Social Meme Thread v.84: Retaking Constantinople

[The HAMA]

You can say it's creepy, weird, and inappropriate. Keep it at that level as opposed to insinuating it's going further when cameras are off tho

Pretty sure it went further when the cameras were off though.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Pretty sure it went further when the cameras were off though.

Conjectures over an unverified diary is exactly the type of thing that’s not wanted on the site. Good example for the type of post that’ll be most likely deleted under the clarified rules.

 

[lifelessheap]

Hello all, there's been an official update to the war room rules in regards to /groomer accusations both against fellow posters, and against public figures and groups. Please check it out here.

This rule addition/clarification is needed because accusing someone of horrible crimes - of committing them or condoning them or attempting to commit them - has always been against the rules of this site and its parent company. These are terms that you agree to when you post here. Any reckless accusations could get the poster and / or the site in trouble with anyone who is litigious. It could show up in a search engine which is not desirable for you or any of us. Never make unsubstantiated or reckless allegations without proof. Any such accusation could result in a formal investigation or a lawsuit being filed against the poster or against the site. It can also lead toward bad blood between posters. We want to keep the forum running smoothly. If you have any questions, please reread the forum rules here. This is in keeping with the rules and the spirit of this forum. This rule update should also help for increased consistency across the forum staff, although as always there is still discretion involved. Thank you.

But the Left are free to throw around accusations of people being white supremacists, Nazis, racists and sexists?

And now pointing out an agenda that sexualizes children is bad...

I'm getting close to hanging up my gloves here.

 

[Mr Holmes]

But the Left are free to throw around accusations of people being white supremacists, Nazis, racists and sexists?

And now pointing out an agenda that sexualizes children is bad...

I'm getting close to hanging up my gloves here.

I called out the same thing earlier. They're not concerned with being sued, severe accusations, site reputation, etc when it comes to that sort of stuff. Its also much harder to file a lawsuit if you're a public figure. So the new rules are just a new level of partisan bullshit.

 

[HockeyBjj]

But the Left are free to throw around accusations of people being white supremacists, Nazis, racists and sexists?

None of those things there felonies, not nearly as abhorrent as sexual abuse of children

Pointing out an agenda that sexualizes children is bad...

You can do that still. There’s just a difference between something being in appropriate, and someone being an actual child predator. So keep that distinction.

 

[Teppodama]

Seriously wonder why after hearing what Blofeld wants to accomplish with his WEF Reich of Young Global Leaders someone hasn't introduced his head to a 6.5mm Creedmoor. I mean, if he truly is a super villain why is he still breathing? Same thing for Soros. Soros is objectively the enemy of Western civilization. Why is he still breathing

 

[lifelessheap]

Pretty sure it went further when the cameras were off though.

Can we post the Steele Dossier?

Or does censorship only go one way?

Someone add Sherdog to this meme.

 

[Fugazy]

No spine having ass dudes.

Shame.

 

[Fugazy]

None of those things there felonies, not nearly as abhorrent as sexual abuse of children



You can do that still. There’s just a difference between something being in appropriate, and someone being an actual child predator. So keep that distinction.

You know we all know this is bullshit right?

It won’t hurt you to admit it.

You don’t have to go out like this bro.

 

[lifelessheap]

None of those things there felonies, not nearly as abhorrent as sexual abuse of children



You can do that still. There’s just a difference between something being in appropriate, and someone being an actual child predator. So keep that distinction.

Don't Modsplain to me. We all know what's going on.

Orders have been given.


Guess who else followed orders?

 

[irish_thug]

None of those things there felonies, not nearly as abhorrent as sexual abuse of children

Still libelous and should be an enforceable violation.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Still libelous and should be an enforceable violation.

The standard flaming rules would apply when directed at a poster, likely it's happening as part of derailing when at a public figure or group to discount anything they're saying that the thread may have been about.

 

[DanSavage]

It can also lead toward bad blood between posters.

 

[Mr Holmes]

The standard flaming rules would apply when directed at a poster, likely it's happening as part of derailing when at a public figure or group to discount anything they're saying that the thread may have been about.

Except you won't enforce it.

 

[Ornife]

Are we permitted to suggest Jeffery Epstein may have been a sexual abuser of children?

 

[HockeyBjj]

Are we permitted to suggest Jeffery Epstein may have been a sexual abuser of children?

Yes. The rules spell out some (not all) examples of what makes an accusation no longer unfounded.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

The standard flaming rules would apply when directed at a poster, likely it's happening as part of derailing when at a public figure or group to discount anything they're saying that the thread may have been about.

i will be absolutely shocked if any of the whatever-ism bots in here even gets a talking to about the matter.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Yes. The rules spell out some (not all) examples of what makes an accusation no longer unfounded.

Can we say an adult who goes to a child drag show is engaging in an activity driven by sexual desire?

 

[Ornife]

Yes. The rules spell out some (not all) examples of what makes an accusation no longer unfounded.

"overall less talk on this subject in general is preferred on this site"

So don't criticize the indiscretions and abuses perpetrated by the powerful against the most vulnerable members of our communities? Got it.

 

[The HAMA]

Conjectures over an unverified diary is exactly the type of thing that’s not wanted on the site. Good example for the type of post that’ll be most likely deleted under the clarified rules.

Can we post the Steele Dossier?

Or does censorship only go one way?

Someone add Sherdog to this meme.

Fuckin hit a never there aye boys!