• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kari Lake pulling ahead

Super_Nintendo said:
Any lost votes, real or hypothetical. Mandating that a malicious boogeyman exist before you can present any damages is the scam.

If an act of god caused machines to irreversibly flush half million Kari Lake votes, you weirdos would still say too bad, and you'd still win in court, but everyone knows that's bullshit.
Click to expand...
So you can't say that votes were actually lost, but you are confident that she won anyways.
 
Poon Goon said:
So you can't say that votes were actually lost, but you are confident that she won anyways.
Click to expand...

I didn't pay attention to the trial, but that's besides the issue. The court standard was fucked. If you order a pizza and you receive a pack a gum, you'd want a refund or them to make you a new one, regardless of whether someone fucked up or the delivery guy had a brain aneurysm. Broken machines, an act of god, or a failed process or procedure are just as damaging as a malicious boogeyman.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
What's funny to me is a bunch of guys cheering cause their political enemy had the impossible task of having to prove the Kennedy Assassination before they could show any evidence of damages in a civil case.
Click to expand...
Again with the fucking terrible analogies. In your scenario they would have a dead body as their evidence of assassination. Lake was just in court, she had no evidence to back up her claim.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
What's funny to me is a bunch of guys cheering cause their political enemy had the impossible task of having to prove the Kennedy Assassination before they could show any evidence of damages in a civil case.
Click to expand...
What proof of any kind did she have? This case was laughed out of court.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
I didn't pay attention to the trial, but that's besides the issue.
Click to expand...

No, I think that is precisely (a microcosm of) the issue.

You believe X, when asked to present proof of X to a neutral party, no evidence is submitted. Everyone else understands X to be baseless. You understand X to be the truth, despite zero evidence.

I'm sure another analogy is forthcoming where there is a dead pizza delivery guy and you want a refund because the delivery guy is Seth Rich - but at some point you have to rejoin us in reality.
 
Is Kari Lake still pulling ahead?
 
Super_Nintendo said:
I didn't pay attention to the trial, but that's besides the issue.
Click to expand...

LangfordBarrow said:
What proof of any kind did she have? This case was laughed out of court.
Click to expand...

well she did bring up those ballots that were an inch too small, even though they were still perfectly lawful ballots, and she tried to make the argument that those votes werent counted. that was her entire day one argument. and it got put to bed by one of their own people they brought in as a witness!

her own cyber expert she brought in, Clay Parikh - a speaker at Mike Lindell events (hows that for credibility?) - made an oopsie on the stand while being cross examined and he ended up destroying their own argument that kari lake was trying to make after he had a slip of the tongue and accidentilly admitted that those ballots were still counted.

after being asked whether or not those ballots were still counted, he started spewing poppycock and tried to dance his way out of answering that simple yes or no question 3 times in a row. and then the judge bitch slapped him, he even told the judge that he was unable to answer the question. and then he got asked the same question again and he got mad and accidentilly answered it! it turned out that he was able to answer the question all along. he just didn't want to answer the question because the answer destroys kari lake's entire argument! oopsies!

i guess kari lake won't be bringing this guy to court with her the next time she loses an election! next time they need to bring in better yes-men who wont answer any questions when their testimony comes under scrutiny in court! i dont know how they ever expect to win any legal cases like that, but at least they won't be committing friendly-fire on their entire legal team!

the next day they brought in one of the managers of the cyber ninjas, and some online pollster and survey dude who has an "F" rating by FiveThirtyEight, which was even brought up in front of the judge during court. and they gave some wackadoodle testimony about the chain of custody issues that kari lake's attorneys were trying to argue. it quickly got put to bed as well by other witnesses, poll workers and company managers that were brought in to be questioned. it all turned out to be hypothetical nonsense and hearsay. no evidence of any crime.

during the whole trial, kari lake's attorneys were looking like they were just interested in snagging a paycheck while her witnesses she brought in were bumbling around looking like they were trying to read off of a script. there didnt seem to be any authenticity resonating out of any one of the witnesses who were testifying. it reeked as if somebody else has told these witnesses what they were supposed to have witnessed, and what they were supposed to say during testimony. and the more questions they werea asked, the more they would unravel.

kari lake had to have known she was fucked and her entire case was over after katie hobbs' attorney washed his hands of clay parikh though. even though all the rest of these mike lindell and cyber ninja NPC's that kari lake dragged out of the GOP clown car and brought to the stand didn't help her case at all either when their testimony came under scrutiny.

there's your kari lake trial in a nutshell right there. nothing more. nothing less. but a whole lotta nothing, and we're still waiting on that evidence, and all of the kraken to be released.
 
Last edited:
FIMN said:
No, I think that is precisely (a microcosm of) the issue.

You believe X, when asked to present proof of X to a neutral party, no evidence is submitted. Everyone else understands X to be baseless. You understand X to be the truth, despite zero evidence.

I'm sure another analogy is forthcoming where there is a dead pizza delivery guy and you want a refund because the delivery guy is Seth Rich - but at some point you have to rejoin us in reality.
Click to expand...

they better check inside the boxes and look inside the pizza crust and under the cheese for some of those missing trump ballots. its still real to them dammit!
 
Poon Goon said:
Again with the fucking terrible analogies. In your scenario they would have a dead body as their evidence of assassination. Lake was just in court, she had no evidence to back up her claim.
Click to expand...

somebody needs to tell these chuds how the law works. if you are making allegations in court, you have to prove your case and back it up with evidence. you're not there to cast doubt or raise suspiscion about whether or not something might or might not have happened. thats what the people on the other side of the courtroom are there to do. you're there to prove that your allegations you are making are true and the crimes you are alleging actually happened.
 
Last edited:
this fine pile of maga trash lost his election, lost his lawsuit, lost his recount, and now he wants to lose some more. relentless little bugger this one is.



their new slogan should be "We Will Not Stop Losing!"
 
idrankyourbeer said:
this fine pile of maga trash lost his election, lost his lawsuit, lost his recount, and now he wants to lose some more. relentless little bugger this one is.



their new slogan should be "We Will Not Stop Losing!"
Click to expand...

they think if they take bullshit to court enough times, everyone will get tired of it and give in, its the same with certain posters on here and in the ukraine thread, i call it the pestering toddler approach.
 
curryjunkie said:
they think if they take bullshit to court enough times, everyone will get tired of it and give in, its the same with certain posters on here and in the ukraine thread, i call it the pestering toddler approach.
Click to expand...
Well Kari's lawyers are getting sanctioned for their bullshit lawsuit.
I think you are going to see more of that, which is the reason Donny has such a hard time finding lawyers plus the fact he stiffs them.
Covid Farting Rudy, lost his license because of his bullshit lawsuits.
There will always be lawyers willing to roll the dice for a payout, but not a good one.
 
Limit Smasher said:
Democrats are fucked.

They just can't seem to understand that the average person isn't energized by the abortion debate.

Nobody who is normal supports killing babies and these retard democrats are making their whole platform about a woman's right to kill her baby.
Click to expand...
So did Kari win or was it stolen. You don’t care about abortions all of a sudden, you act like you do to support your clan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,547
Messages
58,374,711
Members
176,016
Latest member
50 caliber beer bottle

Share this page

Back
Top