed by a divider -----------------, followed by an article to keep my post on-topic. Watch, I'm about to do it again!

-----------------



I see so you had no valid response which is fine.

Your divider doesn't work well with a wall of text, especially from mobile. Just post twice if the subsequent post is of no relevance
 
I see so you had no valid response which is fine.

No sir, I already responded. You tried to "debunk" a news article. You wrongfully assumed that I endorse some narrative about that Russian whore. You should admit fault, but I won't hold my breath.

Your divider doesn't work well with a wall of text, especially from mobile. Just post twice if the subsequent post is of no relevance


I'll have to come up with a better divider. Thanks for your suggestion.
 
Sure but being left of the roll and other games is not the same as just not coming our because u did not like shilary. Down ~ 10% of black and Latino vote compared to Bama, how much of that was apathy vs suppression?
I think that's extremely hard to determine. But it's surely non-zero.
 
@BKMMAFAN , these guys have reminded me via the method of hilarious custom meme that I am still awaiting a quality response from you in response to my originalist/textualist takedown of Dred Scott. Your last response was not up to your usual standards.


--------------------------------


Jordan, Meadows ask Trump to declassify Carter Page docs

Congressman Meadows: In my conversations with the president and the administration, he has been very consistent on wanting transparency, and I have not seen a major pushback on this request as long as it protects sources and methods.

Congressman Jordan: Bruce Ohr had told the key people at the FBI that Chris Steele, the author of the document, was desperate to stop Trump from being elected. They knew that Ohrs' involvement---both Bruce and Nellie's involvement---in producing that document. They didn't tell the court that. Andy McCabe knew. Lisa Page knew. Peter Stzrok knew and Andrew Weissman at DOJ knew as well.



......

Host (Laura Ingraham): Can it all be declassified?

Meadows: Listen, the American people need to judge for themselves. We believe that it is time---not a month from now, not two months from now but days from now---to declassify this information. Based on non-classified documents, we believe we're going to see that information was collected in an abnormal way, it was verified in an abnormal way and it was prosecuted in an abnormal way all because there was a bias against this president.




<13>

What do you seek to accomplish by posting Faux News and Daily Caller stories besides causing people to conclude you're a clown?
 
@andnowweknow Come at me, fine gentleman.


Randy Credico: 'Majority' Of Mueller Testimony About Roger Stone | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC

Credico:

Testified three hours. Questioned by someone whose name starts with an "A". Focus was not Julian Assange. No questions about Wikileaks. Most questions were about Roger Stone. I don't know if the questions related to obstruction of justice. Got a letter from the Senate Intelligence Committee requesting his testimony.


Rest of interview is Melber just being the political version of Ariel Helwani, trying to squeeze answers out of Credico and failing.


 
What do you seek to accomplish by posting Faux News and Daily Caller stories besides causing people to conclude you're a clown?

If you're asking about Jordan/Meadows interview, it helps to balance out the wild anti-Trumpers in this thread who are ignoring possible impropriety at DOJ/FBI in the name of taking down their target.
 
No sir, I already responded. You tried to "debunk" a news article. You wrongfully assumed that I endorse some narrative about that Russian whore. You should admit fault, but I won't hold my breath.




I'll have to come up with a better divider. Thanks for your suggestion.
I didn't debunk the news article. I said the you and the article didn't even address the more important points. Which the judge obviously did yesterday.

I said you didn't read the government's motion which included a lot other pertinent information. But you, just like the media, grabbed on to the sex headline.
 
I didn't debunk the news article. I said the you and the article didn't even address the more important points. Which the judge obviously did yesterday.

I said you didn't read the government's motion which included a lot other pertinent information. But you, just like the media, grabbed on to the sex headline.

I never disagreed with your analysis.

I was amused that the MSM's narrative was debunked again.

Most people don't go as deeply as we do. They only look at headlines and narratives. I don't really care about Butina. If you think her story somehow demonstrates "Russian collusion with the Trump campaign", maybe I'll look into it more.
 
I posted blasting the Ohr/Stone declassification

If you're characterizing your own writing as "blasting", you might have an over-inflated view of yourself.

you responding with some long ass Derschowitz rambling about Papadopulous, what's the relevancy (I legit didn't read Derschowitz and frankly I refuse to, his intellectual dishonesty is mind numbing)

Ignoring views from the opposing side...in my view, this will limit your intellectual growth.

Also, you should start putting your political predictions up against other posters. That will give you a true understanding of your status. Many, such as @Limbo Pete, are too scared to take that first step. That's why I have more respect for @HomerThompson and @Jack V Savage .
 
But do you understand dred scott?

I think I do!

I authored a textualist/originalist rebuttal to Justice Taney's opinion in that case. I am still waiting for @BKMMAFAN to give a careful reply. He seems like a busy guy though, and his last reply was rather sloppy.

I am very amused that a misunderstanding of statements led to creation of a hilarious meme. I got an lol out of it. Thanks to @Tekk for making the meme.
 
Ignoring views from the opposing side...in my view, this will limit your intellectual growth.

I agree with this (though not as it relates to Dersch, who I think is arguing in bad faith). Who are some writers from the opposing side that you regularly read?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top