- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 57,669
- Reaction score
- 39,478
Are you against cash transfers like Social Security and the expanded child tax credit?Yes, you want the government to subsidize big business "saving money", we've already addressed this
Are you against cash transfers like Social Security and the expanded child tax credit?Yes, you want the government to subsidize big business "saving money", we've already addressed this
Not the same and you know it, you're not throwing me off with bullshitAre you against cash transfers like Social Security and the expanded child tax credit?
How is it not the same?Not the same and you know it, you're not throwing me off with bullshit
Social safety nets don't exist to subsidize greed. I've already explained this, you're playing dumb or you are dumb. I'm done being nice about this.How is it not the same?
Didn't say that, also that's a good way to destroy a country.
Guess what happens when no one has money to spend stupid, why do you think Henry Ford paid his workers better than everyone else.
Remember the culmination of the Gilded Age, where we got the term "robber baron"? Great depression.
Goddamn some of ypu are short sighted and indoctrinated
@Islam Imamate
The argument that cash transfers subsidize corporations could easily apply to SS though. Walmart is known for hiring seniors on SS for example. From your POV SS is subsidizing Walmart.Social safety nets don't exist to subsidize greed. I've already explained this, you're playing dumb or you are dumb. I'm done being nice about this.
Ford did things the way they did at the start so people could afford their shit
NO. it is the business practices, NOT the programs themselvesThe argument that cash transfers subsidize corporations could easily apply to SS though. Walmart is known for hiring seniors on SS for example. From your POV SS is subsidizing Walmart.
3 people own more wealth than the bottom half of AmericansDamn brother, where do you come up with this shit? More than 96 percent of the wealth is owned by people who are NOT billionaires, how the hell do they own that much wealth when they have no money to spend?
What do you mean?NO. it is the business practices, NOT the programs themselves
Self explanatory, I didn't write that shitin hebrewWhat do you mean?
So what's your issue again with my policy suggestion of raising the cap on HB1 visas while investing in social programs like stronger unemployment benefits and the expanded child tax credit to offset any labor disruptions?Self explanatory, I didn't write that shitin hebrew
I often joke that people who are worried about Jews running the world need to be more worried about Indians. Tech>Finance in terms of market cap and influence on society and Indians are radically overrepresented in tech."Jews will not replace us. Indians will, and we'll vote for it".
The only solace I have in Trump becoming president again is that his average voter will suffer worse from his policies than I will. I know it's petty, but I can't help it.
Labor disruptions = people being fired for cheaper labor = corporate greed.So what's your issue again with my policy suggestion of raising the cap on HB1 visas while investing in social programs like stronger unemployment benefits and the expanded child tax credit to offset any labor disruptions?
Yeah, to be clear, I have no problem with Indians or anyone else coming to the US and working. What I have a problem with is employers exploiting immigrants for cheap labor and depressing wages for everyone else. The fault here lies with capital, not labor.I often joke that people who are worried about Jews running the world need to be more worried about Indians. Tech>Finance in terms of market cap and influence on society and Indians are radically overrepresented in tech.
Of course neither Indians nor Jews being overrepresented in high paying, influential fields is a bad thing, its the reality of a successful cosmopolitan society.
3 people own more wealth than the bottom half of Americans