MGTOW Channels Demonetized on YouTube

[panamaican]

you being too polite, i gave a very basic and boring argument



I would say so yes...



<[analyzed}>
that is some big BS right there. But i can appreciate your sophistry. 8/10

It's hardly sophistry. You're making a testosterone based argument, which by necessity must also include the positive and negative effects of testosterone.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Perhaps we should subscribe to a certain level of base respect towards all human beings,

I call that manners and being polite.

 

[TheGreatA]

I call that manners and being polite.

Which we often forgo in company where such manners and politeness are not warranted.

Such as here.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Which we often forgo in company where such manners and politeness are not warranted.

Such as here.

Sure, but as you said, "Perhaps we should...". I'm just saying traditional forms of manners & courtesy are out there at our disposal. Of course people won't always put them into practice.

 

[bad seed]

It's hardly sophistry. You're making a testosterone based argument, which by necessity must also include the positive and negative effects of testosterone.

The Salt-right is particularly conflicted when it comes to testosterone. They claim to promote trad-life and value raising healthy (white) families while insulting anyone who deviates from their accepted social norms of masculinity. Whereas scientific studies prove fatherhood lowers testosterone in all men because lowered T is advantageous in child rearing. I suppose they all imagine themselves as virile lone wolves impregnating the wives of cucks despite their empty social calendars.

 

[Satsui Ryu]

The FCC regulates content of most television broadcasts now, right? And telephone networks have long been treated as utilities, would not be a huge lap there, because these are essentially communications mediums.

Not sure where you're coming from with racializing this, but ok I guess.

It's not racializing. It's being facetious because most of the justification for banning someone is hate speech. Dont deflect.

And simply stating opinions on network television is not regulated. A media outlet can can shape the opinion that they put out as they see fit. It ensures that the Christian Brothers Network is not forced to have pro-homosexual content on their station.

Obscenity is regulated in certain areas, but there are always other outlets for that just like there are many outlets for social media.

Also, think of the logistics nightmare of managing the content of social media. There are literally billions of accounts on FB spanning across the globe. Does that mean every banning is entitled to government investigation including international users? A network channel is one entity and there are a couple of hundred at most.

And social media is not a utility. You can argue your cable provider is a utility, but NBC is not a utility. Just like perhaps the internet is a utility, but a website is not. They are treated as separate so as not to have things like monopolies.

Also you still have no addressed why shouldn't the market just determine what content goes where.

 

[panamaican]

The Salt-right is particularly conflicted when it comes to testosterone. They claim to promote trad-life and value raising healthy (white) families while insulting anyone who deviates from their accepted social norms of masculinity. Whereas scientific studies prove fatherhood lowers testosterone in all men because lowered T is advantageous in child rearing. I suppose they all imagine themselves as virile lone wolves impregnating the wives of cucks despite their empty social calendars.

"Empty social calendars" got a legit lol.

 

[Rusk]

It's hardly sophistry. You're making a testosterone based argument, which by necessity must also include the positive and negative effects of testosterone.

Well we can talk about the negative effects of testosterone but you are talking about extreme cases here, as you admit yourself:

Or, to take it to an extreme, wouldn't that mean that criminalizing violent offenders is, in essence, a war on masculinity?

you don`t give me much to work with here, so this is bs. I know it, you know it, anyone who reads it will know it too.

"excess fat cells produce extra estrogen, therefore promoting healthy lifestyle, in essence a war on femininity" if i would hit you with argument like that you would not even answer me, so dude come on...

"Low T appearance" sounds more like bro-science than masculine ideals to me. Especially as you were focused entirely on appearance rather than behaviour.
Yet again you're focused on appearance, a man that identifies as a woman is not the same as a man sticking up for women.
It seems to be all masculinity is about to you, so there's not much left to discuss.

Well there is not much to discuss since you keep misrepresenting what i wrote...

 

[EradiatedHaggis]

But seriously. You joined a group on the internet that sits around and complains about women. And you take this as proof that you HAVE balls? Really?

You are late to the game. I already made fun of someone for assuming that everyone against the idea of a group of people being targeted by Youtube must be a part of that group.

Please try again in another thread so you have a chance of not being a retarded bastard.

 

[panamaican]

Well we can talk about the negative effects of testosterone but you are talking about extreme cases here, as you admit yourself:



you don`t give me much to work with here, so this is bs. I know it, you know it, anyone who reads it will know it too.

"excess fat cells produce extra estrogen, therefore promoting healthy lifestyle, in essence a war on femininity" if i would hit you with argument like that you would not even answer me, so dude come on...

That only makes sense if I was arguing that estrogen defines femininity. But I would never take that position so it would never be an appropriate counter.

I took your position to the extreme to highlight the intrinsic shortcoming with the position of defining masculinity in terms of testosterone. As @Ruprecht accurately noted, you were making a point of using physical appearance as a reflection of testosterone and masculinity. If you're using such an extreme position to define masculinity then you're leaving yourself open to all of the naturally occuring extreme outcomes.

 

[K1levelgrappler]

MGTOW are dickless losers and not actual men so this can't be part of the war on men. The war on eunuchs maybe?

 

[Darkballs]

You are late to the game. I already made fun of someone for assuming that everyone against the idea of a group of people being targeted by Youtube must be a part of that group.

Please try again in another thread so you have a chance of not being a retarded bastard.

You weren't defending their objection to being demonetized by Youtube, you were saying that their terrible fear of women was due to them "not having surrendered their balls."

I'm was asking, rather clearly, how you equate membership in group that exists to do nothing more than obfuscate their inability to get laid, with having balls.

 

[Rhood]

MGTOW is really just a counter to feminist brainwashing of western women and the Disney induced media that broadcasts notions of treating all women like princesses that could never be disrespectfully evil, selfish, or grow up to be gold diggers because they are too innocent to be like that.

The video's are just anti-feminist and anti-Disney material explaining honest truths behind actions here and there, but for some reason people on sherdog seem to hate that.

I feel like I'm living in the Twilight Zone
MGITZ?

 

[calavera2]

MGTOW is really just a counter to feminist brainwashing of western women and the Disney induced media that broadcasts notions of treating all women like princesses that could never be disrespectfully evil, selfish, or grow up to be gold diggers because they are too innocent to be like that.

The video's are just anti-feminist and anti-Disney material explaining honest truths behind actions here and there, but for some reason people on sherdog seem to hate that.

I feel like I'm living in the Twilight Zone
MGITZ?

I disagree...its more like a reaction to the failure of men to live up to Disney white night standard. They are anti-feminist and anti-disney in that they cannot live up to the male standard of a Disney character so they reject it all in their failure to be a Disney prince.

 

[Joe265]

The war on men continues. Literally nothing offensive or against the guidelines and they’re demonitizing them anyway.

I’m not MGTOW but they’re associated more so with right than left wingers so it’s just another political attack by YT.

The war was already lost if this is making you react fearfully.

 

[Sketch]

That only makes sense if I was arguing that estrogen defines femininity. But I would never take that position so it would never be an appropriate counter.

I took your position to the extreme to highlight the intrinsic shortcoming with the position of defining masculinity in terms of testosterone. As @Ruprecht accurately noted, you were making a point of using physical appearance as a reflection of testosterone and masculinity. If you're using such an extreme position to define masculinity then you're leaving yourself open to all of the naturally occuring extreme outcomes.

What are you talking about? Shoulder width, jaw size, brow ridge etc are all proper indicators of testosterone. Somebody's physically appearance can be very telling about their testosterone levels.

 

[vengeful]

lol @ MGTOW....if that ain't a gay club, I don't know what is.

 

[VivaRevolution]

So does it make anyone ashamed that Joe Rogan has a higher level of debate over this, then this forum does?

How does it make you feel, that the media has done you such a disservice in educating the public, that most people think this is about whether YouTube as a private company has a right to refuse service.

That is certainly part of the argument, but it is amazing that I never hear the counter to this. Which is that social media is like a untility. It serves a essential public service. The gas company can't turn off your gas because you are pro or anti gun control.

If social media is a utility, they don't have a right to refuse service.

So here is the actual debate without kindergarten MSM shit flinging, and dumbing down of the populace.

Is social media a utility?

 

[Ruprecht]

So does it make anyone ashamed that Joe Rogan has a higher level of debate over this, then this forum does?

How does it make you feel, that the media has done you such a disservice in educating the public, that most people think this is about whether YouTube as a private company has a right to refuse service.

That is certainly part of the argument, but it is amazing that I never hear the counter to this. Which is that social media is like a untility. It serves a essential public service. The gas company can't turn off your gas because you are pro or anti gun control.

If social media is a utility, they don't have a right to refuse service.

So here is the actual debate without kindergarten MSM shit flinging, and dumbing down of the populace.

Is social media a utility?

Actually that was already brought up in this thread, and no it's not a utility. The internet is a utility, applications and online services definitely aren't.
You could treat it as such of course, but that would create balkanisation (as we already see with nations like China that implement government control over online services), cement monopolies and strangle innovation (currently the technology and implementations are evolving quicker than legislation can adapt)..

 

[VivaRevolution]

Actually that was already brought up in this thread, and no it's not a utility. The internet is a utility, applications and online services definitely aren't.
You could treat it as such of course, but that would create balkanisation (as we already see with nations like China that implement government control over online services), cement monopolies and strangle innovation (currently the technology and implementations are evolving quicker than legislation can adapt)..

Why isn't social media a utility?

What differentiates YouTube and Comcast?