- Joined
- Jun 13, 2014
- Messages
- 13,293
- Reaction score
- 10,057
Yep..
....still digging...
....still digging...
How effective is the rhythm method for birth control? The rhythm method is effective 75% of the time. It isn't as effective at preventing pregnancy as other methods, such as taking birth control pills or using an intrauterine device (IUD).
Rhythm Method: Birth Control, Calendar & Effectiveness
Cleveland Clinic
You are trying to ManSplain how a woman measures her period cycles and tell women they are wrong. Do you understand why that is stupid.
Again this is how the women measure their periods:
- Period ends yesterday, beginning next ~28-30 day count to her next period
- 42 days now pass and the women does not see her period, but as that is quite common for her to go past that date she is not concerned yet
SO once again when you read the above, taken as the way an ACTUAL WOMAN, and not you, take it, are you saying that woman should have expected two periods in the time frame I HAVE LISTED ABOVE and not the one, women, in fact expect?
Yeah I didn’t think I was going to care about this thread or really read it, but that dildo really brought the lolsBecause birth control is 100% effective, right?
You're on a roll here, I'm subscribed to the thread!
@PainIsLIfe make it real simple for me and just put your timeline down here of when her Period 1 would fall and then Period 2 :
Woman completes her period today (Oct 03)
- She should expect her period ~this many days _________ after the completion of her Oct 3 period taking us to the Date of ____________
- She should expect her second period ~this many days _______ after the completion of her Oct3 period taking us to the Date of __________
Make the dates work so we see how you show, within 42 days her expecting and having 2 periods, as you keep saying she should expect, and i will ask @fingercuffs to check your work and knowledge of female biology.
Damn, you sound like a virgin
Im confused. Can I make two babies per month?
I'm manspalaining to you guys that the day a period starts is day 1 of her cycle and day 28 is avg end of it.
And if women are counting there cycle by the day their period ends then thy are doing it wrong - those are facts, not opinions.
I've also had to explain to several posters that when a women conceives (at the end of 2nd week in cycle) that the baby (I'll go with zygote fr you guys) is only going to be 2weeks gestational at day 28 of the woman's cycle.
I'm not sure why all of this is so hard to grasp, but I imagine it is because the left likes to twist facts to make their argumets emotionally valid.
I have two kids. Right now most of us are wondering if youve even touched a woman.Yes. Twins or 2 mothers.
Do you really not how this works?
The Absurd Pregnancy Math behind the Texas 'Six-Week' Abortion Ban
The law the Supreme Court just failed to block is not just a blow to women; it’s biologically nonsensicalwww.scientificamerican.com
It hard to grasp because it is stupid.I'm manspalaining to you guys that the day a period starts is day 1 of her cycle and day 28 is avg end of it.
And if women are counting there cycle by the day their period ends then thy are doing it wrong - those are facts, not opinions.
I've also had to explain to several posters that when a women conceives (at the end of 2nd week in cycle) that the baby (I'll go with zygote fr you guys) is only going to be 2weeks gestational at day 28 of the woman's cycle.
I'm not sure why all of this is so hard to grasp, but I imagine it is because the left likes to twist facts to make their argumets emotionally valid.
He won't read that as that entirely debunks his menstrual math ManSplaining and his ability to keep telling ladies they are tracking their periods wrong. Something that has become popular to do with Incels, who are certain they can understand women's biology better than women, and dictate to them, despite having never touched a woman.The Absurd Pregnancy Math behind the Texas 'Six-Week' Abortion Ban
The law the Supreme Court just failed to block is not just a blow to women; it’s biologically nonsensicalwww.scientificamerican.com
I have two kids. Right now most of us are wondering if youve even touched a woman.
You should be spending a lot less time posting and a whole lot more reading on female biology, Chachi.
He claims his wife is a doctor.Damn, you sound like a virgin
Did you not notice, that article is mocking people like you, who think a woman can track her own cycle by other than menstruation?A lot of that confirms what I've said, but I take 1 small exception - it is interchanging gestational cycle with this 'menstrual cycle pregnancy' (40 weeks). If you you want to use the menstral cycle as the starting point then a baby doesn't have a heart beat in the 6th week of pregnacy.
a baby develops a heartbeat in weeks 7-8 when counting by periods.
Says the clown getting battered around mansplaining menstrual cycles.Most of you are dumbasses so....
It hard to grasp because it is stupid.
It is laughable seeing you own your mansplaining and think you are correct.
Women tracking their periods from the end of one to the beginning of the next IS THE BEST AND EASIEST WAY for them to identify a pregnancy risk. it is time honoured and a good way to do it.
You saying there's a more technical way to do it, because technically the period is not the exact date of fertility, when the woman would not be able to KNOW or TRACK what you are indicating normally is just the height of stupid mansplanning.
Anyway now Manspain how a women would go about tracking it the way you say instead women should track it?
How are women tracking 'conception' in your mansplaining world?If you have a regular 28-day cycle, the expected missed period should happen two weeks after conception
...