Social Meme Thread v.84: Retaking Constantinople

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well due to that new rule and the very shady wasy it was put in place with no explanation or rational as to why, in the last 24 hours I went from someone who would go out of the way to not get banned to honestly not giving a shit if I was.

I am quite certain if you look at the 5 newest mods one or more of them are the root cause.

Imagine cracking down more on saying the word groomer than those actually supporting the act itself.

This isn't a Reddit tier rule it's a Tumblr tier one, which is even worse.
i have similar sentiments. much to my disapointment.
if the rule is you can't call anyone that, or use those words legitimately, it sure looks like the forum could turn into a safe place for people that sexualize children, because you can't call them out anymore, because you'd be banned.

at the moment, i don't give a shit if they ban me. sure as shit won't come back if they do.
 


<5>







m2.jpg





Yeah, that's not new. Or maybe he's trotting it out again in an effort to make it a thing.

You know how people bitched about trump being a silver spoon dumbass who was completely unqualified for office? Well Trudeau is a more egregious version of that. The guy isn't qualified to manage a fucking McDonald's but he's just as good at pandering as the other T. The only reason he's still in office is the reason Trump is gone. Optics pushed by the media. This guy is a fucking moron.

Shecovery. Give me a fucking break.



You should refer to them as 'Kiddie Fuckers.'

Because that's within the rules on Sherdog.

Pardon me and my boomer slur. And yes, I know it is illegal to do kiddie-fucker shit, but, not nearly illegal enough.

 
Edit 2: This is how you know the republican party and the church are all filled up with fucking :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes--they are constantly looking for a cultural scapegoat they can shit on. Transwomen. Muslims. Black people. Illegal aliens. Jews. Whatever the flavor of the year is and how much they can get away with. But you know who you'll never, ever see them round up and throw in the gulag? Fucking :eek::eek::eek::eek:s. They won't because they'd be throwing in a bunch of people from their own group.

During my life time, I swear to god

You had me until this edit.

This isn't really about political parties and churches. Its about the rich and powerful protecting Jeffrey Epstein until he was arrested because he had dirt on them, so he had him killed, and everybody knows it. Funny how his assistant woman was found guilty of trafficking kids... to absolutely no one.

I really don't give a fuck which kiddie fuckers are members of what church, or party, or employed by what media corporation, or own what big tech corporation.

Get rid of them. By any means neccessary.
 
I asked this in the last thread, and nobody seemed to know why the hoodied twink character isn't featured in more memes? He's a lot more likeable and sympathetic than any of the greasy, gross-looking soyjacks. He just looks sad.

0a.jpg


a1.jpg


He should be on (at?) Nordic Man's side IMO.

a2.jpg
he's the embodiment of this young generation - insecure, low-t, despondent, manipulable.
the rest are just signifiers of stupidity.
and just like that, his signifier turns into a meta-signifier: just as the character, the meme doesn't seem to fit in neatly anywhere.
 
i have similar sentiments. much to my disapointment.
if the rule is you can't call anyone that, or use those words legitimately, it sure looks like the forum could turn into a safe place for people that sexualize children, because you can't call them out anymore, because you'd be banned.

at the moment, i don't give a shit if they ban me. sure as shit won't come back if they do.

I doubt it'd get that far and if people on here want to support being a creep I think it's actually better they make their weird thoughts public for others to see




755.jpg
 
The mod that gave me yellows sent me a DM saying...

'It's a forbidden word. Don't post it. I'll leave it like that.'

'G****mer / G****ming
P***/ p****phile
Kids d**** show

And accusations of said words are now auto infractions , across the site'


And.... that's it.

He refused to answer any of my questions, such as...

"And when was this rule added?

So where was this rule change posted?

Are we expected to check the rules daily for updates?

How about 'Adults Who Want/Like To Fuck Children' ????

How about 'Who We Take Our Dogs To Get Their Hair Cut?'

Is that acceptable?

And don't get me started this effectively censors all discussion of teachers teaching sexually exploitative material and the rise of sexual assaults of students by teachers.

So, until further notice, apparently mods can make rules they don't have to post, and yellow members that retroactively violated that rule, that they can't point to where it was posted to notify the community.

OIP.h6cFdojeh4WzvnirNiDr-AHaE7

Jeffrey Epstein Approves.
Yep. Basically al my infractions are from this or for saying violence against them is OK. It is crap sherdog
 

Click your fingers immediately after locking. I found this method after making it 90 minutes down the road for a job once, then turning back because I couldn't help but obsess over the idea I'd forgot to lock the door. Of course I had locked it too. After that I knew something had to change, so I tried a few different methods until one worked.
 
he's the embodiment of this young generation - insecure, low-t, despondent, manipulable.
the rest are just signifiers of stupidity.
and just like that, his signifier turns into a meta-signifier: just as the character, the meme doesn't seem to fit in neatly anywhere.

I blame his circumstances and environment, he's still innocent and malleable enough to be redpilled and redeemed. The sad hoodied twink doesn't deserve to be made into a villain.




 
Yep. Basically al my infractions are from this or for saying violence against them is OK. It is crap sherdog

Calling for violence?

Yeah, that crosses a line.

Got to think of it from the mods perspective. If calling for violence against one group is bad, and calling for violence against another group is good, what about the rule against calling for violence?



Violence/Genocide- Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims. If you choose to celebrate the victims injuries and/or deaths or suggest they deserved what happened to them, you will likely get infractions.
 
Which begs the question - What new stupid 'rules' (are they actually rules posted somewhere) will they add next that will prevent discussion/criticism of another protected group?

Ban criticism of cops?

No discussion about the CCP?

How about Palestine?

Can't talk about the Southern Border Crisis, because it'd be racist?

Up until now, I'd give the Warroom's moderation a solid 9/10. We haven't had the same problems other big forums have had. But in the same week Reddit & Twitter bans 'gr***ers,' Sherdog also bans it and 'P***philes' and 'Child d*** Shows?'

A line has been crossed.

"If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticise".
- Voltaire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top