News McGregor back in court

<{hughesimpress}><36><cruzshake>

I wonder what Habib has to say bout this guy, these days.
<KhabibBS>
 
Guessing if I mention him he deletes this post as well.

I posted links that the Irish high court ordered their police to provide the evidence (which they refused to give for years) to the woman who was attacked in 2018 (the hotel woman). Also posted a link to a report that multiple men then broke into her home while her, her boyfriend, and her child slept. They stabbed her boyfriend multiple times. Also posted a story of the OTHER Irish woman attacked years later (the yacht woman), who had rocks thrown through her windows and her car set on fire.

My post (complete with links to all those news reports) were literally deleted by a mod who straight up bragged about it. Several of my follow up posts in that same thread were also removed for referencing the deletion at the start of the thread. The warning given to me was "mod bashing" which apparently is code for telling me I can't mention what a mod does on this forum. So yeah I don't want to say the name lest this get deleted as well. What a fucking joke.

The hint is all this happened in this thread: https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...or-mcgregor-scheduled-for-jury-trial.4342584/
The fact that shitstain of a thread, which was a disgusting PR hit piece blatantly attacking rape victims, was protected while my posts were deleted tells you all you need to know.

Hint #2 is he's also active in this thread, spamming shitty gifs of Conor while defending him. Surprise surprise.
Connor is a mod confirmed.
 
Sorry but I don't believe you. You're saying that you personally witnessed Conor McGregor sexually assault someone? Are you a witness in a trial? I really don't believe you.
Remembering that sexual assault includes such things as any touching in a sexual manner against someone's consent, including their clothing, like trying to, let's just come up with a random hypothetical example: filming yourself with your phone in public at a club, then filming your own hand reaching into a strangers dress, & trying expose their breast while filming it, but the person stops you by grabbing a hold of their own dress first. That would be sexual assault. And it doesn't matter if the woman didn't want to make a scene about it in the club or a case about it in court. That's assault. And furthermore, it would be really dumb to, again, fully hypothetically, post that video online, not only because of the guilt that shows in your intention, but also because broadcasting that if you succeeded would make that matter much more serious.
 
Last edited:
My issue is with the people automatically attacking the woman and calling her a gold digger, or people like you who act like rich people don't need to rape because they have money. Like rich people don't rape. Have you been living under a rock?
The hammer needs to come down hard on offenders on both side of that equation.

Rapists... obviously. We will come back to this

False rape occusers...
They REALLY REALLY FUCK things up.
Because of them there is doubt cast and it makes it more difficult to punish the shit out of rapists in the way they deserve. It should be straight up lynch mob. If you rape someone, you dont get to play anymore... harm a child? You don't get to play AND we take you out slowly.

But... false rape accusers create that DOUBT that winds up saving the goddamn monsters.
 
The hammer needs to come down hard on offenders on both side of that equation.

Rapists... obviously. We will come back to this

False rape occusers...
They REALLY REALLY FUCK things up.
Because of them there is doubt cast and it makes it more difficult to punish the shit out of rapists in the way they deserve. It should be straight up lynch mob. If you rape someone, you dont get to play anymore... harm a child? You don't get to play AND we take you out slowly.

But... false rape accusers create that DOUBT that winds up saving the goddamn monsters.

They are both wrong, but one is worse in my opinion.

The two potential fuckup scenarios:

1. Falsely calling a guy a rapist

2. Falsely Calling a girl that actually was raped a liar and gold dinging whore.

If the person in scenario 1 is wrong, yeah, it sucks, a guy was falsely accused of rape. But to me that isn't as bad as being wrong in scenario 2 where a girl actually was raped and falsely accused of being a gold digging whore.

The obvious answer is to reserve judgment completely. Unfortunately, I see a lot of people coming at the alleged victims in such cases before a verdict is made , and in my opinion, that is the worst option.
 
Last edited:
Any proof of this or are we just going to string the man up and call him a rapist anyway?

Some right morons in here.

Idk if you've read what's coming out of the court case so far dude but it's pretty damning tbh. There's certainly a lot of evidence. Whether it's enough to convict beyond reasonable doubt I'm not sure but from what I've read I'm heavily leaning towards him being a rapist.
 
Rape is not about getting laid.
It's about power
michel-foucault-826x459_2.jpg
 
Idk if you've read what's coming out of the court case so far dude but it's pretty damning tbh. There's certainly a lot of evidence. Whether it's enough to convict beyond reasonable doubt I'm not sure but from what I've read I'm heavily leaning towards him being a rapist.
I’ll try to catch up properly asap. Any concrete evidence or is it just a lady saying these things occurred though?

Ultimately she’s going to get a payout here and he’s going to walk away with his freedom right?
 
I’ll try to catch up properly asap. Any concrete evidence or is it just a lady saying these things occurred though?

Ultimately she’s going to get a payout here and he’s going to walk away with his freedom right?

She immediately went to a doctor, she was shaking, crying and bruised and the doctor had to remove her tampon using forceps as it was jammed up there so badly.
 
She immediately went to a doctor, she was shaking, crying and bruised and the doctor had to remove her tampon using forceps as it was jammed up there so badly.
Interesting. If this does go down as guilty and more info such as the doctors comes out, him getting away with some hush money is going to be ridiculous. Will keep an eye on it all.
 
I’ll try to catch up properly asap. Any concrete evidence or is it just a lady saying these things occurred though?

Ultimately she’s going to get a payout here and he’s going to walk away with his freedom right?

Conor said it was consensual rough sex, but the testimony from the doctor paints a damn violent and fucked up picture: a crying girl with bruises on her wrists, ankles, breasts, ass, neck, arms and legs, an abrasion on her jaw that was bleeding, missing acrylic nails, and a tampon wedged so far in her vagina that the doctor needed to use forceps to remove it.
 
He wasn’t taking no for an answer’ – woman who claims she was raped by Conor McGregor describes how she tried to fend off MMA fighter

Paywalled link bypassed


"Conor McGregor pinned down and violently raped a young woman in a Dublin hotel after taking cocaine, the High Court has been told. Mother-of-one Nikita Ní Laimhín (35) was left with extensive bruises and abrasions, including “black and blue” wrists, a bloodied scratch to her breast, and neck pain after being placed in “a stranglehold” by the mixed martial arts star. The hair colourist claims she tried to fight off McGregor (36), but submitted to him after he three times put her in an armlock until she could not breathe. She claims he pinned her down on a bed after she had earlier refused to perform a sex act on him.

During the assault he is alleged to have told her: “Now you know what it was like in the Octagon when I had to tap myself out three times.”

The rape is alleged to have occurred after McGregor picked her up from her Christmas party and brought her to a penthouse suite in the Beacon Hotel in Dublin. The court heard she later presented at the Sexual Assault Treatment Unit of the Rotunda Hospital, “an absolute wreck, constantly weeping, and in pain”. A tampon embedded in her vagina had to be removed with a forceps, a jury was told. Details of the alleged rape were outlined on the opening day of Ms Ní Laimhín’s civil action against McGregor and his associate, James Lawrence of Rafter’s Road in Drimnagh. She claims to have been raped by both men at the hotel on December 9, 2018. She was 29 at the time. The two defendants deny her claims and say they each twice had consensual sex with Ms Ní Laimhín. They say the claims made in her lawsuit were “false, malicious and patently made in bad faith” and that a claim for damages so she can relocate to a new home amounted to extortion. Ms Ní Laimhín’s counsel John Gordon SC said McGregor had claimed he and Ms Ní Laimhín were “just having fun and a bout of rough sex”. He said the defendants would try to portray her as “a gold-digger” and “a fraud”. But the barrister said this would be contradicted by medical evidence.
 
with a quick google search, her photos arent hard to find. shes not really fit so makes me wonder, with all his money, fame and lots of woman shallow enough to throw themselves at him, why would he choose that? hard pass for me.


just my opinion.
 
Back
Top