- Joined
- Mar 5, 2016
- Messages
- 7,310
- Reaction score
- 1
Just to be crystal, you don't think the cop's parting words were passive aggressive?
He is a cop worshipper.
Cult of the First Responder cuckservative
Just to be crystal, you don't think the cop's parting words were passive aggressive?
Should be more militarized and thus have a chain of command. We need a national approach to policing and an overuse of the current system which allows city police departments to be free of an oversight.
He is a cop worshipper.
Cult of the First Responder cuckservative
Just to be crystal, you don't think the cop's parting words were passive aggressive?
As a current Sheriff in one of, if not the most well known and high profile counties in America, who sits in on daily meetings with the Chief or Captain or Lt. of my precinct, we haven't gotten the memo yet to be more militarized. Funny huh? Actually what we go over is how we can actually better the community, to make sure we are obeying protocol, talking to people and not down or at people. Also have worked closely with LAPD and SWAT and pretty much everyone I have come across, while working or shooting the shit with has been professional. Not buttering you up or bsing you all here, but the media got you all shook. The ignorant morons who pretty much just stick to their own and live a kind of sheltered life in their own culture, aka a lot of BLM, are easily fooled by the media and think every problem in their life is due to racism and white people.
So no TS, the USA is not "furthest ahead", you are mis-informed and or full of shit. You're probably not even American and if you are, chalk another up to being fooled.
Policing will NEVER be perfect, anywhere. Wherever there is a human element involved, in pretty much any field of careers, there will be errors. Let a lone high adrenaline situations that involve peoples lives. Doesn't mean they are racist out to just kill a certain race of people. Think about how dumb it is at the thought police officers just wake up one day and go; "Oh shit, todays the day! I'm going to kill one of them coloreds!! Yeeehawwwww! Who cares if there are video cameras everywhere, I'm just going to be homicidal today due to my racisms."
Where's the passive part? They paid the couple's bill and informed them of it in writing, while noting they did so because of the obvious insult. Where's the element of non-cooperation or some form of stubbornness?
This is facetious right?
Haha GTFO. C'mon Cubo. The "Thank you of your support" reeks of authenticity to you?
Militarization is a word that the paranoid take out of context. We aren't about having something like the NKVD. What I am talking about is empowering the police and the citizens. The police need need gear, "more militarized" gear if you will. But you are crazy if you think the police will resemble anything like the military. What we need is an empowered police force but for that police force to be under the umbrella of something like the DHS. Not making it the DHS. But what I envision is having all major police departments being checked and held responsible to a larger board and that board will report to congress.
I also think only this approach can help end the systemattic racism and corruption found in many police departments. This can be done by making sure that all police departments follow new procedures and are monitored for corruption and systematic racism by a larger body and that body will report to Congress. I also, think having civilian oversight of police like say city councils is anot her way to keep police in check.
Is that part of the definition? Maybe you should establish one before insisting I agree with the specific term you're using to characterize these actions. For that particular remark maybe the term you're looking for is facetious or ironic?
pas·sive-ag·gres·sive
of or denoting a type of behavior or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the demands of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation, as in procrastinating, pouting, or misplacing important materials.
Unless they're walking around in stormtrooper armor all day err day, i wouldn't consider it really militarization. The apcs and shit come out for specific situations which is the way it should be.
Noted on establishing a definition...
Being offensively facetious is a means of passive aggression. Would you disagree?
I'd disagree.
Your definition doesn't read as claimed. You even bolded and underlined the "and" but. You seem to think that it reads like this.
1. of or denoting a type of behavior or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the demands of others
2. an avoidance of direct confrontation
I think it reads as requiring these things in conjunction. Especially considering that's how I've always understood the phrase.
Sorry for shitting on you so bad, peon. Deal with it you damn dirty 3rd worldling.Thanks for your input officer. Just wondering, did you have to take an IQ test to get hired, where they eliminate people with above-average IQs?
Also, a lot of cops used to be soldiers. And the rest of them that weren't soldiers wish they were. This is what you see.
Police should definitely be less militarized. They're rapidly becoming an occupying force and viewing us citizens as insurgents.The same agenda is being rolled out across all 1st and 2nd world countries. But it seems furthest ahead in the USA and particularly with regard to recent events. In the false flag Orlando event there were 3 SWAT teams who fired several hundred rounds IIRC, then in Dallas the police ironically sent a bomb robot to blow someone up.
UK police
![]()
US police
![]()
They are transforming what was a common law free citizens society into a brutal, totalitarian police state and using the good old false flag, ordo ab chaos, problem reaction solution technique to make the more naive among us request and support it. That's the way I see it in a nutshell. What do you think?