- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 8,132
- Reaction score
- 10,014
I don't know why you are "but Trump"ing me, I asked about Harris/Walz. I'm not voting for Trump, never have.
RFK supporter?
I don't know why you are "but Trump"ing me, I asked about Harris/Walz. I'm not voting for Trump, never have.
@Strychnine one more chance to let the board know your understanding of a photo you've been spamming across multiple threads for many weeks, as well as your level of caring if it's genuine or photoshopped.
We're dying to know if you think it's real or fake.
Choose one:
A---You believe it's real and Matt Marquardt of the NIT would never lie to you and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you think it shows Trump in a negative light and will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance
B---You believe it's a photoshop and Matt Marquardt presented it as such and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you wish Trump looked this haggard always and you believe it will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance and you want to convince people that Trump looks this haggard always
If it's not a shoop, posting it repeatedly to mock a person's physical appearance portrays a poster interacting from a place of insecurity and weakness.
If it is a shoop but you're unaware, same is true PLUS your ability to recognize altered photos of extremely famous and prolific photography subjects is shown as embarassingly bad.
If it is a shoop and you're aware, same is true but to double the extent, and it's disappointing and embarassing that you'd feel so involved in the political discussions here to feel the need to flop that thing around so frequently.
Investigations been done for a while, so spare me the "good luck".
Any interest in letting the board know where you stand on this photo?
I never said it only hurt black communities, I said it disproportionally hurt black communities which is absolutely true. I think you know this but are being disingenuous and trying to find a racism where one doesn't exist. It's a boring predictable tactic.
No interest in interacting with me eh. I know you have a rich history of bravery but your cowardly behavior here is pretty shameful, and your blasé spamming of that picture warrants an explanation, bud
On some issues, but he has a major flaw when it comes to his blind support of Israel.RFK supporter?
So after mentioning Trump not once but twice while asking your question, you are wondering why he mentioned Trump in his answer? It’s almost like people evaluate candidates directly against who their opponent is.I don't know why you are "but Trump"ing me, I asked about Harris/Walz. I'm not voting for Trump, never have.
weird to be so upset over a photo.@Strychnine one more chance to let the board know your understanding of a photo you've been spamming across multiple threads for many weeks, as well as your level of caring if it's genuine or photoshopped.
We're dying to know if you think it's real or fake.
Choose one:
A---You believe it's real and Matt Marquardt of the NIT would never lie to you and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you think it shows Trump in a negative light and will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance
B---You believe it's a photoshop and Matt Marquardt presented it as such and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you wish Trump looked this haggard always and you believe it will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance and you want to convince people that Trump looks this haggard always
If it's not a shoop, posting it repeatedly to mock a person's physical appearance portrays a poster interacting from a place of insecurity and weakness.
If it is a shoop but you're unaware, same is true PLUS your ability to recognize altered photos of extremely famous and prolific photography subjects is shown as embarassingly bad.
If it is a shoop and you're aware, same is true but to double the extent, and it's disappointing and embarassing that you'd feel so involved in the political discussions here to feel the need to flop that thing around so frequently.
Investigations been done for a while, so spare me the "good luck".
Any interest in letting the board know where you stand on this photo?
It was a very specific question that neither of you have answered. Feel free to answer it, and then differ to Trump if that is your prerogative.So after mentioning Trump not once but twice while asking your question, you are wondering why he mentioned Trump in his answer? It’s almost like people evaluate candidates directly against who their opponent is.
Your question is do I think Harris/Waltz will be running the country if they win? Kind of a dumb CT type question to begin with. They’ll run it just as much as any other president/VP has ran it.It was a very specific question that neither of you have answered. Feel free to answer it, and then differ to Trump if that is your prerogative.
Trump specifically has said Black/Hispanic jobs, so tell me how without just saying empty words or without me having to infer what he's trying to say. You saying that illegal immigration disproportionally hurts the black communities means what? Say how and why you all have definite thoughts on the black communities and their jobs, I would think the man who advocates being the best president for black people since Abraham Lincoln can clearly articulate and explain the threat to the black community and their jobs because of illegal immigration.
Ok, here's the deal and this is FINAL . I posted an image from a linked news orgainzation. Whereas if the image has been manipulated or not is not up to me.
![]()
- Published on January 27, 2024
- by NIT Publisher
![]()
Donald Trump ordered to pay his rape victim $83.3 million - NorthIowaToday.com
NEW YORK CITY - Donald Trump, a self-described very stable genius, turned a $5 million loss to his rape victim into a $83.3 million loss, as ordered by a jury yesterday in his sexual assault and defamation case with E. Jean Carroll.northiowatoday.com
Sorry, it's just not up to me. It's just not.
If you simply MUST find out if the image has been manipulated or not, please contact the publisher that I have linked above. If you do find that it has been manipulated, please contact the publisher as I just found the image on the internet and put it in my post.
This is my final post on this subject as we've derailed the thread enough already.
If you do find through your investigation and contact with the publisher that the photo has indeed been manipulated, please engage with the publisher for any remittance due to any harm you may have perceived you've suffered.
Have a nice day.
THIS IS FINAL.
You have rapedar? Like the gays have gaydar?look at that fat old tub of shit. there's no way that's photoshopped. it looks exactly like him. i know a rapist when i see one.
Does anyone supporting this DNC ticket actually think Harris/Walz will actually be running the country if they get into office?
Like I get it, if you hate Trump then you have the "anything but Trump" angle, but are people actually excited about this ticket thinking they will be the ones making real decisions?
I'm not voting for Trump. . . . .So you feel so much better with Trump/Vance running the country. Actually, just Trump, as he pretty much said VPs mean nothing. The same president who shared classified documents with the Russians in an Oval Office meeting. The same President who left the White House with hundreds of classified documents claiming they were declassified by using just his mind. The same President who showed classified documents to random people who happened to be in the room at the time at Maralago like it was show & tell time.
The same former President who went to the Supreme Court to get presidential immunity so that he could do the job, where 46 others did not need such a thing to do the same job they were elected to do.
I feel far more fearful of Trump/Vance than I do Harris/Waltz.
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/15/5285...ormation-to-russians-during-white-house-visit
Speaking of shame, what was your previous account name, guy who joined in 2023?If you don’t like people calling out rigged investigations, quit pretending to believe them. You still pushing the collusion delusion or the piss tapes or is that too embarrassing even for a political forum moderator? You have to have some shame, right?
Have you considered having a good cry about it?He’s a troll that connived his way into a moderator position, same as several other of the political posters (all left wing, no nepotism there). He's a garbage poster, let alone mod. Notice how much the other garbage left wing guys get away with. If you get annoyed, just remind yourself of how pathetic his life is that he lashes out like that.
You have rapedar? Like the gays have gaydar?
What’s up with him softening his stance on electric vehicles bc Elon is supporting him?Trump goes rogue and doesn't always follow the orders of the oligarchs that are really running the country.
He’s a troll that connived his way into a moderator position, same as several other of the political posters (all left wing, no nepotism there). He's a garbage poster, let alone mod. Notice how much the other garbage left wing guys get away with. If you get annoyed, just remind yourself of how pathetic his life is that he lashes out like that.

While simultaneously pissing off the "drill baby drill" big oil supporters he has. Good example of him going rogue. Obviously for vain reasons, but results in a much more balanced position on energy as a result, even if what got him there were the wrong reasons.What’s up with him softening his stance on electric vehicles bc Elon is supporting him?