Karen Read Trial

[floivanus]

Yeah she def did it … but people like conspiracy theories…. But she was drunk and hit him… she didn’t mean to kill him but she def did

No broken bones, no major bruising, several medical experts who say “ no signs of a car accident” a police witness who says the tail light wasn’t broken, just missing a small piece when he picked it up, and even the Medical Examiner said there was no signs of a car accident on the body.

Not to mention the obvious dog bites on his right arm.

 

[fingercuffs]

Watched the doc on Netfix and I'm aware it was shot for entertainment.

I think she did it but the Defence was so good at promoting reasonable doubt, and the prosecution was out of their league. It was Prime Bones Jones vs a local amateur WW.

If you go through the actual evidence, no way she did it.

Edit: give me your top 5

 

[fingercuffs]

What I want now, is to prove the cover up and get it taken out of state. Too close for it to be unbiased in Boston. He still died, now let's get him some justice.

 

[fingercuffs]

No broken bones, no major bruising, several medical experts who say “ no signs of a car accident” a police witness who says the tail light wasn’t broken, just missing a small piece when he picked it up, and even the Medical Examiner said there was no signs of a car accident on the body.

Not to mention the obvious dog bites on his right arm.

Where was the dog?

 

[fingercuffs]

I fucking knew Sherdog gonna Sherdog again, why do I ever let sense prevail?

 

[Scerpi]

What I want now, is to prove the cover up and get it taken out of state. Too close for it to be unbiased in Boston. He still died, now let's get him some justice.

Foxes in the Hen House

 

[fingercuffs]

Foxes in the Hen House

I won't say who or where but many a cop in many a state and city's drunk drive. Just the culture, especially there. Last cop I went out drinking I said "gonna UBER?" and he said "it"s alright, I'll be fine" after tanking 3 DIPAs with us haha.
I'm not judging.

 

[Roids]

No broken bones, no major bruising, several medical experts who say “ no signs of a car accident” a police witness who says the tail light wasn’t broken, just missing a small piece when he picked it up, and even the Medical Examiner said there was no signs of a car accident on the body.

Not to mention the obvious dog bites on his right arm.

It's a major logic flaw to assume their must be broken bones or bruising in a low speed hit by a car especially someone wearing heavy clothing. She literally confessed to hitting him when she returned to the crime scene the next morning at 6am.

The cult support she has is disturbing. Imagine if it was the other way around and John was the one aquitted of her murder in the same circumstances. Would the reaction be the same? This case proves most people are morons.

They believe 12 friends who were cops and EMS just all decided on the spot to commit serious felonies and risk life in jail just to protect 1 person, and trust no one ever spills the beans? lmao.

 

[Roids]

Foxes in the Hen House

Not a single medical expert called by the defense, or called by the Commonwealth, has testified that John O’Keefe was hit by a car. Not one.

This is slimy work from the defense. No one could definitely say he was hit by a car but nobody could also exclude it. If it was low speed then it could happen without injuries. For the muppets wo think she is innocent, how do they think he died?

 

[Darkballs]

How to get away with an obvious murder in the United States:

Step 1: Be a white woman.

That is all.

 

[Jar of Flies]

How to get away with an obvious murder in the United States:

Step 1: Be a white woman.

That is all.

Or a retired athlete.

 

[floivanus]

It's a major logic flaw to assume their must be broken bones or bruising in a low speed hit by a car especially someone wearing heavy clothing. She literally confessed to hitting him when she returned to the crime scene the next morning at 6am.

The cult support she has is disturbing. Imagine if it was the other way around and John was the one aquitted of her murder in the same circumstances. Would the reaction be the same? This case proves most people are morons.

They believe 12 friends who were cops and EMS just all decided on the spot to commit serious felonies and risk life in jail just to protect 1 person, and trust no one ever spills the beans? lmao.

nobody ever said or reported her saying “I hit him” in the initial reports from that day, there’s dash cam footage of all the interactions she had with EMS and police that day, and when it’s alleged that she said that, she clearly asks if he got hit, not that she did hit him.

 

[floivanus]

This is slimy work from the defense. No one could definitely say he was hit by a car but nobody could also exclude it. If it was low speed then it could happen without injuries. For the muppets wo think she is innocent, how do they think he died?

The commonwealth’s own medical examiner said it wasn’t a car accident and that there wasn’t any impact site on his body.

The defense brought forth 4 expert witnesses who said it wasn’t a car accident, and the “accident reconstructionist” the prosecution brought forth said that his arm would suffer broken bones, but he couldn’t say what it looked like because there weren’t any taken from John O Keefe, when there were and the Commonwealth chose to not recall that expert when the defense entered the X-Rays into evidence.

 

[Confucamus]

How to get away with an obvious murder in the United States:

Step 1: Be a white woman.

That is all.

lmao You dope. You know nothing about this case if you think that.

 

[Roids]

The commonwealth’s own medical examiner said it wasn’t a car accident and that there wasn’t any impact site on his body.

The defense brought forth 4 expert witnesses who said it wasn’t a car accident, and the “accident reconstructionist” the prosecution brought forth said that his arm would suffer broken bones, but he couldn’t say what it looked like because there weren’t any taken from John O Keefe, when there were and the Commonwealth chose to not recall that expert when the defense entered the X-Rays into evidence.

Listen carefully. None of them could exclude him being hit by a car. Some of them just concluded he was not hit by a car, and anyone knows defense witnesses are biased as hell. It should be obvious to anyone with common sense that being hit at very low speed by a car can result in no injuries from the car impact. The prosecution claim is he was just knocked over, not hit at high speed. This was a red herring and fooled so many.

 

[Jar of Flies]

Listen carefully. None of them could exclude him being hit by a car. Some of them just concluded he was not hit by a car, and anyone knows defense witnesses are biased as hell. It should be obvious to anyone with common sense that being hit at very low speed by a car can result in no injuries from the car impact. The prosecution claim is he was just knocked over, not hit at high speed. This was a red herring and fooled so many.

I lean towards her hitting him with the car, but I’m just curious here, if he wasn’t injured from being hit by the car, what caused his death?

 

[Roids]

nobody ever said or reported her saying “I hit him” in the initial reports from that day, there’s dash cam footage of all the interactions she had with EMS and police that day, and when it’s alleged that she said that, she clearly asks if he got hit, not that she did hit him.

10 people testified she said she hit him or it was her fault 'i did it' Are you REALLY suggesting 10 different people who did not know each other all conspired to lie and frame her, or misheard the exact same thing?

 

[Roids]

I lean towards her hitting him with the car, but I’m just curious here, if he wasn’t injured from being hit by the car, what caused his death?

The prosecution argued he was knocked over, fell backwards and cracked the back of his head. A very plausible incident, but apparently a massive conspiracy involving almost a dozen people was more plausible to the idiotic jury.

 

[Cartiac]

Listen carefully. None of them could exclude him being hit by a car. Some of them just concluded he was not hit by a car, and anyone knows defense witnesses are biased as hell. It should be obvious to anyone with common sense that being hit at very low speed by a car can result in no injuries from the car impact. The prosecution claim is he was just knocked over, not hit at high speed. This was a red herring and fooled so many.

What does your statement have to do with anything? There were major injuries to John's body and the prosecution absolutely claimed they were due to being hit at high speed as they claimed the impact supposedly completely destroy the tail light and left a "debris field" on the front lawn.

 

[Roids]

What does your statement have to do with anything? There were major injuries to John's body and the prosecution absolutely claimed they were due to being hit at high speed as they claimed the impact supposedly completely destroy the tail light and left a "debris field" on the front lawn.

Not true. The head injury was from falling and hitting his head on the concrete. She knocked him over while reversing drunk. End of story. She even confessed.