No, that's not required for what I'm looking for and no, you didn't.
I'd like to see the context in which they posted it since it sounds like they posted it under the premise it's an unedited photo and you believe it's an unedited photo.
Am I correct?
@Strychnine one more chance to let the board know your understanding of a photo you've been spamming across multiple threads for many weeks, as well as your level of caring if it's genuine or photoshopped.
We're dying to know if you think it's real or fake.
Choose one:
A---You believe it's real and Matt Marquardt of the NIT would never lie to you and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you think it shows Trump in a negative light and will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance
B---You believe it's a photoshop and Matt Marquardt presented it as such and you post it repeatedly even in the same thread because you wish Trump looked this haggard always and you believe it will convince other board members he's a poor candidate due to physical grossness and/or you get pleasure from publicly mocking people's physical appearance and you want to convince people that Trump looks this haggard always
If it's not a shoop, posting it repeatedly to mock a person's physical appearance portrays a poster interacting from a place of insecurity and weakness.
If it is a shoop but you're unaware, same is true PLUS your ability to recognize altered photos of extremely famous and prolific photography subjects is shown as embarassingly bad.
If it is a shoop and you're aware, same is true but to double the extent, and it's disappointing and embarassing that you'd feel so involved in the political discussions here to feel the need to flop that thing around so frequently.
Investigations been done for a while, so spare me the "good luck".
Any interest in letting the board know where you stand on this photo?