Elections Kamala Harris indicates she might run again

cottagecheesefan said:
Democrats floating a Kamala - AOC as the future
Click to expand...
Horrific idea all around, but please -- by all means, let it happen. Question is, what do the returdlicans retort with? :)

Apologies -- had to take the "FLOATING" thing and roll with it...

4RHSvZ5.gif
 
Crazy Source said:
And let's not beat around the bush, giggity. America isn't ready for a female President no mater her qualifications. The only outlier to make it is Obama, and he's the whitest black man in America. After Obama it went right back to white males. This isn't me making a judgement on the American voter. I'm just calling balls and strikes here.
Click to expand...
That's where I think you're wrong. But the party can't pick the person... the people have to pick the person. It couldn't have been any black man that they ran it had to be Barack Obama who won easily twice. The party should have run Joe Biden after that but decided to go with Hillary because she's a woman. The problem is she's just as polarizing as Trump (though she came close). Then you had Joe Biden pick Kamala referencing picking a black woman for VP which was not a good look. Then she is also not a good public speaker. I never would have thought Herman Cain would have led in any polls for the GOP but he did until some of the sex scandal fallout. Ultimately this has to play out naturally and the natural game changer step up to the plate. Not a fabricated one
 
Edit- @Cajun I forgot to tag you, lol.

I'm aware of how these things played out. I stand by by belief that America is not ready to elect a female President, no matter her qualifications. And I don't put much stock into Cain leading in the polls that early in the season. He wasn't going to make it through regardless of his scandal.
 
Last edited:
Crazy Source said:
I'm aware of how these things played out. I stand by by belief that America is not ready to elect a female President, no matter her qualifications.
Click to expand...
This is the answer. Misogyny is still pretty prevalent in our society and I don't think that is going to change for awhile.

Even if Kamala does run she will lose in the primaries. She barely got any votes in the last primary
 
Satanical Eve said:
This is the answer. Misogyny is still pretty prevalent in our society and I don't think that is going to change for awhile.

Even if Kamala does run she will lose in the primaries. She barely got any votes in the last primary
Click to expand...
When I talked or heard people talking about Hillary the main gripe was that "she's a bitch", lol. Seriously. It wasn't policy positions. It was that she was too "uppity". Hey @Cajun I used the word "uppity", lol. Trump is the biggest prick on the planet (prick being the male equivalent of being a bitch) but you don't hear that criticism. It's almost seen as a strength in males.
 
Biden appointed her at a time when the Me Too and BLM movements were at their height; it was never because she was a good candidate. She recently was close to running for governor of CA until she found out the donors wouldn't give her campaign money for it.

Kamala has surged recently and is at the top of polling for the Dem nomination. It won't hold though; it's only because all of the Dem candidates haven't jumped in the race yet.

The Reps will be having a party if she wins the nomination since she will never win a national election.

The Dems will have trouble finding a winner, and it certainly won't be her. I think it will be Whitmer, Newsom, or Shapiro as the nominee. Newsom or Shapiro have the best chance to win.
 
Crazy Source said:
When I talked or heard people talking about Hillary the main gripe was that "she's a bitch", lol. Seriously. It wasn't policy positions. It was that she was too "uppity". Hey @Cajun I used the word "uppity", lol. Trump is the biggest prick on the planet (prick being the male equivalent of being a bitch) but you don't hear that criticism. It's almost seen as a strength in males.
Click to expand...
Gotta use that word where we can lol. Hillary still won the popular vote though so it wasn't like she lost in a landslide. Again it just has to play out naturally and she is polarizing.
 
Cajun said:
Gotta use that word where we can lol. Hillary still won the popular vote though so it wasn't like she lost in a landslide. Again it just has to play out naturally and she is polarizing.
Click to expand...
It’s her fault Trump won. Biden should’ve ran and he’d have beaten him in 2016. Somehow she convinced the DNC it was her turn. The “most qualified candidate in history”. Nah

Since then the DNC just keeps becoming more of a joke. They actually think their key back to relevance is doubling down on batshit far left nonsense that most of us can’t stand anymore. That shit works in NYC and California, but you need more than just the retard vote.
 
Last edited:
UberHere said:
It’s her fault Trump won. Biden should’ve ran and he’d have beaten him in 2016. Somehow she convinced the DNC it was her turn. The “most qualified candidate in history”. Nah

Since then the DNC just keeps becoming more of a joke. They actually think their key back to relevance is doubling down on batshit far left nonsense that most of us can’t stand anymore. That shit works in NYC and California, but you need more than just the retard vote.
Click to expand...
I think the DNC itself wants to keep breaking barriers but you have to have the right person and they have to naturally rise to the top like Obama did. Biden would definitely have beaten Trump in 16. People think the US isn't ready for a woman but Hillary did win the popular vote so it was close. But it's not just that you have any random woman you have to have the right woman or the right man or the right minority person. It can't be forced or you're going to lose every time like they have.
 
Cajun said:
Agreed. Trump was beatable but not by her. She may try a primary again but she wont survive it for nothing else than the fact that she didnt wow anyone the last time. Likely she is just remaining relevant and selling her book.
Click to expand...
In all fairness she had 3 months to campaign if that.

As of right now, I've kinda got my heart set on Shapiro and Kinzinger.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
First woman president in America will be a republican is one of my takes.
Democrats, as they are now, simply can't find women candidates that aren't
- supremely annoying
- diversity hires
- woke scolding and nagging
- holding the baggage of having to acknowledge all the horseshit extreme ideas of their party

all of these make a woman president from the left extremely repulsive for most voters. and if you couldn't get a woman president when FUCKING DONALD TRUMP was the candidate, you won't do it against some regular dude republican that makes the other candidate look like a fucking nut
Click to expand...
Japan elected their first female prime minister and no surprise she is right wing. Leftists women come across as very condescending and all the things you mentioned above.
 
fingercuffs said:
In all fairness she had 3 months to campaign if that.

As of right now, I've kinda got my heart set on Shapiro and Kinzinger.
Click to expand...
I get it but she wasn't really good in interviews. Adam Kinzinger? Dont know him well. Shapiro is a strong candidate and much more moderate. If this Israel thing gets settled pretty quick there probably won't be any negative ramifications. Not that he represents the government of Israel but you know how idiots are at times. His support for israel may not play well if its too soon. The Democrats have promising candidates they can put forward. They just need to quit trying to force candidates in there.
 
White Whale said:
Japan elected their first female prime minister and no surprise she is right wing. Leftists women come across as very condescending and all the things you mentioned above.
Click to expand...
So do leftist “men”.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
Democrats floating a Kamala - AOC as the future
Click to expand...

You know, I don't think anyone would disagree that Sarah Palin was a dumb cunt & completely unqualified for the job, but Kamala & AOC are even more retarded & incompetent. And yet the Dems are still telling us they're the best people for the job, like how fucking deluded & out of touch with reality are they? Seriously. And then they call everyone who disagrees a racist, sexist, retarded and all kinds of other shit while insisting the dumb cunts are fully qualified & fit for the job. I mean, FFS I'm an actual Liberal, as in I vote for the Liberal party in Canada in most elections, and those dumbass Dems have completely lost me. If I were an American I'd just write in Cthulhu every 4 years.
 
joy2day said:
Biden appointed her at a time when the Me Too and BLM movements were at their height; it was never because she was a good candidate. She recently was close to running for governor of CA until she found out the donors wouldn't give her campaign money for it.

Kamala has surged recently and is at the top of polling for the Dem nomination. It won't hold though; it's only because all of the Dem candidates haven't jumped in the race yet.

The Reps will be having a party if she wins the nomination since she will never win a national election.

The Dems will have trouble finding a winner, and it certainly won't be her. I think it will be Whitmer, Newsom, or Shapiro as the nominee. Newsom or Shapiro have the best chance to win.
Click to expand...
I love Shapiro, but a Jewish person at the top of the ticket won't work. Another thing America isn't ready for, lol. At VP it may work perfectly, taking a very important swing state in the election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,120
Messages
58,341,977
Members
176,007
Latest member
MehmetAliFERAL

Share this page

Back
Top