MGTOW Channels Demonetized on YouTube

[7437]

Remember what happened to Breitbart? They lost what made them relevant to those advertisers and what would generate viewers.

People aren't going to stop going to youtube, period. No amount of Ru.tube or Dailymotion is going to change youtube's position as the #1 video streaming site.

YouTube doesn't give a fuck if you watch them or not. Not the tiniest bit. They want advertiser money. That is there 1 and only goal. If you might upset an advertiser, then you dont get any money. It's that simple. You dont even have to upset them, YouTube wants to keep its customers happy and works yo make sure that they are.

The customer being advertisers. Dont get it turned around. Users are the product. You are the product. No one gives a fuck if the product feels butthurt.

 

[orangecuse]

Incels, MGTOW, culty Peterson followers are as beta as it gets. All of this stuff is like a group hug for these bitter confused "men" who feel useless, under attack and unworthy.

If this stuff eased their bitterness and insecurities some it would be more tolerable. But it's essentially a group hug for betas that in the end just isolates them more, reinforces their lonely irritated mindset and makes them even more bitter.

 

[machidafan99]

I wonder what kind of commercials run on mgtow channels outside of prepper & bitcoin stuff.

 

[A_bomb47]

I wonder what kind of commercials run on mgtow channels outside of prepper & bitcoin stuff.

My guess would be video games. Especially shooters like call of duty.

 

[Bamboozled]

YouTube doesn't give a fuck if you watch them or not. Not the tiniest bit. They want advertiser money. That is there 1 and only goal. If you might upset an advertiser, then you dont get any money. It's that simple. You dont even have to upset them, YouTube wants to keep its customers happy and works yo make sure that they are.

The customer being advertisers. Dont get it turned around. Users are the product. You are the product. No one gives a fuck if the product feels butthurt.

If they didn't give a fuck they wouldn't have advertisers.They even now have a streaming medium you can pay to watch regular TV programming. They fucking care.

 

[tonni]

Now how are they going to pay their child support? it's not a joke

 

[EradiatedHaggis]

Ah. So men who spend all day complaining about not getting laid, are actually plowing our women all the time?

You need to think your insults through a little more.

Who complains about not getting laid all day? Not MGTOW...you clearly dont know what MGTOW even is. Most of those on Youtube with a large following are all dating and laugh at people that get married for being fools or are divorced and dating.

Their universal thought is that MARRIAGE is for fools and being locked into being with one person is for fools, not dating or having sex.

Also...funny how everyone that was targetting me continued posting here all weekend going on about how others are losers that cant get laid.

 

[Trotsky]

"Men going their own way". They're basically incels (involuntary celibates) who are too self conscious about the the incel label. So they made up a new one.

THANK YOU. Went the whole first page without anyone explaining the acronym, and I wasn't going to google that sad shit at work.

 

[SammyPops]

Private business can do this.

 

[badascan]

Watch your step... And what others steps... Reads like a psyop...

 

[Darkballs]

Who complains about not getting laid all day? Not MGTOW...you clearly dont know what MGTOW even is.

We are all aware that members of whatever current acronym is trendy, who spend a significant portion of their time online complaining about women, would like us to believe that somehow it's because they are just too busy nailing all of them.

But no one believes them.

 

[EradiatedHaggis]

We are all aware that members of whatever current acronym is trendy, who spend a significant portion of their time online complaining about women, would like us to believe that somehow it's because they are just too busy nailing all of them.

But no one believes them.

Hmm, whom to believe, the people making videos (of themselves) some of which have differing women with them agreeing with them or the Shertard clique that posts anonymously all day on even on the weekends...

 

[panamaican]

Hmm, whom to believe, the people making videos (of themselves) some of which have differing women with them agreeing with them or the Shertard clique that posts anonymously all day on even on the weekends...

You mean like that guy who made a video explaining how women are fools and guys shouldn't be cucks and stuff...right after he got dumped by a single mom he was dating and playing daddy to her kid?

How about you don't believe people who write negative of anything (such as women) only after they've proven incompetent in using it.

You ever read those Amazon reviews where they give a product a 1 star review and the explanation is "I couldn't figure out how to set up the widget. This product sux." That's what MGTOW is. It's a bunch of guys who couldn't figure out how to have productive relationships with the opposite sex (despite it being successfully demonstrated for millenia). And rather than figure out what they're doing wrong...they give women, the gender, a 1 star review.

 

[Higus]

Youtube has a standard of no pornography and shit like that. It's standard. Comparing Pornhub to youtube is asinine.

You missed the point, as expected. Let's try again. You wrote:

The free market would pay for content as long as it's generating views.

Pornhub get's a lot of traffic. Why doesn't it attract major corporate sponsors?
Or look at it another way: why does Youtube have a pornography standard despite the popularity of porn, and how does that relate to it's advertisers?

 

[Darkballs]

Hmm, whom to believe, the people making videos (of themselves) some of which have differing women with them agreeing with them or the Shertard clique that posts anonymously all day on even on the weekends...

I'd say membership in an online support group for those having trouble sustaining meaningful relationships, is a sign that those people have trouble sustaining meaningful relationships.

Drastic conclusion, I know.

 

[EradiatedHaggis]

You mean like that guy who

No, I mean that other guy, and the other one too.

"A guy" does not define a movement and a person posting on an MMA forum that doesnt even know the baseline statement of a movement saying "he knows a guy" is meaningless. Those openingly attacking MGTOW here are just trolls and those that watch/read mainstream media...aka, worthless and clueless.

Even a woman, who knows of the movement finds people like you human waste and equivalent of a male feminist. This one below was so effective in her argument that Peterson just a few weeks later changed his views.

 

[Shoemaker]

You mean like that guy who made a video explaining how women are fools and guys shouldn't be cucks and stuff...right after he got dumped by a single mom he was dating and playing daddy to her kid?

How about you don't believe people who write negative of anything (such as women) only after they've proven incompetent in using it.

You ever read those Amazon reviews where they give a product a 1 star review and the explanation is "I couldn't figure out how to set up the widget. This product sux." That's what MGTOW is. It's a bunch of guys who couldn't figure out how to have productive relationships with the opposite sex (despite it being successfully demonstrated for millenia). And rather than figure out what they're doing wrong...they give women, the gender, a 1 star review.

<{dayum}>

 

[nostradumbass]

You're basically incels.

You can't can't get chicks so you are pretending that they don't want to get chicks.

Maybe some, but most as far as I can tell are guys excusing treating women as disposable by having sex but saying if you're not reliable then I won't be either. I'm not one of these guys because getting into a scum-off sounds horrible, but it's not exactly crazy to consider where the switch happens and marriage is no longer worth the effort.

 

[Shoemaker]

When I was younger, "going your own way" was just called dating. If you don't find someone you want to settle down with, then you keep dating. Being dogmatic about relationships seems pretty silly to me.

 

[panamaican]

No, I mean that other guy, and the other one too.

"A guy" does not define a movement and a person posting on an MMA forum that doesnt even know the baseline statement of a movement saying "he knows a guy" is meaningless. Those openingly attacking MGTOW here are just trolls and those that watch/read mainstream media...aka, worthless and clueless.

Even a woman, who knows of the movement finds people like you human waste and equivalent of a male feminist. This one below was so effective in her argument that Peterson just a few weeks later changed his views.

That's cute but those aren't MGTOW videos you're posting. Textbook example of irrelevant.

As for the MGTOW video I'm referencing, it was in a thread. I'm assuming you're familiar with it since you post here enough and this seems like the type of subject that gets your attention.

As for why I'm attacking MGTOW? It's because I think they're losers. I can do my own reading. People have posted links to their work and to other forums where they post on here. We've had people post videos that they claim demonstrate the superior positions of these people.

I read them, I watch them. I think the people are losers. Sorry.

Saying "feminist" as an insult or "troll" doesn't change these losers into winners. Insulting me doesn't make their movement any less of an example of the socially inept banding together to try and blame others because they don't know how to be anything but relationship failures.

This subject deeply bothers you it seems. Your usual infantile responses have a hint of real emotional pain this time.