• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime Joe pardons Hunter

BFoe said:
I definitely don’t agree with your first point, but I agree that’s exactly what Trump and his supporters will say. There’s no evidence of any kind that Miley, Schiff, or Cheney have done anything other than oppose/disagree with Trump. But if someone tries to protect them, Trump will certainly say “why are they being protected if they did nothing wrong?”—when the answer is obviously because he’s threatening them lol. But his supporters will buy it, I’m sure.

This is 100% Trump’s fault. When a person runs a campaign on vengeance and retribution, teases military tribunals and death for Democrats, this is the result. According to Trump, we are a far bigger enemy than any external threat. :rolleyes:
When someone says shit like that, it’s best to assume they mean it.

I agree with you that pardons like these are a bad precedent.
Not as bad a precedent as threatening opponents with death and tribunals, but bad nonetheless.
As far as Trump’s legal problems, the evidence is absolutely overwhelming in the fake elector, classics docs, and J6 cases. If you can ignore all of that and still buy the “they wife just out to get Trump” narrative, there’s probably not much I can say to convince you.
Click to expand...
Agree to disagree. How can you not say that they are not hiding something if the idea of a pardon for them is being floated out there? It just seems like the logical response.

I can understand why you wouldn't want him to go after them and try to find crimes all because he doesn't like them. That would be wrong.
 
jimjamjammer said:
Agree to disagree. How can you not say that they are not hiding something if the idea of a pardon for them is being floated out there? It just seems like the logical response.

I can understand why you wouldn't want him to go after them and try to find crimes all because he doesn't like them. That would be wrong.
Click to expand...
He can say that because his partisanship has made him an imbecile. It’s too bad formal educations don’t encourage critical thinking.
 
jimjamjammer said:
Agree to disagree. How can you not say that they are not hiding something if the idea of a pardon for them is being floated out there? It just seems like the logical response.

I can understand why you wouldn't want him to go after them and try to find crimes all because he doesn't like them. That would be wrong.
Click to expand...
Re: that last sentence, the issue is arbitrarily investigating them without any evidence a crime has been committed. That is certainly wrong, don't you think?
 
Cajun said:
But if no crimes then no need to back date 11 years....Likely he had more in his closet not captured in current. Could be he just didnt want to take the chance that Hunter didnt tell him everything. But you dont issue blanket pardons 11 years for conspiracy imo...
Click to expand...
You do when you have people willing to believe those conspiracies launch investigations on their behalf.

Look at poor Ruby Freeman, who committed no crime but was still stalked, harassed, and threatened by Trump associates—all because of nonsense election CTs.

Hunter is a private citizen. Even if he committed no other crimes, he’ll need some damn good legal representation at a minimum if Trump’s DOJ and FBI launches probe after probe. That shit costs a ton of money, and makes it pretty hard to live life. And this is after we just had a 6-year investigation into the guy!

I’m amazed at people who say they distrust the government, and then when it comes to this they’re like, “Welp, if he didn’t do anything wrong then he shouldn’t be worried, amirite?”
I mean…really?

Blayt7hh said:
The funny part about this is a lot of red states were easier to keep infection rates down in. They are less densely populated and mostly in warmer climates.

But your mistake has been actually reading up on this stuff instead of scrolling X for your information
Click to expand...
Man, the social media thing is depressing. I guess I don’t listen to enough right wing podcasts either lol. America is so fucked as far as the flow of information (and also education) is concerned. It’s going to be really tough to fix that.
 
jimjamjammer said:
Agree to disagree. How can you not say that they are not hiding something if the idea of a pardon for them is being floated out there? It just seems like the logical response.

I can understand why you wouldn't want him to go after them and try to find crimes all because he doesn't like them. That would be wrong.
Click to expand...
Because we just investigated the guy for 6 years and found nothing aside from a lame gun charge and tax shit he already paid back, and had a big House investigation/impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden which yielded no evidence of crimes or articles of impeachment.

That investigation into Hunter was launched by Trump’s DOJ when he was POTUS, David Weiss was appointed by them.
How long do we need to investigate a private citizen when we have no evidence of other wrongdoing?

But CTs!!!! We have to keep investigating, because conspiracies! And if anyone tries to stop it, well, that’s just proof of guilt, right?
That’s a very misguided and dangerous way to think.
 
BFoe said:
Because we just investigated the guy for 6 years and found nothing aside from a lame gun charge and tax shit he already paid back, and had a big House investigation/impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden which yielded no evidence of crimes or articles of impeachment.

That investigation into Hunter was launched by Trump’s DOJ when he was POTUS, David Weiss was appointed by them.
How long do we need to investigate a private citizen when we have no evidence of other wrongdoing?

But CTs!!!! We have to keep investigating, because conspiracies! And if anyone tries to stop it, well, that’s just proof of guilt, right?
That’s a very misguided and dangerous way to think.
Click to expand...
There it is!
 
jimjamjammer said:
That kind of sounds like what the Democrats did to Trump. So I guess he would just be taking a page out of their own playbook. Weird eh
<5>
Click to expand...
Except there’s mountains of evidence against Trump and none against Hunter. Not to mention others have already plead guilty in the Trump investigations. Weird eh

<5>
 
Excuse me if this has been posted before...


Pretty interesting how in sync they are with their lambasting of the evil Trumps desecration of the "rule of law" with the sweet saintly Bidens utter respect for the "rule of law"

Americans now realize there is no Difference whatsoever, unless you are totally brainwashed (a useful audience)

Liars lying for liars. Take a good whiff. If you consume any of this junk, you need to know they (everyone of those people in the clip) think you are morons, sad part is everyone around you now knows it.
 
Lol @ how the same people who boasted that Biden was so great for pledging not to pardon his son now all have these long explanations for why it's actually a good thing that he did.

Every time lmao

Were you lying then or are you lying now?
 
Andy Capp said:
Re: that last sentence, the issue is arbitrarily investigating them without any evidence a crime has been committed. That is certainly wrong, don't you think?
Click to expand...
How do you know there’s no evidence?
 
Sara said:
11, and yes.


They apparently like to pretend it didn’t happen, just like that can’t even be remotely critical of Hunter Biden’s pardon.
Click to expand...

who is they? and i've never seen any posts like this. can you provide some examples? going back like 8 years of course.
 
idrankyourbeer said:
who is they? and i've never seen any posts like this. can you provide some examples? going back like 8 years of course.
Click to expand...
If you don’t know who they are I guess it doesn’t matter.
 
BFoe said:
Except there’s mountains of evidence against Trump and none against Hunter. Not to mention others have already plead guilty in the Trump investigations. Weird eh

<5>
Click to expand...
So, you are saying the Democrat run DOJ had zero evidence against Hunter, decided to arbitrarily go after him, and somehow got him convicted in the 99% Democrat district of Los Angeles?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,128
Messages
58,418,662
Members
176,032
Latest member
clowning

Share this page

Back
Top