He's made weight because he has no legs. You can't deny that his insane reach at 205 isn't a huge advantage, anytime he faces poeple.even close.to his size there were problems. Jon won't have the advantage in this fight though.
Again, I don't see the logic to this argument. If what you're saying were true - that Jon is succesful largely because of his skinny legs and long reach - why don't we have total bean poles dominating every weightclass? These taller/rangier fighters that Jones has had problems with - why aren't they as succesful as Jones? Why isn't Gustafson the clear #2 LHW of all time, second to Jones only because Jones's calves are just a liiiiiitle bit skinner? Hogwash.
DC is a fantastic wrestler because of his extroardinary power, and this is related to his squat physique - yet Jon, who has the opposite physique, showed himself to be at least the equal of DC in wrestling. How is that?
Jon is very obviously more than just reach and a lack of leg meat. Crucially, he is very athletic, he is a fast learner of physical techniques, he is surprisingly strong, he has an incredible chin, he has fantastic fight IQ, etc. etc. These are the qualities that are responsible for Jon's success.
There are PLENTY of human beings with skinny legs and long arms that can't fight for shit. Calling Jones a "size bully" or accusing him of posessing some kind of rarely seen physical attributes that result in his fighting dominance is simply not true, and it just makes Jon seem even better when his haters are so desperate to grasp at these straws to discredit him. As I say, I count myself among the people who think Jon is a shitty human and I root for him to lose every time, so I don't like these indefensible attempts at discrediting him.
There are plenty of good ways to criticize Jones. Invoking bullshit about skinny legs and unfair height/reach just seems desperate.