- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,449
- Reaction score
- 38,700
Not sure why he froze a few EO's of Trumps that did this. I am guessing because it would of made Trump look good
-
Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here
Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS
- Thread starter Vampire life
- Start date
Not sure why he froze a few EO's of Trumps that did this. I am guessing because it would of made Trump look good
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
- Messages
- 175,530
- Reaction score
- 258,850
If you read your own article, you'd see why:
Either way, whether it be Trump, Biden, Kamala, the holy spirit or JD Vance fucking couches, whatever makes medication cheaper, I'm all for it. Americans pay far too much for medication as is.
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,449
- Reaction score
- 38,700
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
that's nice skeeter. you didn't administer the test, and quite frankly you come off as being stupid as shit, so nobody cares what you think her IQ is. are you gonna provide a source for any of that IQ sperging that you did? you told us that her IQ is 110, right before telling us that you dont even know if she's ever taken an IQ test, so let's see it.
her IQ scores are not revealed to the public. you are simply just making up rubbish. quit embarrassing yourself, homie.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
imagine pretending to care for people being qualified for a job position while voting in 2016 for a rapist with no prior experience in politics whatsoever to be your nations president. clutch them pearls, chicken boy.
you can't ever take these disingenuous chucklefucks seriously for anything that they ever say. everything they ever try to argue is always in bad faith.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
First, there were no credible rape aligations of Trump in 2016.
Second, name Hillary Clinton's successes as a politician that qualifies her to be qualified to be President.
Third, Trump built a successful corporation within the private sector including a hotel franchise empire and hundreds of successful businesses equating a multi-billion dollar net worth.... so yes, that qualifies himself to be be more qualified to be President than any uniparty bureaucrat.
Fourth, there still has been no credible rape aligations against Trump, because all credible rape aligations include two criteria -
*A police report.
*Physical Evidence.
And don't pretend like you'd believe the rape aligations of a politician you like without those two criteria present. We all know you're a political hack who has different standards for the politicians you like and the politicians you dislike.
Agreed. I can ever take you disingenuous chucklefucks seriously for anything you say. Everything you try to argue is always in bad faith.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
hey chicken boy, learn how to spell common 3'rd grade english words. secondly, donald trump is a rapist. there, i said it. what are you gonna do about it? i'll tell you what you are going to do chicken boy. you ain't gonna do shit but twist yourself into a pretzel trying to defend a rapist, even though you know just as much as everybody else knows that your rapist messiah is a rapist.but hey at least he's not a bad golfer!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
also, terrible 3'rd grade spelling aside, if there was no credible "rape aligations" made against molestini cheetolini, then he wouldn't have lost his sexual battery and defamation lawsuits and he wouldn't have been ordered to pay his rape victim nearly 100 million dollars.
you do such a piss poor job of defending that fraudy orange rapist for free that you should join his legal team!
the juries found the "aligations" credible. deal with it.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
Wow... so emotional when pointing out facts that dispell all delusions of the credibility of your talking points.
Reality Check - E Jean Carroll provided no physical evidence with the alligations for rape. She didn't file a police report back in 1995 or 1996 (she doesn't recall the year) the 'rape' supposedly took place.
You can't find an example of an actual rape victim that cannot even recall the actual year the rape took place.
"I don't feel like a victim."
"This was not sexual."
Cooper - "I think most people think of rape as a violent assault."
Carroll - "I think most people think of rape as being sexy."
[Stares weirdly at Cooper, a gay man]
"Think of the fantasies."
Holy fucking shit every leftist who's repeating the 'Trump is a rapist' talking point ruins their own credibility by claiming you view this woman as credible. You don't have any deductive reasoning whatsoever, you're told to believe 'Trump is a rapist' and not only do you believe it, you parrot it like mindless NPCs.
Reason #21372, why no one takes you leftists seriously.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
i didn't read this but imagine twisting yourself into a pretzel this hard just to defend a rapist lol.
hey i know it was too hard of a question for you to answer when i asked you 5 times if i unwantedly shoved my cock in your moms ass and shoved a broken broom handle up your wifes twat while i was in the state of new york, would you consider me a rapist? (lol hard question!) but lets try this one...if the fraudy orange rapist were to forcefully shove his fingers up your wife's twat on 5'th avenue with you right there watching, would you still give him your vote, and your moral support?
just curious. because deep down i believe that you probably would. being in a cult and all, i know that the first question was much too hard for you to answer, but maybe you can clarify this one for me. after all, you are to be taken seriously and you're not just posting in bad faith right? so how do you really feel about it there cluckles?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 34,846
- Reaction score
- 72,948
that's not a very clear answer from you there, cluckles the clown. so would you finally draw a line in the sand, or would you just sit in the cuck chair and watch it play out?
i mean i know what i would put my money on, but perhaps you could convince me otherwise.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2006
- Messages
- 14,960
- Reaction score
- 17,451
If you want a good laugh look at him getting dunked on this thread. Dude spent hours defending Dr. Disrespect sexting a minor. This dude has a history of defending freaks. He's so hyper-partisan that he'll defend literally anything if someone on his team does it. Disgusting poster honestly.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/dr-disrespect-banned-from-twitch.4116941/page-25
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 56,549
- Reaction score
- 38,534
A candidate with 34 felony convictions, a convicted rapist, and more pending cases is being sold as the nation's saviour, republicans are in a cult.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,204
- Reaction score
- 131,782
You admitted to not reading my other answer to you, so there's no point in taking any effort to inform you how stupid you are to everyone informed on the issue.
