- Joined
- Mar 24, 2011
- Messages
- 7,475
- Reaction score
- 1,314
Such eloquent poetry for sherdog.
But I think we need to clarify - body control is one of the hearts of combat.
Grappling arts focus on this, in that sense Judo, freestyle,Greco and catch are all forms of 'wrestling'.
But this is the difference with regards martial arts- awareness of positions for submissions and strikes.
A clueless amateur wrestler who dives in to 'out wrestle' his opponent for a takedown in a fight but leaves his head exposed to a guilotine is akin to a child attempting to enter the man's world of combat.
In this regard, grappling systems designed with submissions in mind such as Judo are already incorporating that, which is why freestyle wrestlers must learn Judo positions (BJJ) to have any chance at being successful.
I think it was said by Olympic freestyle great Mark Schulz that "wrestling, is supposed to be submission wrestling"
Interestingly Schulz says he went 20 minutes with Rickson without getting tapped even not having submission experience. But he had learned a bit from Judo to keep his elbows in and chin tucked and this was enough to keep him safe.
https://www.bjjee.com/bjj-news/wres...tz-promoted-to-bjj-black-belt-by-pedro-sauer/
In that his point was made, and the history of freestyle in being a watered down version of catch originally supports this. Although I would say that safely controlling and throwing your opponent is an integral part of this also.
This is why one cannot stand seeing a BJJ tourney where one guy is clinging onto an arm while lifted upside down - oblivious to the fact he can be slammed into his head on the floor, utterly ridiculous and as unbalanced as a martial rookie freestyle wrestler leaving his neck open to a choke.
Judo, catch, and wrestlers trained in submissions present the natural return to what grappling was always supposed to be.
That's all fine enough, but the real point is the emotional animus underlaying the dynamic; vituperative 'nerds' who want to get their rocks off by counter-signaling against 'jocks' (who are usually good honest folk much preferable to have as a friend and comrade in life than such sorts of poisonous backbiters). 'Clueless amateurs' indeed.
Last edited: