Don't know if anyone else has addressed this, or if anyone besides a few people who were in the room with me shared this sentiment but... What the hell? I know it was a bad cut, but I was still a bit upset with what I thought was poor work by his cut man. He put adrenaline and coagulates on it, because at the beginning of each round he wasn't bleeding from it as he had been at the end of the previous round, but the vaseline was non-existent. After he removed the q-tips I saw him take one little dab of vaseline and jam his thumb into Lauzon's cut pulling it open even further. What little vaseline he did use was left on Lauzon's forehead, and as soon as Miller touched him he was bleeding profusely again. Again I know it was a bad cut, and what do I know? Maybe the nature of the cut was such that vaseline would be ineffective, though I highly doubt it. In the moment I thought this was very inept work by the Joe's cut man. I don't take anything away from Jim Miller, I'm not saying "Omg Joe would've won if only..." I'm just wondering if anybody else was annoyed by what seemed to be inadequate work by his cut man?