No, I said the age difference IS enormous when one fighter is 42 vs 37, but not as bad for 37 vs 31. But you argued that 6 years was enormous and 5 years wasn't enormous, so I pointed out that 1 year doesn't make the world of difference in this argument and that the age of the older fighter matters more than the age gap.
For example, a 35 year old champion shouldn't have an issue fighting a 22 year old contender. Even though the age gap is 13 years, the 35 year old champion shouldn't complain about the age gap. But a 37 year old champion defending against a 42 year old retired fighter IS a huge problem.
You just don't want to accept reality because you're a delusional, blind Jon Jones nuthugger.