- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
- Messages
- 9,239
- Reaction score
- 15,158
If that's the case Conor is going to do the same same against Chandler
A low IQ brawler, right?
Logical conclusion, except Conor WAS a badass when he fought Eddie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that's the case Conor is going to do the same same against Chandler
A low IQ brawler, right?
Patricky Pitbull is nowhere near as good as Patricio, RDA was severely dehydrated, Pettis was on his decline, etc. Context matters.
Never has he gone out and looked like a world beater, he takes tons of damage in fights in hopes of “out toughing” his opponents. I stand by my assessment that he’s a tough over acheiver.
Also Nick Thompson was one of the randoms who knocked him out, Chandler was still wet behind the ears when they fought, and he’s out there in the minor leagues right now getting dusted by randoms. Let’s not make any excuses.
Masterclass of Conor or choke of Alvarez?
it is common knowledge that Eddie took a dive...re-watch that fight carefully.
Luck? A renowned striker knocks out an openent and it's luck?Alvarez was shook from the start of the shit talking. If anyone believed the Conman hype, it was Ed.
Conman is unique in how each win has a logical explanation, and each loss was an exposure of areas he is lacking.
Halloway: Unconfident
Porier 1: Believed the hype, no gameplan
Siver: Was never good
Aldo: Luck
Alvarez: Choke
Diaz 2: Judges being judges
Cowboy: Paid to throw the match
And then the losses:
Diaz 1: Dominated
Mayweather: Dominated
Nurmagomedov: Dominated
Porier 2: Dominated
Porier 3: Dominated
? Chandler ? : (Dominated)