- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 7,697
- Reaction score
- 9,572
Because the casuals don't know the difference. When they marketed Punk-Gall, they didn't talk about how Jackson being a total can. They just talk about Gall being 2-0 with a win in the UFC; and it gave them footage of Gall destroying someone inside the octagon. Perhaps you weren't paying enough attention back then, but they were already marketing Punk-Gall before they brought Jackson in. To jog your memory, Dana "found" Gall on the second episode of his Looking for a Fight show. Mickey crushed a can and then immediately called out Punk. Everyone at the time knew the whole thing was staged. Then they brought Jackson in as cannon fodder for Mickey before the Punk fight.Why would they bring in an 0-0 guy to make Mickey look legitimate? That makes no sense. If they wanted Mickey to look legit they would have brought in someone better. Both Gall and Jackson were fighting for a chance to take on Punk. Gall was clearly the favourite, but I guarantee if Jackson had beat Gall they would have given him Punk next instead of Gall getting the fight.