• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

'Crying?' No, just pointing out the fact that Trump can't be Hitler because Trump is a capitalist and Hitler was a socialist.
Then why is Trump's VP on record calling Trump Hitler. '
Still cant believe Trump's campaign could be so dumb as to make his VP a guy who called him American Hitler.
 
Bringing up past statements that someone has said is definetely quoting them.....

No, you.

Typically when someone quotes someone, they say "Quote" at the beginning and "End Quote" at the end.

That's a hint for what a quote is.
 
You don't have to wonder, I'm acknowledging her even having those types of career positions and how she presents herself, but you seem like you have evidence of her failing upwards, so please explain specifically how Kamala kept failing upwards, without anyone calling her out, without using rightwing propaganda talking points. I'll even give you Willie Brown, then after that?
How does she "present herself"? Even democrats acknowledged that how she "presents herself" is embarrassing and phony until 2 weeks ago when you were all told to do a complete 180, and of course you all did.

Failing upward means you do a bad job and continue getting higher offices anyway, which is how it works in California. Gavin Newsom and Harris both trashed San Francisco, then jumped right up to AG to trash the rest of the state, and Newsom failed up to governor to trash the state further, Harris was a trash DA, failed up to being a trash AG to see a crime increase, failed up to senator, ran in the primary and failed out of that before the Iowa caucus, so was appointed VP, put in charge of the border to oversee the worst border crisis we've had, then they yank the guy with dementia out and install her as the candidate without a single vote.

Pretty clear you just don't know what failing upward means, because Newsom and Harris are both textbook cases.


 
What struggle does Kamala identify with?

She's the daughter of two college professors, raised by her Indian mother. Moved to Canada when she was 12 until graduating high school.
Can we guess she lived in nice areas throughout her live before attending the University of California and Howard Law?

So.... what struggle?
the struggle of dealing with retarded right wingers. I think most of us can relate to that struggle.
 
No, you.

Typically when someone quotes someone, they say "Quote" at the beginning and "End Quote" at the end.

That's a hint for what a quote is.

Did Trump refer to minorities as "rabid" or "animals" in the past?

Also, when she asks him about the Obama birther shit, is that not asking him about his previous quote?
 
The one who also didn't have a goddamn thing to do with black Americans?

Those are the "black candidates", ladies and gentlemen. People who qualify under the one drop rule and never even met a black American until they were adults. Private school in Montreal, private school in Hawaii, and to this day I doubt Obama has ever met a black person who made under $200k. Christ, I have more of a connection to black America than these 2 frauds and I'm as white as the day is long.

From a decade of screeching “he’s lying he’s secretly a Kenyan muslim!!”

To “he never even met a black person!”

You guys really are identity politics Goldilocks
 
I don’t agree they are equally stupid. One is looking to attack a person based on their race. It’s cleaned up a bit nicer that it isn’t seen as racism but the end result is someone is attacked for their racial identity and are in a framed narrative of having to explain themselves for their identity. It’s bullshit. This was happening to Haley from the left during the primaries a bit as she was being framed as a self hating Indian trying to be white. All this stuff does is 1) keep race focused discussions in politics 2) make it more difficult for a person to run for office if their race isn’t as common or more complicated in some way.

With that said, I already stated in another post racial pandering isn’t good. It’s not the level of this and if we are on board with trying to get these pointless racial discussion out of politics, the better idea would be to criticize racial pandering while then making an issue about whether x politician somehow represented their race(s) correctly enough during their career. I mean, listen to how fucked up that sounds. “Was Kamala acting black or Indian enough at every point of her political career?” There isn’t a real answer to that because it’s not the point. What they want to happen is this bullshit subjective narrative arguing about it, where anyone can show a headline or clip when she was presented as one way or the other and claim victory over who knows what. It’s gross and needs to go away.
Race-baiting and racial pandering are both stupid. They both need to go away. I don't care if you're a purple alien from Saturn. Are you a good representative of the people who voted you into office or not?
 
Oh poor little Kamala.

<DCrying>
She's currently in the position of the #2 most criticized person in the world, and running to be the #1 most criticized person in the world, and she's facing criticism.

How will she get over it and press on?

{<BJPeen}{<BJPeen}{<BJPeen}{<BJPeen}{<BJPeen}

Sheesh you could at least pretend she's thick-skinned.

Bud you have been posting about her at an autistic rate all week you can’t talk about anyone’s skin till you go outside and touch a blade of grass
 
Last edited:
How does she "present herself"? Even democrats acknowledged that how she "presents herself" is embarrassing and phony until 2 weeks ago when you were all told to do a complete 180, and of course you all did.

Failing upward means you do a bad job and continue getting higher offices anyway, which is how it works in California. Gavin Newsom and Harris both trashed San Francisco, then jumped right up to AG to trash the rest of the state, and Newsom failed up to governor to trash the state further, Harris was a trash DA, failed up to being a trash AG to see a crime increase, failed up to senator, ran in the primary and failed out of that before the Iowa caucus, so was appointed VP, put in charge of the border to oversee the worst border crisis we've had, then they yank the guy with dementia out and install her as the candidate without a single vote.

Pretty clear you just don't know what failing upward means, because Newsom and Harris are both textbook cases.


You gotta work on your grammar. I know my grammar is god awful but your sentences are so clunky, it gives the impression that you are using google translate.

That being said, weren't you whining about how brutal that Harris was as a prosecuter when it came to punishing crime and now you are complaining that she was not hard enough?

Make up your mind on what you stand for. You act like some sort of repressed middle aged drag-queen that is unable make up their mind about what they are.
 
Honest question. Do you think Trump has 5 years left?
Absolutely, my dad is 87 and has never once had any of the comforts of being a mega millionaire his whole life. He smoked cigarettes from the age of 18 until he was in his 70s, never much of a workout guy, hardly played much sports regularly, so yeah I do.


Dude is 78, eats like shit, always raging, which is not good for the blood pressure, not very active, and fat. When you see photos of him without his make up on, he looks God Awful.
I don't watch news and I generally avoid tabloid trash talk about people I actually do like, and I don't like Trump, so you do the math. I'll take your word for it though.

How many years do you think 78 year old Trump has left. 10 or more or 5 or less?
I couldn't tell you. Mel Brooks is still around at age 98. We just saw fitness instructor/ health guru Richard Simmons pass away at 76.

I don't do dead pools and I had Leon beating Belal so my Nostradamus skills arent all that sharp.
 
Back
Top