• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

Come Nov 5th, we'll find out. Until then, none of the partisan tweets for either side will mean a damn thing.
They do mean something though. It's clear they provide comfort to @ShadowRun since he seems to hate what is going on at the DNC and needs to share the tweets here to make himself feel better.
 
They do mean something though. It's clear they provide comfort to @ShadowRun since he seems to hate what is going on at the DNC and needs to share the tweets here to make himself feel better.
Eh, partisanship is real, on both sides. I choose these people, so i notice it more when they do it, etc.

I just prefer intelligent gotchas. Forced tweets look sad.
 
Lol
1000009586-jpg.1059371
 
AOC is a good sport.
 
Man, you sure follow a lot of retards on Twitter...

Every day its a new cope post from some MAGA nobody
This is going to be her reputation long terms if Trump wins or loses.

She is lab built to be unpopular.
 
Comrade Kamala needing fake actors to bring the joy lol


<{outtahere}>
So, what's the alleged story here?

There is a line of vans following the Vice President of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA to the biggest political convention of her party..and they're paid actors? No personal staff? Campaign staff? Security? Family? Event organizers?

And then a restaurant kicked out PAYING customers in the middle of their meal in order to sit these "paid actors"? lol How did that conversation go?

lol If you guys just took literally a second to actually think about what you read and see, it should raise some questions in your mind. None of this shit makes any sense.
On one hand, you guys will say that Democrats are brainless, cult followers, but if that's the case, why would we need "paid actors" to pretend to fan-girl for Kamala?
"Guy in a Trump shirt said something, so must be true"

Another BRICK
 
Why do we have to consider historic polling data from 4 years ago when we can look at current data from today? It's not being ignored, it's just polling data from 4 years ago is irrelevant to the current contest.

Jgpv0uu.png



Your logic is also flawed, that polling was in comparison to the previous VP Biden.

Now we have current polling data in comparison to Trump after his disaster term in office.

Hope this helps.
She wasn't liked by her OWN party. She lost her own primaries. She was thrown under the bus for her handling of the border and her terrible interviews where she made an ass of herself. Her take on Ukraine, Inflation, the border were all lambasted by even liberal media before she became the nominee. THE ONLY reason she is polling better now is because "anyone but Trump" and there being no other choice.

Dozens of articles like this showing how unlikeable she was before Biden was ousted:
"Vice President Kamala Harris’s net favorability has hit a record low. According to an NBC poll conducted in June, Harris has a net rating of -17, marking the lowest rating for any vice president in history of the poll.

Approximately 1,000 respondents participated in the poll and found that 49% of registered voters have a negative view of Harris, while 32% have a positive outlook on the VP."
 
She wasn't liked by her OWN party. She lost her own primaries. She was thrown under the bus for her handling of the border and her terrible interviews where she made an ass of herself. Her take on Ukraine, Inflation, the border were all lambasted by even liberal media before she became the nominee. THE ONLY reason she is polling better now is because "anyone but Trump" and there being no other choice.

Dozens of articles like this showing how unlikeable she was before Biden was ousted:
"Vice President Kamala Harris’s net favorability has hit a record low. According to an NBC poll conducted in June, Harris has a net rating of -17, marking the lowest rating for any vice president in history of the poll.

Approximately 1,000 respondents participated in the poll and found that 49% of registered voters have a negative view of Harris, while 32% have a positive outlook on the VP."

Yeah but compared to DonOLD she's polling a lot more favorably
 
Back
Top