Social Meme Thread v.84: Retaking Constantinople

[Chesten_Hesten]

 

[Horse Style]

You can do that still. There’s just a difference between something being in appropriate, and someone being an actual child predator. So keep that distinction.

Even if there is a thread where an Alphabet-American has been arrested on such charges? Still the p-word and g-word aren't allowed?

I'm getting close to hanging up my gloves here.

Yep, this thread is only reason to check in on this site. The main threads are filled with dumb leftist "intellectuals" showcasing terrible logic and reasoning while projecting all day. It's a complete waste of time arguing with them when you'll know they'll run away from the argument and continue spouting the same nonsense.

When these meme threads eventually get modded out of existence, it's time to wash my hands of this site.

 

[The HAMA]

You know he did it lads!

 

[Fox by the Sea]

so we can't mention disney americans.
yeah man, this rule doesn't feel like a streisand effect at all.

 

[The HAMA]

 

[Fugazy]

What could possible be worth folding like a lawn chair so aggressively? I don’t get it. There’s no prize for this shit.

 

[uppercutbus]

Even if there is a thread where an Alphabet-American has been arrested on such charges? Still the p-word and g-word aren't allowed?

And now pointing out an agenda that sexualizes children is bad...

Do not attempt to skirt using /groomer with any adjacent terms or code words.

So can we still use epstein memes, biden sniffs hair, disney, netflix, the trans push on kids, UK grooming scandals which use G and P words?

If not sounds like reddit tier moderation but pretending it's neutral.

 

[S Class]

So can we still use epstein memes, biden sniffs hair, disney, netflix, the trans push on kids, UK grooming scandals which use G and P words?

If not sounds like reddit tier moderation but pretending it's neutral.

^ Basically this is what might happen here now.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Even if there is a thread where an Alphabet-American has been arrested on such charges? Still the p-word and g-word aren't allowed?.

Please read the rule in the rule thread. That exact scenario is covered and is allowed.

So can we still use epstein memes, biden sniffs hair, disney, netflix, the trans push on kids, UK grooming scandals which use G and P words?

If not sounds like reddit tier moderation but pretending it's neutral.

All of these are still kosher.

If anything this formal rule is a step back from where the past month of moderation has been in regards to these topics.

 

[S Class]

 

[S Class]

 

[Fake Doctor]

None of those things there felonies, not nearly as abhorrent as sexual abuse of children



You can do that still. There’s just a difference between something being in appropriate, and someone being an actual child predator. So keep that distinction.

Is being a groomer a felony? Serious question - I don't know the status of that. A vast majority of the stuff I see the term being directed at isn't in any way illegal. It always struck me that grooming itself wasn't actually a crime - it could just be a precursor to one. Kind of like casing the joint versus robbing the place.

 

[S Class]

 

[HockeyBjj]

Is being a groomer a felony? Serious question - I don't know the status of that. A vast majority of the stuff I see the term being directed at isn't in any way illegal. It always struck me that grooming itself wasn't actually a crime - it could just be a precursor to one. Kind of like casing the joint versus robbing the place.

A little googling brought up this. Basically grooming is a “civilian” word and not an actual legal definition of actions. But grooming is understood to be softening a child up so that they engage with sexual acts with them, and that element is illegal. Kind of like if we plebs says someone assaulted someone if they punched them. But that’s not assault, that’s battery, assault only means threatened in the legal sense. I think your casing to burglary analogy is a fairly accurate one. The intent with that action is still to commit a crime.



Grooming – the act of cultivating behavior to exploit a child. While the term has only recently entered the public lexicon, it has been an undercurrent of many criminal cases over the years. However, is grooming a crime?

Grooming Defined
Grooming or child grooming is the act of deliberately establishing a relationship with a child to prepare them for abuse. As an action in and of itself, grooming does not have criminal penalties, but facilitation of a criminal sexual act is considered a crime.

Conspiracy and facilitation are the first steps in the criminal process and are therefore crimes. The difference between grooming and the facilitation of a sex crime is the fact that one is behavioral training while the other is the lead in to a crime. Behavioral conditioning does not always result in abuse, so it remains a gray area legally.

Grooming is like sprinkles on an ice cream cone; it enhances the dessert, but it is still an ice cream cone without the sprinkles. In general, grooming is a tactic used to entice and trap children to make them engage in sexual acts. Rarely is grooming used in a criminal context outside of sexual assault, trafficking, or the production of child pornography.

 

[Mr Holmes]

But grooming is understood to be softening a child up so that they engage with sexual acts with them

Like taking kids to have a drag queen shove zer's genitalia their faces?

 

[S Class]

 

[HockeyBjj]

Like taking kids to have a drag queen shove zer's genitalia their faces?

On the kids at drag shows specifically, because that's basically what caused the explosion in usage around here, just gonna say it's come down from high that there's a need to be more.... eloquent and keep things gray with expressing our displeasure that that type of activity is even debatable.

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

Still got those lines ready though

 

[Horse Style]

Hey @HockeyBjj, it's not against the rules to post memes like this, right?

 

[Rob Battisti]

On the kids at drag shows specifically, because that's basically what caused the explosion in usage around here, just gonna say it's come down from high that there's a need to be more.... eloquent and keep things gray with expressing our displeasure that that type of activity is even debatable.

I get your position. It’s a shitty decision but you’re just here to make this forum a better place.

Is it bannable to say all those who bring kids to those shows are pieces of shit who are softening them up for and normalizing deviant sexual behavior?