• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kamala Harris indicates she might run again

First woman president in America will be a republican is one of my takes.
Democrats, as they are now, simply can't find women candidates that aren't
- supremely annoying
- diversity hires
- woke scolding and nagging
- holding the baggage of having to acknowledge all the horseshit extreme ideas of their party

all of these make a woman president from the left extremely repulsive for most voters. and if you couldn't get a woman president when FUCKING DONALD TRUMP was the candidate, you won't do it against some regular dude republican that makes the other candidate look like a fucking nut

LOL at this dumbshit take.

First, supremely annoying, woke and scolding Hillary beat Trump by 3 million votes.

Second, "regular Republican dudes" got their ass whooped by Trump in the last two Republican primaries. The 2024 primaries weren't even close. Trump obliterated Cruz, Rubio and anyone else. Conservatives don't want a regular Republican, they want an outrageous, mouthy, outsider that tells it like it is and insults the libs and gives nicknames to his enemies, etc.

Good luck finding another one of those in 2028. And good luck finding a female Republican that does any of that in any of our lifetimes.
 
It's quite clear that America is not ready to elect a female President. Even the DEMs aren't stupid enough to trot her out again.
It has nothing to do with being female but more to do with the historically unlikeable Hillary and a DEI Kamala. If the Dems actually focused on better policies rather than identity politics they might make some progress... and I dont see that happening anytime soon.
 
Agreed. Trump was beatable but not by her. She may try a primary again but she wont survive it for nothing else than the fact that she didnt wow anyone the last time. Likely she is just remaining relevant and selling her book.
By who? There is absolutely NO ONE the dems could roll out. Kamala was their best choice and we saw how well that went. They wouldn't even let her talk to people. Her handlers literally put a gag order on her under-qualified, rambling ass.
 
LOL at this dumbshit take.

First, supremely annoying, woke and scolding Hillary beat Trump by 3 million votes.

Second, "regular Republican dudes" got their ass whooped by Trump in the last two Republican primaries. The 2024 primaries weren't even close. Trump obliterated Cruz, Rubio and anyone else. Conservatives don't want a regular Republican, they want an outrageous, mouthy, outsider that tells it like it is and insults the libs and gives nicknames to his enemies, etc.

Good luck finding another one of those in 2028. And good luck finding a female Republican that does any of that in any of our lifetimes.
Are you not gonna mention that Hillary pulled the ol' Russian Collusion lie (and it worked on many of you), Govt censorship in all social medias (to lie to the gullible portion of the country), and control of the entire MSM.... and still couldn't fool all of us (but they got you didn't they?)
 
By who? There is absolutely NO ONE the dems could roll out. Kamala was their best choice and we saw how well that went. They wouldn't even let her talk to people. Her handlers literally put a gag order on her under-qualified, rambling ass.
I dont think she was a good candidate anyway and would have lost no matter. Whether they could have pressured Biden more before the wheels fell off who knows to get a primary done but they likely were thinking Biden was going to beat Trump then step down at some point and it was Kamalas. He just tanked and they were out of time. Anyway, I dont think she wins a primary if she does run
 
Republicans don't have a shot in 2028. They are pissing off too many people so apathy won't save them. Only retards will want the same course and every is seeing through the bullshit.
 
Who even is the front runner for the Democratic Party? It’s been a rough year and a half for them, as far as rebuilding the party goes the worst thing they could do is run a far lefty lunatic as that won’t get them any moderate votes.

Im also doubting public confidence in them and think people will overall be a lot more suspicious after the Joe Biden debacle.
Kamala overall is an atrocious public speaker and lacks the charisma to make up for it like Trump has, her running essentially would be Hillary 2.0 without the party backing.

Also I don’t think many people would vote for a woman, women seem to fuck up anything they touch when placed in positions like CEO of companies and stuff like that. I hate to be that guy but not much good comes from putting women in positions of power like that, they make to many decisions based on emotions not logic.
 
She’s going to run against this guy lol they can do fake accents and made up stories in debates, it will be fun



This shit combined with his twitter account trying to parody trump is so embarrassing, does he have so little faith in himself as a person he chooses to be a clown instead?
 
Are you not gonna mention that Hillary pulled the ol' Russian Collusion lie (and it worked on many of you), Govt censorship in all social medias (to lie to the gullible portion of the country), and control of the entire MSM.... and still couldn't fool all of us (but they got you didn't they?)

Whatever she "pulled" is irrelevant to the topic.

The topic is that even an unlikable woman like Hillary beat the elected president by 3 million votes so a Democrat woman actually winning is much of a possibility than a Republican woman, who has never even come close to winning a primary, let alone the presidency.
 
Whatever she "pulled" is irrelevant to the topic.

The topic is that even an unlikable woman like Hillary beat the elected president by 3 million votes so a Democrat woman actually winning is much of a possibility than a Republican woman, who has never even come close to winning a primary, let alone the presidency.
I'm convinced a hard line party GOP woman, who hits all the right virtue signals and has the backing of the media machine, could 100% win the presidency. They would just need a weak enough primary field, and post-Trump (if/when we ever get such a thing) could have the right elements.
 
I'm convinced a hard line party GOP woman, who hits all the right virtue signals and has the backing of the media machine, could 100% win the presidency. They would just need a weak enough primary field, and post-Trump (if/when we ever get such a thing) could have the right elements.

Really? I just don't see it.

It'd definitely have to be a hardliner because that's what Trump has set in motion. I just think that MAGAism has traditional masculinity and paternalism as as such crucial part of its philosophy that no woman could capture enough believers. Women are to be supporters of their men, not leaders.

And the few women that are enthusiastically MAGA (MGT, Boebert) are also very low-IQ so they'd have a hell of a time navigating through a full campaign with all the landmines that are there.
 
Really? I just don't see it.

It'd definitely have to be a hardliner because that's what Trump has set in motion. I just think that MAGAism has traditional masculinity and paternalism as as such crucial part of its philosophy that no woman could capture enough believers. Women are to be supporters of their men, not leaders.

And the few women that are enthusiastically MAGA (MGT, Boebert) are also very low-IQ so they'd have a hell of a time navigating through a full campaign with all the landmines that are there.
Sure, but there is an extreme, deep seeded resentment over The Left getting to rhetorically own the notion of electing the first black person. That resentment would be multiplied unbearably if we elected a woman. It would be quite the coup to take it off the table, and we would never hear the end of it. "They call us sexist, but we elected a woman". Dude, that would get a ton of mileage.
 
I'm convinced a hard line party GOP woman, who hits all the right virtue signals and has the backing of the media machine, could 100% win the presidency. They would just need a weak enough primary field, and post-Trump (if/when we ever get such a thing) could have the right elements.

I think Nikki Haley would have dusted Biden in a H2H
 
Really? I just don't see it.

It'd definitely have to be a hardliner because that's what Trump has set in motion. I just think that MAGAism has traditional masculinity and paternalism as as such crucial part of its philosophy that no woman could capture enough believers. Women are to be supporters of their men, not leaders.

And the few women that are enthusiastically MAGA (MGT, Boebert) are also very low-IQ so they'd have a hell of a time navigating through a full campaign with all the landmines that are there.

I think the MAGAs hate Libs even more than whatever their deep feelings are for women, i think they'd put those feelings aside to own the libs

also they would love the faux moral high ground of being the first party to elect a female Prez

agree that the MAGA women are too dumb, though
 
I think the MAGAs hate Libs even more than whatever their deep feelings are for women, i think they'd put those feelings aside to own the libs

also they would love the faux moral high ground of being the first party to elect a female Prez

agree that the MAGA women are too dumb, though
This right here
 
Just trying to get a feel for how the lefties view this:

Do any of you guys think Kamala running again would be a good idea? Or should she just fade away?
 
Just trying to get a feel for how the lefties view this:

Do any of you guys think Kamala running again would be a good idea? Or should she just fade away?

do we need to even ask the question?
 
do we need to even ask the question?
So... not a good idea?

I dunno man I really can't read the left anymore that's why I'm asking. Just curious on what you guys think about it.
 
Back
Top