Elections Leftists, you need to bend the knee on Transgender Athletes. The future of the Democrat Party depends on it.

[LMP]

You are arguing that the sky is bright green with pink polka dots to someone that says it is blue.

The "biological differences" argument is basically the smooth-brain special of sports debates. Yes, every human has biological differences—congratulations, you’ve grasped the absolute bare minimum of human anatomy. Do you want a gold star? If biological differences alone were enough to justify exclusion, then we'd need 47 different leagues to account for height, lung capacity, muscle density, fast-twitch fiber distribution, and every other physical variance that affects competition. But that’s not how sports work, and it never has been. Yet here you are, confidently shouting "BIOLOGY!" like a caveman who just discovered fire, as if that alone settles the debate.


And yet, somehow, this brilliant revelation about biology only seems to apply when trans athletes are involved. When a 6'6" woman in the WNBA swats every shot into the third row, nobody cries about her biological advantage. When a cisgender female runner dominates because she naturally produces more testosterone, the outrage mysteriously disappears. But the second a trans athlete enters the picture, suddenly, everyone turns into a Nobel Prize-winning expert on “fairness” and “science.” It’s almost cute watching people pretend they’ve spent years fighting for the integrity of women's sports when, in reality, they’ve never watched a WNBA game in their lives.


At the end of the day, “biological differences” is just the latest excuse people use when they don’t have a real argument. If your logic were consistent, you’d be banning every natural outlier from competition, but you’re not—because this was never about fairness. It’s about exclusion. So sure, keep yelling "Biology says so!" like a toddler who just learned a new word. Just don’t expect the rest of us to pretend you’ve said anything intelligent.

 

[sanguinius]

The "biological differences" argument is basically the smooth-brain special of sports debates. Yes, every human has biological differences—congratulations, you’ve grasped the absolute bare minimum of human anatomy. Do you want a gold star? If biological differences alone were enough to justify exclusion, then we'd need 47 different leagues to account for height, lung capacity, muscle density, fast-twitch fiber distribution, and every other physical variance that affects competition. But that’s not how sports work, and it never has been. Yet here you are, confidently shouting "BIOLOGY!" like a caveman who just discovered fire, as if that alone settles the debate.


And yet, somehow, this brilliant revelation about biology only seems to apply when trans athletes are involved. When a 6'6" woman in the WNBA swats every shot into the third row, nobody cries about her biological advantage. When a cisgender female runner dominates because she naturally produces more testosterone, the outrage mysteriously disappears. But the second a trans athlete enters the picture, suddenly, everyone turns into a Nobel Prize-winning expert on “fairness” and “science.” It’s almost cute watching people pretend they’ve spent years fighting for the integrity of women's sports when, in reality, they’ve never watched a WNBA game in their lives.


At the end of the day, “biological differences” is just the latest excuse people use when they don’t have a real argument. If your logic were consistent, you’d be banning every natural outlier from competition, but you’re not—because this was never about fairness. It’s about exclusion. So sure, keep yelling "Biology says so!" like a toddler who just learned a new word. Just don’t expect the rest of us to pretend you’ve said anything intelligent.

Lmao you people are mindbroken, trying to justify the most idiotic positions.
There are verifiable, objective, significant differences between the sexes. If you don’t believe that, you shouldn’t support female leagues at all. This isn’t introducing a new way to segregate athletes and it isn’t just separating superior athletes, you hilarious child.

 

[sanguinius]

Reminder that the modern left is a cult. They’ve replaced God with this outrageous nonsense, which is why they have to dig their heals instead of accepting that their overlords might be misleading them.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

The "biological differences" argument is basically the smooth-brain special of sports debates. Yes, every human has biological differences—congratulations, you’ve grasped the absolute bare minimum of human anatomy. Do you want a gold star? If biological differences alone were enough to justify exclusion, then we'd need 47 different leagues to account for height, lung capacity, muscle density, fast-twitch fiber distribution, and every other physical variance that affects competition. But that’s not how sports work, and it never has been. Yet here you are, confidently shouting "BIOLOGY!" like a caveman who just discovered fire, as if that alone settles the debate.

or how about only two, male and female.

At the end of the day, “biological differences” is just the latest excuse people use when they don’t have a real argument. If your logic were consistent, you’d be banning every natural outlier from competition, but you’re not—because this was never about fairness. It’s about exclusion. So sure, keep yelling "Biology says so!" like a toddler who just learned a new word. Just don’t expect the rest of us to pretend you’ve said anything intelligent.

that is a real argument you goober.
men shouldn't be competing in female leagues.

 

[LMP]

Lmao you people are mindbroken, trying to justify the most idiotic positions.
There are verifiable, objective, significant differences between the sexes. If you don’t believe that, you shouldn’t support female leagues at all. This isn’t introducing a new way to segregate athletes and it isn’t just separating superior athletes, you hilarious child.

or how about only two, male and female.


that is a real argument you goober.
men shouldn't be competing in female leagues.

Biology isn’t the simple-ass “men are this, women are that” bullshit you think it is. There aren’t just two sexes. Sex is a fucking spectrum, and nature doesn’t give a shit about your little binary fantasy. Intersex people exist, hormone levels vary, and there’s a massive amount of overlap between men and women. Some women have more testosterone than some men. Some men are weaker, slower, and have worse endurance than plenty of women. If sex were just “XX or XY,” we wouldn’t see all this messy, biological gray area, but guess what? We do. Because biology isn’t some clean cut, color inside the lines nonsense, it’s chaotic as fuck.

Here’s the kicker, biology doesn’t draw hard lines, dumbasses do. If sports actually followed pure biology, we’d have dozens of categories, not just “men” and “women.” Instead, we make arbitrary rules based on what feels fair, not what is actually, scientifically absolute. You think men and women exist in two neat, separate little groups? That’s not just wrong. it’s lazy as fuck. Reality doesn’t care about your simple ass understanding of biology. Maybe try learning something before running your mouth.

 

[sanguinius]

Biology isn’t the simple-ass “men are this, women are that” bullshit you think it is. There aren’t just two sexes. Sex is a fucking spectrum, and nature doesn’t give a shit about your little binary fantasy. Intersex people exist, hormone levels vary, and there’s a massive amount of overlap between men and women. Some women have more testosterone than some men. Some men are weaker, slower, and have worse endurance than plenty of women. If sex were just “XX or XY,” we wouldn’t see all this messy, biological gray area, but guess what? We do. Because biology isn’t some clean cut, color inside the lines nonsense, it’s chaotic as fuck.

Here’s the kicker, biology doesn’t draw hard lines, dumbasses do. If sports actually followed pure biology, we’d have dozens of categories, not just “men” and “women.” Instead, we make arbitrary rules based on what feels fair, not what is actually, scientifically absolute. You think men and women exist in two neat, separate little groups? That’s not just wrong. it’s lazy as fuck. Reality doesn’t care about your simple ass understanding of biology. Maybe try learning something before running your mouth.

Fucking lol.

Are humans not bipedal because some people are born with birth defects? You are hilarious.

It is one thing for you insane cultists to pretend gender is even worth discussing, but now you are brain rotted enough to deny that there are two sexes. You can just see your brain melt in real time.

 

[sanguinius]

or how about only two, male and female.


that is a real argument you goober.
men shouldn't be competing in female leagues.

Some people are born with birth defects, so humans don't reproduce via a male impregnating a female anymore. It is a spectrum, don't you know? Don't you read science™ on reddit?

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Biology isn’t the simple-ass “men are this, women are that” bullshit you think it is. There aren’t just two sexes. Sex is a fucking spectrum, and nature doesn’t give a shit about your little binary fantasy. Intersex people exist, hormone levels vary, and there’s a massive amount of overlap between men and women. Some women have more testosterone than some men. Some men are weaker, slower, and have worse endurance than plenty of women. If sex were just “XX or XY,” we wouldn’t see all this messy, biological gray area, but guess what? We do. Because biology isn’t some clean cut, color inside the lines nonsense, it’s chaotic as fuck.

Here’s the kicker, biology doesn’t draw hard lines, dumbasses do. If sports actually followed pure biology, we’d have dozens of categories, not just “men” and “women.” Instead, we make arbitrary rules based on what feels fair, not what is actually, scientifically absolute. You think men and women exist in two neat, separate little groups? That’s not just wrong. it’s lazy as fuck. Reality doesn’t care about your simple ass understanding of biology. Maybe try learning something before running your mouth.

Sex is not a spectrum you halfwit. There's only two sexes. Male and female, all the rest is made up of anomalies from the binary.

Jesus Christ. You're too dumb for this conversation.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Some people are born with birth defects, so humans don't reproduce via a male impregnating a female anymore. It is a spectrum, don't you know? Don't you read science™ on reddit?

Saying there's more than two sexes is hilariously dumb.

 

[sanguinius]

Saying there's more than two sexes is hilariously dumb.

Like I said, liberalism is a cult. Either they can admit that they have been led astray and everything they have been taught has been ridiculous propaganda or they can double and triple down. It is easier to play pretend than it is to self-reflect.

 

[LMP]

Fucking lol.

Are humans not bipedal because some people are born with birth defects? You are hilarious.

Holy shit, have you ever taken a single biology class in your life? Because this is some next-level dumbassery.

Humans are meant to be bipedal. If someone isn’t, it’s because of an injury, mutation, or a condition that prevents walking. That’s a loss of function, not a natural variation. But intersex people? They’re not missing anything, they’re not broken, they’re just a naturally occurring part of human biology. Their traits exist in every population, across history, and even in other species. That’s not a defect, that’s just biology not fitting into your dumb little binary.

Calling intersex a “defect” is like saying left handed people have broken hands just because most people are right-handed. That’s how fucking stupid your argument is. So seriously, did you ever pass a biology class, or are you just making shit up as you go?

 

[LMP]

Saying there's more than two sexes is hilariously dumb.

Not as dumb as posting this comment to show your lack of education.

 

[sanguinius]

Holy shit, have you ever taken a single biology class in your life? Because this is some next-level dumbassery.

Humans are meant to be bipedal. If someone isn’t, it’s because of an injury, mutation, or a condition that prevents walking. That’s a loss of function, not a natural variation. But intersex people? They’re not missing anything, they’re not broken, they’re just a naturally occurring part of human biology. Their traits exist in every population, across history, and even in other species. That’s not a defect, that’s just biology not fitting into your dumb little binary.

Calling intersex a “defect” is like saying left handed people have broken hands just because most people are right-handed. That’s how fucking stupid your argument is. So seriously, did you ever pass a biology class, or are you just making shit up as you go?

XD

Humans are meant to be able to reproduce. If someone isn’t, it’s because of an injury, mutation, or a condition that prevents reproduction. That’s a loss of function, not a natural variation. But people born without limbs? They’re not missing anything, they’re not broken, they’re just a naturally occurring part of human biology. Their traits exist in every population, across history, and even in other species. That’s not a defect, that’s just biology not fitting into your dumb little binary.

Calling being born without limbs a “defect” is like saying left handed people have broken hands just because most people are right-handed. That’s how fucking stupid your argument is. So seriously, did you ever pass a biology class, or are you just making shit up as you go?

You should get into stand up comedy.

 

[LMP]

XD

Humans are meant to be able to reproduce. If someone isn’t, it’s because of an injury, mutation, or a condition that prevents reproduction. That’s a loss of function, not a natural variation. But people born without limbs? They’re not missing anything, they’re not broken, they’re just a naturally occurring part of human biology. Their traits exist in every population, across history, and even in other species. That’s not a defect, that’s just biology not fitting into your dumb little binary.

Calling being born without limbs a “defect” is like saying left handed people have broken hands just because most people are right-handed. That’s how fucking stupid your argument is. So seriously, did you ever pass a biology class, or are you just making shit up as you go?

You should get into stand up comedy.

Wow you are dumb, so now you’re trying to use reproduction as the defining line for biological sex? That’s fucking hilarious, considering not all men and women can reproduce either. Are you seriously going to sit there and argue that infertile men aren’t real men? That postmenopausal women suddenly stop being women? That anyone born sterile is now some kind of biological anomaly that doesn’t count? Because that’s exactly what your dumbass logic leads to.

Intersex people, just like cis men and women, have varying fertility levels. Some can reproduce, some can’t, just like plenty of non intersex people. But you don’t seem to have an issue with infertile cis people, do you? You’re not out here calling them defective or questioning whether they count as real men or women. You only pull this bullshit when it involves intersex or trans people. That’s not science, that’s just transparent, lazy-ass cherry-picking.

So which is it? If reproduction defines sex, then every infertile person is apparently an evolutionary mistake by your own logic. If it doesn’t, then you just admitted your entire argument is bullshit. I'm sure you did your own research though.

 

[sanguinius]

Wow you are dumb, so now you’re trying to use reproduction as the defining line for biological sex? That’s fucking hilarious, considering not all men and women can reproduce either. Are you seriously going to sit there and argue that infertile men aren’t real men? That postmenopausal women suddenly stop being women? That anyone born sterile is now some kind of biological anomaly that doesn’t count? Because that’s exactly what your dumbass logic leads to.

Intersex people, just like cis men and women, have varying fertility levels. Some can reproduce, some can’t, just like plenty of non intersex people. But you don’t seem to have an issue with infertile cis people, do you? You’re not out here calling them defective or questioning whether they count as real men or women. You only pull this bullshit when it involves intersex or trans people. That’s not science, that’s just transparent, lazy-ass cherry-picking.

So which is it? If reproduction defines sex, then every infertile person is apparently an evolutionary mistake by your own logic. If it doesn’t, then you just admitted your entire argument is bullshit. I'm sure you did your own research though.

Are you arguing that infertile people aren't that way due to injury, mutation, or a condition? Seems like you are! You adorable comedian, you, you almost had me going.

Your definition of sex, which is hilarious, btw, I'm going to be spreading this joke, applies 100% to humans not being a bipedal species. Maybe you should have gone to a real biology course instead of gender 101 taught by professor Arya shinediamond.

 

[sanguinius]

Here is a refresher course, for those here that have brainwashed themselves into ignoring basic biology.

 

[LMP]

Are you arguing that infertile people aren't that way due to injury, mutation, or a condition? Seems like you are! You adorable comedian, you, you almost had be going.

Your trolling is weak. Thinking the madlibs thing would work to prove your point. Pretty hilarious. You don't get to define the science on the matter.

 

[sanguinius]

Your trolling is weak. Thinking the madlibs thing would work to prove your point. Pretty hilarious. You don't get to define the science on the matter.

Neither does your gender professor, buttercup. There are two sexes, no matter how much you cry and try to convince yourself that you believe obvious nonsense.

 

[LMP]

Neither does your gender professor, buttercup. There are two sexes, no matter how much you cry and try to convince yourself that you believe obvious nonsense.

Funny how you can't wrap your mind around biological variations in humanity.

 

[sanguinius]

Funny how you can't wrap your mind around biological variations in humanity.

XD
Yeah, which is why we can't call humans bipedal. It is all just biological variations, there isn't a set norm for biological reasons! Your blue haired professor told you that thinking that is mean!