• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

International Migrants 3.5x more likely to be arrested for sexual offences in the UK than British citizens

These are the numbers they couldn't cover up. The real number must be unfathomable if you factor in cover ups and crimes that never made it to authorities.

you can consent before the age of consent now ? or is the age of consent in the UK now 13 ?
I mean you can consent to anything at any age, it's illegal to have sex with anyone under the age of 16.
 
Ok but seeing as only 0.1% of the UK's population is a registered sex offender, that's one in a thousand, this means with foreign nationals it's 3.5 in every 1000, 0.35%.

That's not a very big difference. It's not even significant in much of science.

Then you have to think about the pressures on that particular population, the places they come from, you'd probably expect a higher rate due to abused people passing on their abuse to an extent etc etc.

I'm not making any argument for or against migration, I don't care about that, just the belief that this number is significant, which I think is probably demonstrably erroneous. It shows a lack of statistical nouse.
Is there a scientific term for this way of thinking?

“They’re only 3.5x more likely to rape your daughter than anyone else in society, and it’s alright because they were probably abused in their homeland.”
 
These poor young men are crying for help and are in a situation of sexual distress. European and American women should all offer themselves to a migrant once in order to help alleviate the tension. That would be a step in the right direction and a blow to bigotry and racists.

Them Euro and American women are just nationalistic and racist!!! That makes them members of the National Socialist Party!!!!
 
It links to the Telegraph which is rated as very right wing on MediaFactCheckBias and questionable credibility.

I prefer sources that are a little bit more impartial.


"Overall, we rate The Telegraph Right Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and some failed fact checks. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 12/06/2024)"

Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.4)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.9)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Can anyone fact-check the fact-checkers about UK freedom?
 
Ok but seeing as only 0.1% of the UK's population is a registered sex offender, that's one in a thousand, this means with foreign nationals it's 3.5 in every 1000, 0.35%.

That's not a very big difference. It's not even significant in much of science.

Then you have to think about the pressures on that particular population, the places they come from, you'd probably expect a higher rate due to abused people passing on their abuse to an extent etc etc.

I'm not making any argument for or against migration, I don't care about that, just the belief that this number is significant, which I think is probably demonstrably erroneous. It shows a lack of statistical nouse.

I think the 40x - 70x numbers of Germany is more telling.

This also requires both an arrest and a conviction... Seeing how apprehensive British Police has been at actually arresting rapists, this should also skewer the statistics.Then there is the whole kettle of fish of actually getting a conviction...
 
Ok but seeing as only 0.1% of the UK's population is a registered sex offender, that's one in a thousand, this means with foreign nationals it's 3.5 in every 1000, 0.35%.

That's not a very big difference. It's not even significant in much of science.

Then you have to think about the pressures on that particular population, the places they come from, you'd probably expect a higher rate due to abused people passing on their abuse to an extent etc etc.

I'm not making any argument for or against migration, I don't care about that, just the belief that this number is significant, which I think is probably demonstrably erroneous. It shows a lack of statistical nouse.
The original post refers to arrest rate, whereas the sex offender register only includes convictions where someone was placed on the register (you can be convicted of a lower level offence and not be placed on the register)

Conviction rates for sexual offences is around 4% of lower.

Also the term foreigner is misleading. That includes everyone including Americans, Australians, Polish etc. Anyone born here or given nationality is longer classed as a foreigner

The arrest rate of Albanians is 200 per 1000. 66% of all arrests for sexual offences in the City of London are a foreign national.
 
Ok but seeing as only 0.1% of the UK's population is a registered sex offender, that's one in a thousand, this means with foreign nationals it's 3.5 in every 1000, 0.35%.

That's not a very big difference. It's not even significant in much of science.

Then you have to think about the pressures on that particular population, the places they come from, you'd probably expect a higher rate due to abused people passing on their abuse to an extent etc etc.

I'm not making any argument for or against migration, I don't care about that, just the belief that this number is significant, which I think is probably demonstrably erroneous. It shows a lack of statistical nouse.

Excuse me? That's 3.5X more than the National Average... lol
 
Back
Top