- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
- Messages
- 18,578
- Reaction score
- 5
Lets put this to bed. Your average judoka is nowhere near the efficacy or athleticism of your average wrestler. At least in the US. There are a few amazing Judo players, but nowhere near the consistency USA Wrestling has.
This is because wrestling is scholastic, and judo is a hobby. Scholastic sports start sooner and cost almost nothing. Its all numbers. Even if we assume there is the same ratio of mediocre-to-elite athletes, wrestling by virtue of participation pumps out far more of them.
Since they start younger, they learn the rigors of training at a young age. Judo still attracts a fair amount of less-than-stellar athletes thanks to the kata kool-aid and the prevalence of pot bellies.
Two wings of the same bird. Grappling's grappling. If you're good at one you'll generally have the skills to take up and succeed in another.
But generally speaking, your average wrestler is better at what they do than your average Judo player. I've been playing Judo for 8 years now, and I have no problem admitting as much.
Ditto. I was never athletic enough to be good at wrestling, but I was probably slightly above average athleticism among competing judoka back when I fought a lot of Judo tournaments. The level of athleticism, dedication, and time on the mats is almost always much lower for US judoka than US wrestlers. I imagine the situation would be reversed in a country like Japan where Judo is scholastic and many of the best athletes commit to professional Judo careers from a young age.