- Joined
- Oct 3, 2004
- Messages
- 12,137
- Reaction score
- 5,156
Lol, how patheticThats an ethnic slur.
Mods, please take care of this.
Par for the course though
Lol, how patheticThats an ethnic slur.
Mods, please take care of this.
I bet that your dog doesn't even like youI'll consistently be standing on your shoulders to post from the bottom.
Yeah, let's see:Idoc(R)acy
You're not worth speaking to on a serious level. If you want any sort of respectful response from me, then post with respect at me. Otherwise, this is what you're going to get, me reflecting your style back at you. If you have a problem with it, don't quote me or tag me.Lol, how pathetic
Par for the course though
Nah. My friend's mom (clerk) would say "don't tell me x, I'm supposed to report crimes that I know about".
Lawyers are routinely reprimanded for things not involving actual court cases. Court officers can lose their jobs over a dui, etc.
Your story has nothing to do with whether or not Court officers have different obligations than regular citizens.
Your friend's Mom has nothing to do with whether or not officers of the court forego their Constitutional rights to privacy and silence because of their occupation. Context matters.
And I didn't tell a story. I cited a similar case where had that Trump judge taken literally any action that could have been perceived as keeping ICE from intervening in her case, she could have been arrested in accusation of the same thing. And that Trump judge spoke against the aggressiveness and disregard for procedure of ICE. I mean you can try to suggest a blanket quasi-legal reason they should be allowed to snatch people out of court rooms, and judges should be arrested for trying to prevent that, but it's a dubious argument at best.
I love when you're hours behind the news curve and just owning yourself left and right“I’m not here to defend this judge. … I think she overstepped here." - Renowned Nazi and former Obama ICE Director John Sandweg
![]()
The other judge has a case for rescinding that barring, which was made in reaction to the allegations against him and head-up by political opposition, if the details contained in his resignation letter hold true in Court.
According to our top Sherdog LOLawyer @Darkballs, she broke no laws.Woo boy, this thread is TDS Megathread material. I thought you guys were all about "Nobody is above the law." What changed?
Imagine applying this standard to your president.It's pretty easy to not break the law, especially for a judge...
According to our top Sherdog LOLawyer @Darkballs, she broke no laws.
Several of whom? Sherdog LOLawyers who are never ever wrong? LOLSeveral of us have spelled out exactly how dumb the charges are.
What rebuttal is needed to some LOLawyer on Sherdog saying the AG and FBI is wrong? Maybe you can tweet Pam Bondi, and she'll entertain you...You'd be taken more seriously if you could offer a rebuttal rather than just jerking off in the corner.