- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 8,740
- Reaction score
- 9,481
Yea, I was not there. You are right. There is a possibility that the woman who told other women she would get Mike to give her a baby, went to his hotel room in the middle of the night, removed her panty liner herself, received oral, and then proceeded to call him consistently after it happened in pursuit of a relationship would never get upset, be petty, vindictive when he plans didn't work.Your points don't make him innocent.
I have no clue if he's innocent or not, but you need to see the other sides perspectively everytime, acknowledging the possibility you may me wrong.
You failing to do that, when you have no clue what happened, makes you just as stupid as the people you're arguing with.
The events that happened prior and after don't correlate with an actual victim. Seems like a woman who thought she had a gold vagina and had delusions of grander and slandered someone out of spite.
Mike was a horrible human being who use to beat and mug old women and he's admitted to doing that and other horrendous things. I believe Mike was innocent there, but he was guilty of horrific things he never did, so it was karma. Mike was offered early leave if he admitted to doing this. He did not and served another year of time. Missing out on millions of dollars, his groupies, and his cocaine to hold onto a lie when he has admitted to other crimes doesn't hold up either.
Are we supposed to pretend the justice system is always right? While none of us can conclusively say what happened besides those two, SA victims don't pursue relationships with men who took advantage of them.