LOL. She didn't even
have to. She didn't have to press the more woke aspects of her party's platform, and quietly pretending to disown or distance herself from her previous woke statements (like supporting taxpayer-funded transitional surgeries for prisoners) didn't fool anyone. It didn't work. Trump's campaign commercial skewering her for that has been heralded as possibly the most successful & effective campaign ad in political history.
Because, as we've cited over and over in the days since the election, tons of exit polls & surveys have shown that key swing voters, including demographics that shifted strongly in favor of Trump relative to 2020, avowed their distaste for wokeness as one of their central aversions to Harris and the Democratic party. This is congruent with the outcome of the election, so it's fair to assume the conclusions of these samples are accurate. But, okay, here, let's do this yet
again.
The survey from Blueprint Strategies comes amid a fierce Democratic debate over how they lost.
www.semafor.com
These voters—who remained open to persuasion until the very end—delivered not just a rejection of Harris but what they believed the Democratic Party stands for, absorbing right wing narratives.
blueprint2024.com
Here's the reality, sweetheart. The reality is the voters were smarter than the dumb-dumbs who run the Democratic party who thought they could pull a great switcheroo. They understood the Democrats weren't sincere when they pretended to be pro-border control and anti-woke only because they belatedly realized in the 11th hour that Americans hate this shit. The voters were wise to it. They understood the Democrats
showed them who they were for the past 10 years, and
saying they were something else in the last five minutes didn't count for much.
Smart voters. Dumb Democratic leaders. Dumb apologist progressive talking heads like Kulinski. Dumb karate forum wokesters.