Hey Keo, saw BabyEater's program and it looks really good, but also really unique (at least compared to the stuff I've read and "conventional wisdom"), like much of the stuff you do on your log, it seems to be a mixture of many training programs and ideals put together. I'm just wondering how you learnt all your stuff, do you have any background in personal training or any of those degrees/certs? Did you have anyone that you mostly learnt from and from which you take your approach, or are you mostly self-taught? If self-taught, then what resources did you use to acquire your level of knowledge? Also, how much do you "listen to your body" and train by feel? It seems to be quite a lot, and I'm wondering at what point you developed the confidence/self-awareness to do that, or if it was always like that with you?
Sorry for the rampage of questions, you don't have to answer them all or any at all. Thanks.
I don't have any background in personal training, and I'm definitely not certified, but I suppose I have a mind for long duree algorithmic systems, so programming makes sense to me on a conceptual level. Admittedly, I don't have the physiological know-how of a certified trainer, so I have to rely upon my experience as a participant and observer to talk about the biomechanics of a given lift.
So, yes, I'm mostly self-taught. Here's what I did: a couple of years ago, I started reading the popular training methodologies, and I eventually settled on Westside as the one I most favored. I read all of Louie's articles, followed by the Book of Methods, followed by his manuals. I watched every youtube video and seminar from him and his gym. I then read some of the old Soviet texts, which are part of the source material for the conjugate method. Later, I started reading old articles from EliteFTS and T-Nation. Finally, I would find the logs of lifters who I thought were intriguing, and I'd study their training.
Now, this occurred over a period of a couple of years, and it hasn't been as exhaustive as I'm presenting it; there are still many, many gaps in my knowledge.
I let training percentages guide the general trajectory of my training, but I train in a quasi-intuitive manner. I used to be more of a "listen to my body" trainee, but I have made better, more consistent progress by structuring my training more. I'm a believer in using training percentages in a baseline, but in not forgetting that an absolute max is different from a present-day max, and that training percentages should adhere to the later, not the former. So, if I'm feeling poorly, I'll train down; if I'm feeling great, I might push my percentages up. A few months ago, I started reading about Mike Tuchscherer's Reactive Training Systems, and one thing I took away from his approach was to keep a mental log of my rate of perceived exertion. It's something I'm always conscious of, even if it's not something I log, and it dictates how I handle all of my training.
Again, I have something of a mind for "long duree" algorithmic systems; I have a general sense of the rotation and periodization of my special exercises, even if it isn't pre-planned. I typically split the first half of my heavy training sessions between a main exercise (squat, bench press, and deadlift) and a main exercise variant (squat, bench press, and deadlift variant), and I train the former in a very systematic fashion, adhering to training percentages and deviating from them only when necessary, and I train the latter in a very intuitive fashion, doing what I feel best doing on that day. The balance, I find, works for me. My training sessions normally follow a SPP/GSPP/GPP (Specific/General-Specific/General) trajectory, which I got a year or so ago from Al Caslow's training log.
Anyway, this is another question that deserves a very long answer, so I'll just cut myself off here; if you want to know more, feel free to ask.