• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

Majority of MaGA voters will vote anyway even if Donald will be naked and show tongue in TV.

However today IMHO if voting had been done Kamala had won.
If Donald will continue to show how old and senile he is. Amazingly stuff they used against Biden now is working against Donald.
That ain't how the US voting system works. US polls also seem bizarrely in accurate.
 
@BFoe just scrolled up. That’s silly when a “grand wizard” makes an endorsement. Obviously they are beyond reprehensible. I simply meant that clown show hasn’t been relevant for decades
 
I don't disagree with anything you just said but I'm not sure "fairly sound" is what you want to aim for when it comes to election security.

Ballot harvesting could be many things. From somebody filling in their mum's ballot because she's not gonna vote anyway, to somebody going to a nursery home and collecting ballots and filling them in.
These outliers can always exist, you think a mailman has the time and the resources to fill in all those ballots for a president that doesn't know of them? It would have to take some deep state underground effort of mailmen to actually make a significant change there.

I'm not 100% opposed to all absentee voting, but I think it should be the exception not the rule. If you're in your state on election day and physically able you should go out to vote.
Here's the thing though, I am sure that most people that can go and have the time to spend waiting to go generally go in person to vote. But, it can be an hour long wait during the eveninings and not everyone has time to spend like that. So restricting absentee ballots and requiring proof of inavailability seems like unneccesary hurdle to the process.

IDs is simply a no brainer, I don't think speculation about people who might keep complaining is relevant at all.
Don't really have an issue with it too but as I mentioned, there would have to be some insanely coordinated deepstate scheme to pull off some election fraud on a impactful scale because they can detect repeats and they have safeguards in place as I mentioned. Like 3/4 of the states in the United States require IDs already too so there is that.

The machines are a completely different issue altogether. Sure, you can argue that no solid evidence has been found of rigged machines, but the risk and results of one single breach from just 1 bad actor are enormous. I don't think it's worth the risk.
Sure, then how do you want people to vote? On paper, you could argue that the vote counters or whoever the fuck can erase and change votes behind the scenes. So there is that premade excuse.

I feel like you're approaching this entire thing from a perspective where many republicans bring up this issue in bad faith, so you're inclined to take that into account when discussing the topic. It should be pretty simple, the elections can be made more secure, so they should be made more secure.
The best arguement is required nationwide IDs but then people will complain that it is possible to make up a bunch of fake IDs and more excuses will pile on. There were virtually zero republicans contesting of the legitmacy of elections back in 2016 and absentee voting has been a thing for decades so its hard to take the MAGA crowd seriously with their selective interest in the ethics of voting fraud when they lost. But thats just my 2 cents.
 
Lol I don’t need a break from the internet, I just need right wing memes to be smarter and funnier.

You fall and hit your head? You, forget who right-wing memes are aimed at, always use the K.I. S.S. theory for them. Know your audience. ..?
 
Dick Cheney is just as irrelevant. He hasn’t held office in decades, and I’m not even sure if the guy goes outside anymore. Cheney is a black-hearted evil son of a bitch, but I’ll take an endorsement from him over the friggin Klan any day. Goodness gracious.
Harris mentioned him by name in the debate , not that irrelevant
 
Looks like Joe Manchin is now saying he cannot endorse Kamala over saying she will fight till end the filibuster.

I think it is pretty interesting because many see him as a centrist, a lot of moderates seem to identify with him. So if he is raising a red flag, might turn off some potential swing voters

 
Wow.

You do realize that Donold said he'd let Pres. Putin "Do whatever the Hell he wants.", right?

Wow.

You do realize that Donald held Putin to a big zero previously. Meanwhile under Obama and Biden he took Crimea, Donbass, and more. I'm going to guess that you are taking Trump wildly out of context making today Tuesday.
 
Back
Top