• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

I keep seeing “Harris meets with Netanyahu” is Biden just not doing anything anymore?

KJP said Biden is fine… lol



It’s unreal… nothing but lies from this admin

Biden
Mayorkas
Kirby
KJP
Harris

I don’t think they’ve told truth about anything in years…

“Cheap Fakes”… all of them are
 
It's not that I have you wrong, Rob, it's that you're essentially claiming you'll consider voting for Harris so long as she toes a very obvious GOP social and political policy position on one of the most contentious issues imaginable lmao
Is considering an abortion protection law up to 18 weeks a conservative stance?
 
Briefs? Wait… commando??

<{clintugh}>
6o562HG.gif
 
Is considering an abortion protection law up to 18 weeks a conservative stance?
Is rejecting the current abortion "status quo" (which she very obviously does lmao) an "abortion free for all"?
<surebuddy>
 
Is rejecting the current abortion status quo (which she very obviously does lmao) an "abortion free for all"?
<surebuddy>
Like I said, if she doesn’t push for complete up to point of birth abortion then I think there is common ground to be had.

Do you think there should be any restrictions on abortion at all?
 
Like I said, if she doesn’t push for complete up to point of birth abortion then I think there is common ground to be had.

Do you think there should be any restrictions on abortion at all?
Well that's kind of weird because you were just talking about how you like things the way they are now, you know, with the SC blowing abortion rights to smithereens lol
Something isn't adding up here,
 
I hope they keep pushing that narrative. It’s funny because Trump’s team seems desperate to avoid it, even to the point of training republicans on how to (publicly) respect people like normal human beings, but their dumb shit candidate can’t help himself.

I doubt they'll pull it off. DEI is their latest boogeyman term for what the other side does. They have a new one roughly every election cycle.

During the Obama administration, it was "Cultural Marxism." Obama was a Cultural Marxist so he hated the US, hated the West, was trying to undermine it. His staff were all Cultural Marxists, etc., etc.

Last election it was "globalists." So Trump was a patriot nationalist and the libs were all globalists that wanted a New World Government and were going to allow UN tanks to roll into your town and impose martial law or whatever.

This time around it's DEI. DEI madness is what brings trannies to libraries, any time a nonwhite person does something they don't like, it's DEI that put them in that position, DEI is what made the Little Mermaid black, etc.
 
Well that's kind of weird because you were just talking about how you like things the way they are now, you know, with the SC blowing abortion rights to smithereens lol
Something isn't adding up here,
Yeah my man, keep up. I think fundamentally it’s a states rights issue, which is what we have now.

I would compromise on a federal law for protections in an effort to put the politically football behind us.

I would ideally limit it at 12-14 but open to 16-18. 18+ for life of the mother.

Is that making more sense?
 
Yeah my man, keep up. I think fundamentally it’s a states rights issue, which is what we have now.
And if Harris follows this train of thought (which she super duper doesn't lmao) you'll consider voting for her lol
 
And if Harris follows this train of thought (which she super duper doesn't lmao) you'll consider voting for her lol
Did you just completely ignore the second half of my post? The one about compromise and openness to a federal law for protections?
 
Did you just completely ignore the second half of my post? The one about compromise and openness to a federal law for protections?
You said you'd consider voting for her if there wasn't an "abortion free for all", I was skeptical, you said that means keeping things the way they are, and Harris very clearly does not support keeping things the way they are lol. So no, you aren't considering voting for Harris, but rather trying to virtue signal as reasonable and concilliatory while setting an impossible, easily dismissable standard lol
 
You said you'd consider voting for her if there wasn't an "abortion free for all", I was skeptical, you said that means keeping things the way they are, and Harris very clearly does not support keeping things the way they are lol. So no, you aren't considering voting for Harris, but rather trying to virtue signal as reasonable and concilliatory while setting an impossible, easily dismissable standard lol
So yes you completely ignored me.

Maybe third times the charm.

I think this is a states rights issue.

However, I would be open to a federal law for protections.

Ideally this is 12-14 weeks. I’d be open to hearing 16-18. 18+ only in case of the mothers life.

If Harris ran on that, I’d not consider that a “abortion free for all” which is to say “abortion up to the point of birth”.

Is that legislation something you’d consider?
 
I doubt they'll pull it off. DEI is their latest boogeyman term for what the other side does. They have a new one roughly every election cycle.

During the Obama administration, it was "Cultural Marxism." Obama was a Cultural Marxist so he hated the US, hated the West, was trying to undermine it. His staff were all Cultural Marxists, etc., etc.

Last election it was "globalists." So Trump was a patriot nationalist and the libs were all globalists that wanted a New World Government and were going to allow UN tanks to roll into your town and impose martial law or whatever.

This time around it's DEI. DEI madness is what brings trannies to libraries, any time a nonwhite person does something they don't like, it's DEI that put them in that position, DEI is what made the Little Mermaid black, etc.
Since the DEI VP is such a VIP, we should work with BLM and LGBTQ to force CRT into schools, ASAP. - Adrian Cronauer
 
I doubt they'll pull it off. DEI is their latest boogeyman term for what the other side does. They have a new one roughly every election cycle.

During the Obama administration, it was "Cultural Marxism." Obama was a Cultural Marxist so he hated the US, hated the West, was trying to undermine it. His staff were all Cultural Marxists, etc., etc.

Last election it was "globalists." So Trump was a patriot nationalist and the libs were all globalists that wanted a New World Government and were going to allow UN tanks to roll into your town and impose martial law or whatever.

This time around it's DEI. DEI madness is what brings trannies to libraries, any time a nonwhite person does something they don't like, it's DEI that put them in that position, DEI is what made the Little Mermaid black, etc.
Wrong
Dei is the unfair placement of unqualified personnel based on skin color, gender or flavor of the day “minorities” - it’s certainly not based on merit
That’s why it rubs people wrong
Like Harris , like the newest SCOTUS judge Brown, like that abomination Levine, like etc
As long as it hits the virtue signal mark
As long as it’s a straight white male being displaced, it’s all good under DEI
Everyone knows it
 
Back
Top