- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 29,347
- Reaction score
- 4,929
It was bipartisan but your master told you it was not good
Honestly it was better than the then current situation, but not a good solution.
Last edited:
It was bipartisan but your master told you it was not good
I repeat, never learn. The Democrats did nothing wrong. They enacted no radical policies at all, and were greatly disliked and shit canned for no reason whatsoever.
Oh', and if you're gonna call it the "bipartisan" border bill, you must also realize that it was shut down in a bipartisan manner as well. Did Trump get to the Democrats too?
Flores-Ruiz and his attorney were seen openly walking through a public hallway, with a DEA agent even riding the elevator alongside them — meaning federal agents had every opportunity to detain him if they had proper legal authority.
there is no evidence she actively interfered with federal enforcement efforts.
Importantly, allowing Flores-Ruiz to leave through a different courthouse door was standard practice meant to maintain order and safety. Judges often direct individuals to use non-public exits to prevent chaos, ensure courthouse security, and avoid unlawful seizures
I'd call the police. Don't take any chances.Brown people!!!!!!!!!! I see brown people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
If men in girls dressing rooms is an issue for you why would you vote trump?Boys playing girl's sports; in their dressing/restrooms. Damn near open borders. Providing millions in housing and money to immigrants. Not addressing the debt (Trump isn't either). Gaslighting the public about Biden's cognitive decline.
Lol, why you lying through omission? She said their paperwork did not allow them to make arrests on the premises and they should go talk to the judge. Its really sad to see you guys eat up these manufactured crisis over and over again.According to the article she misdirected the ICE team. Thats more than just allowing the guy to use the side door.
Not Trump. He was allowed to self surrender. In fact, he was given a whole bunch of perks and his supporters still played victim and whimpered about “two tiers of justice.”She was treated like every other person in the US. Oh, the horror.
They didn't have an arrest warrant, they had an administrative one. She was under no obligation to assist them with the arrest and in no way does letting the guy leave through a different door amount to obstruction under any federal criminal statute.
You're about a step away from going full Ahmaud Arbery on this one.
this has been explained before. i can't believe you dorks are trusting google AI to be accurate with legal information lol.Seems that she interfered with a legal arrest. This is Google AI result for what is an administrative warrant:
- Example: ICE Administrative Warrant:
ICE uses administrative warrants, often signed by an immigration officer, to document authority for arrests related to immigration violations, but these warrants do not allow entry into private residences without consent or a judicial warrant.
"Newly released court documents reveal that Judge Hannah Dugan did not obstruct justice as federal prosecutors allege.
Flores-Ruiz and his attorney were seen openly walking through a public hallway, with a DEA agent even riding the elevator alongside them — meaning federal agents had every opportunity to detain him if they had proper legal authority.
However, ICE was operating under an administrative warrant, which imposes no legal obligation on state courts or judges to assist. Judge Dugan acted fully within her rights by insisting on a judicial warrant, and there is no evidence she actively interfered with federal enforcement efforts.
Importantly, allowing Flores-Ruiz to leave through a different courthouse door was standard practice meant to maintain order and safety. Judges often direct individuals to use non-public exits to prevent chaos, ensure courthouse security, and avoid unlawful seizures — especially when federal agents are present without a proper judicial warrant. In this case, Judge Dugan was simply protecting the legal process and safeguarding everyone’s constitutional rights, not aiding an escape.
As many of us knew, this was a political stunt by the Trump administration aimed at intimidating judges, but it’s already backfiring both legally and politically.
A dismissal now seems highly likely, and even if the case proceeds to trial, the strong constitutional and procedural defenses overwhelmingly favor Judge Dugan."
Got eem lolIf men in girls dressing rooms is an issue for you why would you vote trump?
And you think its okay for her to lead them in 1 direction and then try to sneak their fugitive out in a different direction?Lol, why you lying through omission? She said their paperwork did not allow them to make arrests on the premises and they should go talk to the judge. Its really sad to see you guys eat up these manufactured crisis over and over again.
The issue isn't merely whether it's ok or not; it's whether it's illegal or not.And you think its okay for her to lead them in 1 direction and then try to sneak their fugitive out in a different direction?
If men in girls dressing rooms is an issue for you why would you vote trump?
Not Trump. He was allowed to self surrender. In fact, he was given a whole bunch of perks and his supporters still played victim and whimpered about “two tiers of justice.”
And there certainly were, just not the way they meant it.
this has been explained before. i can't believe you dorks are trusting google AI to be accurate with legal information lol.
The issue isn't merely whether it's ok or not; it's whether it's illegal or not.
Sure, but I expect there's a different and more appropriate process for examining her actions than throwing handcuffs on her and hauling her off to jail, don't you think?This.
But, ethical may come into play since she is an officer of the court.
She didn't sneak him out, lol. Are these looney toons cops?And you think its okay for her to lead them in 1 direction and then try to sneak their fugitive out in a different direction?