• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

Crime Millennial Couple Bikes Through Tajikistan Posts ‘Humans Are Kind’...They Were Killed

Okay. You're free to think what you want.

That's what you said.

Potentially. Any drastic change to a society's demographic will result in short time violence, but humans are adaptable.

So the Netherlands is just suffering a rise in violence for a short while and eventually will become more peaceful, even though it's becoming more diverse?

Eventually, there's a new normal and everything is fine.

A new normal? The normal being your country being a shithole because of third world mass immigration?

Unless there's some failed assimilation or deeply rooted ideological conflicts, I don't see why such conflicts would persist forever.

Those are some mighty big asterisks. Sounds like you're alluding to one particular religious group and their well documented integration problems everywhere they live as minorities.
 
This is a case of people doing something foolish to prove a point. Where were the friends and families of these two people to persuade them not to do this this?
They were not trying to prove a point. Are you blind?
 
Again, I ask, why is this a dup of a thread in the WR?
More importantly, why is the title being left untouched by moderators when it's blatantly false?

That was just a PISS POOR idea. I mean come the fuck on.Its not like you're riding your bike through Compton or Detroit. Your chances of being kidnapped or killed in a ISIS controlled area when you're a white american who happens to be visiting are 99.9%.

RIP though. Rough.
You don't know much about Tadjikistan or the general area there.

Darwin...shows up when you most expect it.

Oh so ISIS just wondered into that area and kill them?
Repeat point above.

See, I read that quote and think, “Hmmm... should have believed the MSM.”
Except that quote was NOT the reason why they visited and biked through Tadjikistan, a country deemed safe at the time. What's so hard to understand about this? Seriously, you're all either thinking on a frequency where facts just don't resonate or you're being dishonest.
 
Well, I'm sure that this couple would've appreciated a couple of these low empathy, psychopathic conservatives being around, when they were attacked by knife-wielding maniacs, unarmed, defenseless, hopeless to resist.

Love and compassion doesn't beat back ISIS.
LOL. Watch out ISIS! Repeat Sherdog ban accounts are coming for ya.
 
55149-Genghis-Khan-Quote-One-arrow-alone-can-be-easily-broken-but-many.jpg
To be fair this is said by a guy that conquered a larger landmass than almost any Emperor/Conqueror before or after with tribal people that were for the most part... well.. very similar. I always took the "many arrows" to mean just pure number, not necessarily diversity and shit.
 
I shit on them because they are extremely dumb. I don’t think liberals beleive you can hug the evil out of Isis. However, if you do believe that I will feel nothing when the unbelievably predictable outcome happens. I mean they rape and murder other Muslims. What do you think will happen when you go?
It was deemed a safe country by the US government and they weren't there to prove a point. They were biking like all of the tourists before them. Get a fucking grip.
 
Last edited:
LOL. Watch out ISIS! Repeat Sherdog ban accounts are coming for ya.
If ISIS ability to fight is equivalent to the vids I've seen of Iraqis and Afghanis trying to do jumping jacks....



I think Stephen Hawking could beat them in a fight....
 
If ISIS ability to fight is equivalent to the vids I've seen of Iraqis and Afghanis trying to do jumping jacks....



I think Stephen Hawking could beat them in a fight....

By all means, send off Bloodworth and TS and what are the other wannabe tough guy nobodies who can't seem to not get banned from a subforum specifically designed to argue? I won't miss them and neither would the gene pool.
 
To be fair this is said by a guy that conquered a larger landmass than almost any Emperor/Conqueror before or after with tribal people that were for the most part... well.. very similar. I always took the "many arrows" to mean just pure number, not necessarily diversity and shit.

That's quite right.

Culture and race doesn't matter. It's a pointless distraction.

Almost any great conqueror you can think of employed a force of multi-national multi-racial fighters to do their bidding.

The Mongols did not employ just tribals similar to them. They employed every single able bodied man that they could get their hands on between Inner Mongolia and Kiev. Chinese engineers, Islamic and Zoroastrian scholars, and Boyar's sons all bowed their head to the Great Khan.

In warfare these social distinctions are pointless.
 
By all means, send off Bloodworth and TS and what are the other wannabe tough guy nobodies who can't seem to not get banned from a subforum specifically designed to argue? I won't miss them and neither would the gene pool.
I mean, we all saw how quick the surrenders/losses racked up for them when they fought any sort of military or group that had a spine.
 
Ok technically it isn’t but it borders what country to the south and is fairly close to on the east

Why are you not responding to my entire posts? You only responded to a tiny parenthetical insert.

Do you regret calling these kids dumb for getting killed since you now know that they rode their bike in a place that has less terrorist activity against Westerners than many parts of the US? Can you admit that maybe you shouldn't have been so quick to ridicule their deaths?
 
That's quite right.

Culture and race doesn't matter. It's a pointless distraction.

Almost any great conqueror you can think of employed a force of multi-national multi-racial fighters to do their bidding.

The Mongols did not employ just tribals similar to them. They employed every single able bodied man that they could get their hands on between Inner Mongolia and Kiev.

In warfare these social distinctions are pointless.
We see it now too:


The conversations and insults you see in this clip, ANY OTHER ENVIRONMENT most of this country would be like "what the fuck is going on do they hate each other" I would imagine.

I would argue culture does matter to a bit of a point. You don't share at lest something like a small bit of culture like say... knowing what football is and the words to the Star Spangled Banner you probably won't fit in real well in the US military (just as an example) which COULD impact unit cohesivness and shit.

Granted, in Genghis Khan's time they were sophisticated for their time obviously but you didn't have to communicate with some dude piloting a drone 2000 miles away and shit though.
 
I mean, we all saw how quick the surrenders/losses racked up for them when they fought any sort of military or group that had a spine.
Emphasis on had a spine, I guess. If you think guys whose hobby is being an uninformed moron on the internet for years on end, and they keep coming back after being told plenty of times they're not welcome have a spine I don't know buddy. It's more likely they find they have more common ground with ISIS than with liberals and they join them out of sheer stupidity/cowardice.
 
We see it now too:


The conversations and insults you see in this clip, ANY OTHER ENVIRONMENT most of this country would be like "what the fuck is going on do they hate each other" I would imagine.

I would argue culture does matter to a bit of a point. You don't share at lest something like a small bit of culture like say... knowing what football is and the words to the Star Spangled Banner you probably won't fit in real well in the US military (just as an example) which COULD impact unit cohesivness and shit.

Granted, in Genghis Khan's time they were sophisticated for their time obviously but you didn't have to communicate with some dude piloting a drone 2000 miles away and shit though.


Guns and butter has shown to be clearly a superior doctrine to racial supremacy. See WW2 for an example.
 
That's what you said.

No, it's not. If you're not going to ask Gregolian to explain it to you, then stop belaboring this point. You don't understand what I was saying and you're not making an effort to understand.

So the Netherlands is just suffering a rise in violence for a short while and eventually will become more peaceful, even though it's becoming more diverse?

What do you define as a "short while"? I'm an American. We have seen several peaks and valleys of violence as a result of mass immigration and integration and such. After black Americans were freed from slavery, there was a period of mass violence against them from people who didn't like black people in their communities. Today, racial violence of that sort is rare and far less severe. Similar things happened with the Native Americans, with Irish imigrants, with Arab immigrants after 9/11, etc.

A new normal? The normal being your country being a shithole because of third world mass immigration?

Of all the countries that you would currently define as "shitholes" today, what percentage of them became that way because of mass third world immigration?

Those are some mighty big asterisks. Sounds like you're alluding to one particular religious group and their well documented integration problems everywhere they live as minorities.

It only sounds like that to you because you're dumb and you don't listen. You've repeatedly demonstrated and inability and an unwillingness to understand my posts.
I like debating. It's fun. But if you aren't trying to understand where I'm coming from, then you're just a troll and you're wasting my time. If you are unclear about what I'm saying, ask and I will clarify.
 
Guns and butter has shown to be clearly a superior doctrine to racial supremacy. See WW2 for an example.
There's a quote I read in a book once that if you were to ask an American GI in the European theater they'd describe the people as such:
- Brits were up their own ass
- French were cowards and smelled bad
- North Africans/Arabs were not to be trusted
- Italians were liars and thieves
- The Dutch were universally liked
- The Russians were not to be fucked with
- And the people they felt were most like themselves were the Germans as the Germans were the only one that felt running water was a necessity for houses and were the only civilian populace that would start picking up/cleaning the rubble up after the bombing stopped.
 
Ok technically it isn’t but it borders what country to the south and is fairly close to on the east

I hate to be disrespectful but you really are coming across like an ignorant, backwoods, doomsday bunker-building redneck who will say anything to try and prove his politics.

Perhaps you aren't aware; but affluent neighborhoods exist all over the world in close proximity to those less desirable. Even in the good ol' USofA you will find the rich and poor living contiguously with nary a highway or train track for demarcation.

And surprise, surprise... informed individuals do not declare the nicer areas as guilty by proximity.

We are blessed to live in a free world, so you are welcome to your views, but at least try to prove your point honestly instead of looking up Tajikstan on Google Maps and searching for the closest hostile neighbors to pass off as a "gotcha" moment.
 
There's a quote I read in a book once that if you were to ask an American GI in the European theater they'd describe the people as such:
- Brits were up their own ass
- French were cowards and smelled bad
- North Africans/Arabs were not to be trusted
- Italians were liars and thieves
- The Dutch were universally liked
- The Russians were not to be fucked with
- And the people they felt were most like themselves were the Germans as the Germans were the only one that felt running water was a necessity for houses and were the only civilian populace that would start picking up/cleaning the rubble up after the bombing stopped.

That's all well and good, but the people that worked together handled the people that refused help that was available to them because of racial biases.
 
More importantly, why is the title being left untouched by moderators when it's blatantly false?


You don't know much about Tadjikistan or the general area there.




Repeat point above.


Except that quote was NOT the reason why they visited and biked through Tadjikistan, a country deemed safe at the time. What's so hard to understand about this? Seriously, you're all either thinking on a frequency where facts just don't resonate or you're being dishonest.

How's about you go there and let us know how it goes...

:)

I look forward to the ISIS video soon after.
 
Back
Top