Crime Mark Zuckerberg admits censorship and vows to curb election donations Zuckerberg: Biden-Harris ‘Repeatedly Pressured’ Us To Censor Free Speech

[PainIsLIfe]

I don't think leftists even pretend that it doesn't happen, they just think it is normal. They certainly don't like discussing it, though.

They started with "it's a private company", morphed to "it's only to protect people from dangerous false imfo"; and finally landed on "it's no big deal".

When you don't have actual positions and standards, its easy to constantly change your view on an issue.

 

[Deleted member 267581]

Censorship has always been the price for any sort of socialist equality (financial, racial, etc). Fair elections, gun ownership or general ability to protect yourself are going to be history. Such regime is not possible without division and constant fear of groups that have more power/privilege than yourself.

Yet, everyone is afraid of the orange man who has already been the president, and the country was pretty well off on many levels. That's the benefit of having someone controversial in the office. It is very difficult to start wars or create pro-government policies when everyone is on a different page.

In what way were we well off in 2020?

 

[Deleted member 267581]

So the best you’ve got is to tacitly (and explicitly) support unconstitutional acts by Dems due to Trump… again, you’re making my point.

The problem “populists” like me have, is that Dems have been demonizing and exaggerating Trump’s “threat to democracy” from before the beginning… first it’s the basket of deplorables, then he’s a white supremecist, then he’s colluding with Russia, then he led an attack in the capitol, etc, etc… Trump used a BS legal-based strategy and bully tactics to try and get his way in 2020- THAT I can agree with and condemn.

Wrong. The fake elector plot was not a legal strategy you dipshit. There’s a reason why a lot of gov officials who are on both sides say he shouldn’t be back.

The problem, is you try or parlay that into “he’s literally Hitler” and go on to use this vitriol and rhetoric to justify reprehensible behavior from the Dems (eg rigging 2016 DNC, removing medical informed consent, propping up a demented elderly president, installing Kamala, etc).

 

[PhitePhan]

Wrong. The fake elector plot was not a legal strategy you dipshit. There’s a reason why a lot of gov officials who are on both sides say he shouldn’t be back.

“This scheme was defended by a fringe legal theory developed by Trump attorneys Kenneth Chesebro and John Eastman, detailed in the Eastman memos”

Trump fake electors plot - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Wrong. The fake elector plot was not a legal strategy you dipshit. There’s a reason why a lot of gov officials who are on both sides say he shouldn’t be back.

It was a 'novel legal theory.' Remember those? Can't have it both ways.

 

[Deleted member 267581]

It was a 'novel legal theory.' Remember those? Can't have it both ways.

you can’t just say “fringe legal theory “ and think ha yes I gottem.


There was no legal theory which is why people are involved are facing felonies.


The fake part of fake electors is illegal lol

It was a 'novel legal theory.' Remember those? Can't have it both ways.