- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 33,662
- Reaction score
- 6,134
Nobody discredited Strikeforce, it was simply a newer and smaller organization.
Apparently, sometimes people from other dimensions slips into our own without realizing it.
Nobody discredited Strikeforce, it was simply a newer and smaller organization.
So what if Zuffa owned it? A Strikeforce bout is still a Strikeforce bout. Jacare and Kennedy from Strikeforce are still better than most of the UFC division back then And Today!
Strikeforce had a lot of great talent but their divisions didn't have many fighters. The top Strikeforce guys are still top guys.
Here is the UFC MW top ten without the Strikeforce guys
C. Chris Weidman
1. Vitor Belfort
2. Lyoto Machida
3. Michael Bisping
4. Thales Leites
5. CB Dollaway
6. Robert Whitaker
7. Roan Carneiro
8. Tim Boetsch
9. Josh Samman
10. Rafael Natal
Had to use other sites for after #8. Without the SF guys, that is one sorry top ten. I bet if SF were still around, people would think Tim Boetsch is on-par with Luke Rockhold.
Makes me wonder how the Bellator guys would do in the UFC.
Anderson Silva has a great legacy because all the best MWs weren't in the UFC.
I don't like what the ufc hype machine is doing to Rhonda
Before the Strikeforce merger, MW was the absolute worst division in the UFC. It's now arguably the best. Anderson Silva has a great legacy because all the best MWs weren't in the UFC.
I disagree. He beat the "best" in the UFC MW division at that time. He also beat a lot of guys who had no business being in a title match, like Patrick Cote, Travis Lutter, Thales Leites.
Okami, Henderson, Sonnen and Franklin were top competition and he deserves credit for those wins.
I disagree. He beat the "best" in the UFC MW division at that time. He also beat a lot of guys who had no business being in a title match, like Patrick Cote, Travis Lutter, Thales Leites.
Okami, Henderson, Sonnen and Franklin were top competition and he deserves credit for those wins.
They didn't have a better division when he signed if you look at in through 2009 glasses. They had Werdum who had just been KTFO by a noob (JDS), Arlovski who just lost to someone that wasn't ranked and Rogers who had never beat anyone in the top 50 outside of his KO of Andrei.
I am not sure what Luke is really saying, his best win before he worked for Zuffa was Paul Bradley. It wasn't like everyone knew he was one of the best middleweights ever then.
Are you crazy?
They had Josh Barnett, Kharitonov, DC, Overeem, Werdum, Arlovski, BFS...
who did UFC had at that time?? Cain (not yet the champion), Carwin (a part time fighter), Lesnar (Not MMA fighter)....
Sorry bud, but you don't know what you are talking about.
Take only the Grand Prix, and it was already much more worthy to go to SF than to join the UFC (at that time).
The problem was: Fedor lost, then BFS lost to a replacement, and then SF lost steam. I believe that, if Fedor would have won (until the finals), SF would have been able to beat the UFC (for that time), and history would be completely different then.
But with Fedor loss, this Grand Prix lost stream and the loss of revenue made them sell out to Zuffa.
They didn't have Sergei and Barnett in 2009. Overeem was competing in Japan and had zero top ten victories at that point. Bigfoots biggest win was a SD over old/fat Ricco. Arlovski and Werdum had been knocked out by unranked fighters in the first round around the time Fedor signed.
This is what I am referring to with revisionist history. According to people here everyone who ever fought even one fight in Strikeforce (even under Zuffaforce) is forever a Strikeforce guy and they always had the roster they did.
People who actually watched Strikeforce as it was happening remember I am sure.
Had not fought in Strikeforce for a long time and won the belt in a shit tourney and Fedor would not fight him. Overeem had zero victories in the top ten and that was Fedor's camp reasoning for not fighting himNo, you are mistaken.
AO was fighting in Japan, but he was SF's HW. They allowed him to fight in Dream. But he belonged to SF.
As soon as they announced Fedor, the tourney was announced. At that time, they had everyone.
AO left the tourney as Fedor lost to BFS, but by then Fedor had lost to Werdum already and the myth was done.
Revisionist history is now trying to discredit the fact that all SF's HW had better name than what Zuffa could present to Fedor.
Heck, the best competition they had for Fedor was Lesnar! :redface: