Banning guns wont do anything to solve this issue.
Banning unvetted Muslim immigration will definitely help solve Islamic terrorism in the West.
cuntiest of the cunts is schumer bringing up the budget after the attack
Banning guns wont do anything to solve this issue.
Banning unvetted Muslim immigration will definitely help solve Islamic terrorism in the West.
Aren't we witnessing the same helpless reactions from the right that they rightfully call out liberals for following Islamic terrorist attacks? Only with regard to guns?
Just asking.
Are you sure it's right-wingers doing the #PrayForVegas tweets? And you know for a fact it's the same people who mock leftists for the same nonsense after an Islamic terrorist attack?
Aren't we witnessing the same helpless reactions from the right that they rightfully call out liberals for following Islamic terrorist attacks? Only with regard to guns?
Just asking.
Heard it from a guy who was on another forum saying a dozen bumpfire stocks the morning after the attack. Thought he was a troll, giving him some credence for now, some other cuck said it on tucker carlson as well.Thanks. I didn't see that.
Where did you see he had 12 DD rifles?
No doubt he had a small fortune invested. Just didn't see it adding up to 100k.
i mean if you are a cunt too and can't see he was working the room and a lot of people were laughing...then ya, but you'd be a cuntis it worse than Trump telling Puerto Rico that they ruined his budget?
Banning guns would solve the problem. If there are no guns to shoot, then no one will get shot by guns.
Banning guns would solve the problem. If there are no guns to shoot, then no one will get shot by guns.
I thought you were a fan of judicial activism?The framers chose to write it that way as a consequence of states presumably not being able to call forth the militia to put down slave rebellions. The original wording utilized "Country", not "State". The entire discussion surrounding the 2A was as to what circumstances the militia could be called instead of whether or not keeping and bearing arms was to be enshrined for individuals.
It's been perverted into an individual right as we've disregarded their intention of not having a standing army, but to act as if it was intended to mean an individual right is a retcon born entirely out of Scalia's reasoning in DC vs Heller.
You guys are quoting the amendment without any of the historical context, much like Justice Scalia the "originalist" who couldn't find himself considering the initial intentions of the militia when broadly ruling that the 2A conferred an individual right.
Banning guns =/= no guns to shoot.Banning guns would solve the problem. If there are no guns to shoot, then no one will get shot by guns.
Banning guns wont do anything to solve this issue.
Banning unvetted Muslim immigration will definitely help solve Islamic terrorism in the West.
i mean if you are a cunt too and can't see he was working the room and a lot of people were laughing...then ya, but you'd be a cunt
Ah, the 'magic wand' argument.