Social Marjorie Taylor Greene On Tape Harassing AOC

one of the things I like to do when I'm bored is to announce to perfect strangers on the internet that I have absolutely no idea what "grifter" means. I heard someone say the word once, and just assumed it was a general insult, like "asshole", and therefore it must be a term for someone I don't like. I have never heard of the word "grift", and am far too dumb and lazy to ever look it up. Anyway, AOC is a grifter,
 
AOC can't singlehandedly do whatever she wants. She is one of 535 members of Congress. She still has to work with people in order to get things done.

Words and their definitions are important. A grifter has no beliefs. They go wherever the money goes.
What is AOC gaining? What is she blocking? What is she not speaking up about? If fame and fortune is what she really desired, she could have it 10 fold.
Again, calling her a grifter is just flat out wrong. You can call her politically naive or politically stupid, but calling her a grifter is saying she's just been faking all her positions this whole time, it's just ignoring the realities of her power, her position, and maybe even her capabilities.
She can believe what I believe, and still be ineffective at getting things done.

Is Bernie a grifter because he dropped out and supported Biden? Is Sam Seder, Vaush or Anna Kasparian grifters because they didn't support #Forcethevote? Just because someone disagrees with how you think things should be done doesn't mean they don't believe in getting those things done.
The "attention" that AOC generates is largely negative. She gets shit on by the right, and she gets shit on by the left, and then the Jimmy Dore type far leftys shit on her. She's damned if she does, damned if she doesnt.

She doesn't even vote her principles, let alone create legislation in line with her stated core beliefs. Her most famous work has been the Green New Deal, which was more virtue signaling garbage with no real direction or path to implementation. Read: a grift. She has made a huge name for herself by claiming to be progressive without actually doing anything progressive. Perhaps she's just an opportunist and she knows what her fanbase wants to hear, but I don't see much difference between the two. Either way, her actions do not match her words. Liar, opportunist, grifter...I don't really care. She's the type of person that livestreams about money in politics from her luxury apartment, and then stumps for congressional pay increases. A real progressive hero, that woman.

I wouldn't call Bernie a grifter so much as a spineless, DNC capitulation machine that was never fit to lead anything. He made a career out of attacking the power structure, and then he cucked twice to the power structure at the first sign of resistance. Athough he is a socialist with multiple homes and a net worth north of $3 million, so maybe he is.
 
Last edited:
She doesn't even vote her principles, let alone create legislation in line with her stated core beliefs. Her most famous work has been the Green New Deal, which was more virtue signaling garbage with no real direction or path to implementation. Read: a grift. She has made a huge name for herself by claiming to be progressive without actually doing anything progressive.

I wouldn't call Bernie a grifter so much as a spineless capitulation machine that cucks to the DNC as soon as they ask him to. Athough he is a socialist with multiple homes and a net worth north of $3 million, so maybe he is.

Then you just don't know what the term grifter means. You're making up your own definitions, and applying them to whomever doesn't do the things the exact way you think they should be done. It's childish, toxic nonsense that dumb people like Jimmy Dore does.

If AOC is a grifter, and MAYBE Bernie Sanders is too, then the word grifter has no meaning. You aren't even aware of the purpose and details of the Green New Deal.
It's just bullshit purity tests from people that have no idea what they're talking about, are into performative politics, and want things to just magically be changed with the snap of the fingers.
 
I'm not the one who responded with a nonsense ad hominem rather than address the content of the post, "new" guy, oh ye of the presumably razor wit. If you are so sharp it stands to reason you have been "triggered" to respond in such manner if anyone has.

I wash better genetic stock than you off my scrotum each day, but you go ahead and keep on thinking your attempt to yell "gotten to" was a total success in case you can get some pats on the back from your fellow knuckle draggers. You sound like you could really use a win of some kind, however weakly.

And when you mistake sarcasm for anger it makes it fairly clear that you are projecting. Take a break, and then let's see if you can do better.
 
Okay then, so tell me how AOC - who generates attention and a following by speaking about things she has never acted on - is not a grifter, but somehow Republicans are? They're generally heinous people, but they usually tell you the awful shit they're going to do before they do it.
What is she supposed to act on as a freshman Congress person with no real power?
 
I'm not the one who responded with a nonsense ad hominem rather than address the content of the post, "new" guy, oh ye of the presumably razor wit. If you are so sharp it stands to reason you have been "triggered" to respond in such manner if anyone has.

I wash better genetic stock than you off my scrotum each day, but you go ahead and keep on thinking your attempt to yell "gotten to" was a total success in case you can get some pats on the back from your fellow knuckle draggers. You sound like you could really use a win of some kind, however weakly.

And when you mistake sarcasm for anger it makes it fairly clear that you are projecting. Take a break, and then let's see if you can do better.

you seem mad.

i would be too if i choose to defend nonsense positions. and paid to post on a free karate forum
 
you seem mad.

i would be too if i choose to defend nonsense positions. and paid to post on a free karate forum
Don't say I didn't try to help. Enjoy your new account while it lasts, clownshoes.
 
AOC can't singlehandedly do whatever she wants. She is one of 535 members of Congress. She still has to work with people in order to get things done.

Words and their definitions are important. A grifter has no beliefs. They go wherever the money goes.
What is AOC gaining?

Clout within the party. She's a "team player". She talks a lot of shit, but when it gets down to it, she doesn't rock the boat. That is pretty much the definition of having no beliefs, and just looking out for yourself. She won't speak out or vote against the party when she disagrees, because she might actually have to put something on the line to do it. I don't find anything particularly offensive about it, considering they're mostly all cut from the same cloth, but she's not the radical revolutionary she sells herself as. When Pelosi and the gang say "jump", she asks "how high?".
 
Clout within the party. She's a "team player". She talks a lot of shit, but when it gets down to it, she doesn't rock the boat. That is pretty much the definition of having no beliefs, and just looking out for yourself. She won't speak out or vote against the party when she disagrees, because she might actually have to put something on the line to do it. I don't find anything particularly offensive about it, considering they're mostly all cut from the same cloth, but she's not the radical revolutionary she sells herself as. When Pelosi and the gang say "jump", she asks "how high?".

man, it took a lot of time for this news to hit canada
 
If you are talking about the way a leftist uses words then you are right. They call people who disagree with them fascist, racist, various kind of phobe etc.

But that is not true in my case. The FBI definition of terrorism is the use of violence against innocent people to advance a political goal. That is literally true of Antifa, BLM, and Hamas. Groups that this dumb bitch supports.

No we call you racist when you are racist. You may see it as a “disagreement” because you don’t believe racism exists and to you if it does, it’s in reverse. You’ll never understand any of this because well......
 
One of these days, right wingers will grow the fuck up..

And on that day, they'll stop being right wingers

I believe that Conservatism is dead in America. At this point, the GOP is the party of one mans ideology. I’m not really sure if it will come back any time in the near future. If Trump runs in 2024 and loses there might be a slim chance but my belief that by then the GOP will have voted in too many Trump denizens that going back might be too difficult.
 
I believe that Conservatism is dead in America. At this point, the GOP is the party of one mans ideology. I’m not really sure if it will come back any time in the near future. If Trump runs in 2024 and loses there might be a slim chance but my belief that by then the GOP will have voted in too many Trump denizens that going back might be too difficult.
The wild thing is he doesn't even have a real ideology. It's literally just about whatever serves his ego and his bank account at the moment.
 
The wild thing is he doesn't even have a real ideology. It's literally just about whatever serves his ego and his bank account at the moment.

I believe Trump knows enough about what his base needs that he gives them just enough, mixes in a shit ton of fear and grievance so that when he does the things his base doesn’t like it leaves them with a feeling of he’s better than the alternative. The alternative which being the manufactured fear he’s been pushing.
 
Then you just don't know what the term grifter means. You're making up your own definitions, and applying them to whomever doesn't do the things the exact way you think they should be done. It's childish, toxic nonsense that dumb people like Jimmy Dore does.

If AOC is a grifter, and MAYBE Bernie Sanders is too, then the word grifter has no meaning. You aren't even aware of the purpose and details of the Green New Deal.
It's just bullshit purity tests from people that have no idea what they're talking about, are into performative politics, and want things to just magically be changed with the snap of the fingers.

Are you really going to accuse people of performative politics while defending AOC? Seriously? Performative politics is her entire shtick.

The only reason Jimmy Dore pisses off neolibs is because they can't pretend to be modern lefties with people like him around. That's why you're arguing semantics and pretending that the Green New Deal had any purpose other than to virtue signal to progressives while providing them nothing of actual substance. This is how you think things get done? This is how we're going to help an increasingly desperate population? Why not hold elected officials accountable and expect them to deliver on what they were elected to do?

For the record, I'm not a Jimmy Dore type progressive. I disagree with 70% of what he says, but he's right about AOC.
 
Last edited:
I believe that Conservatism is dead in America. At this point, the GOP is the party of one mans ideology. I’m not really sure if it will come back any time in the near future. If Trump runs in 2024 and loses there might be a slim chance but my belief that by then the GOP will have voted in too many Trump denizens that going back might be too difficult.
Lol trump was not the cause of anything.

he’s a symptom.

Good God Almighty.
 
Back
Top