- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 139,547
- Reaction score
- 43,218
Mmmhmmm
![Diva1 [<diva2] [<diva2]](https://i.imgur.com/MGiu8g2.png)
Mmmhmmm
![Diva1 [<diva2] [<diva2]](https://i.imgur.com/MGiu8g2.png)
Wellthereitisgif..He had no business talking about it. He is a late night talkshow host FFS! He deserved getting canned. Stay in your fucking lane. lol
He was so blinded by his ego he couldn't see how mocking a father that was just slaughtered in front of his wife and children might be a bad thing.
Anyone dancing on the grave of an innocent man or otherwise making light of any such tragedy is asking for it.That's fine, but do you hold the same standards to Republicans who lie about events / things as well?
Anyone dancing on the grave of an innocent man or otherwise making light of any such tragedy is asking for it.
He said a little more than that.He said that MAGA people were opportunistically latching onto the fact that someone who was not one of them murdered another person. Which is a way of pointing out the obvious: each political side expresses outrage and weaponizes the injustices committed by the other against ones own, selectively.
This is not false, or wrong, or disrespectful. It's simply trivial and stupid. Both left and right does it. Saying this is anodyne at worst and I'm very confused as to why he's being fired. He never mocked Kirk or his death, he critiqued the selective political use of his death by MAGA supporters.
Well good cover to cancel something losing money IMO.Well of course that's fine. But that's the apparently not the reason he got cancelled as of yesterday or is it?
Stop lying. He previously explicitly condemned the shooting and gave condolences to Kirk's family. The fact you need to lie just proves how weak your position is.Anyone dancing on the grave of an innocent man or otherwise making light of any such tragedy is asking for it.
He spread the CT that the shooter was MAGA and made him out to be a victim of MAGA propaganda. Then said people were overreacting because Jan6 was a thing.What did he say?
Post some things Kirk said about murdered kids.This kind of insensitivity would be... really insensitive, if it were actually true. But then of course you can't substantiate any change of 'mocking a father that was just slaughtered in front of his wife and children' because that isn't what Kimmel did, is it, you utter fraud, hack, liar and can? Please quote the exact words Kimmel used that 'mocked' Saint Charlie.
I'll tell you another insensitive thing. In the aftermath of a school shooting, saying that a few deaths here or there are the 'price we have to pay' for the freedom that 2A gives us. I mean, that's insensitive as fuck, I'd say. (well, not as insensitive as Alex Jones saying Sandy Hook was a hoax and bereaved parents were crisis actors, which sets the bar pretty high but is still kind of what we expect in terms of the stuff that people like you will handwave away coming from your own side.)
So lets hear your take on Saint Charlie and his utter insensitivity to the victims of a school shooting.
Anyone dancing on the grave of an innocent man or otherwise making light of any such tragedy is asking for it.
Which part of that is "dancing on his grave"?He spread the CT that the shooter was MAGA and made him out to be a victim of MAGA propaganda. Then said people were overreacting because Jan6 was a thing.
Divisive lies. ABC was right to drop him.
Thats NOT what he said at all. He said gun deaths were inevitable, he didn't say he "didn't mind" them. This is the kind of lie that makes people think what happened to him was justified.Was Charlie Kirk innocent? He did say he doesn't mind seeing some gun deaths every year so we can have the second amendment. And those comments came back to haunt him.
Using a guy's death to zing half the population of the country.Which part of that is "dancing on his grave"?
Thats NOT what he said at all. He said gun deaths were inevitable, he didn't say he "didn't mind" them. This is the kind of lie that makes people think what happened to him was justified.
Too early? You do know there's a meme thread here right? You mean it's too early to joke or meme about this guy cos you like him, but fuck your feelings if it's someone you don't..It's probably too early for Kirk memes, but that certainly would be a meaningful one.
He's defending your constitutional rights in that comment. What other rights are you willing to give up?This what he said. Am I right?
“We must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty... We need to be very clear that you’re not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. But I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment,” he said.
The guy even said it's worth it to have gun deaths every year.
Using a guy's death to zing half the population of the country.
By lying about the shooter, yes.By talking about the shooter?
There is no zinger here or dancing on the grave..
"The Maga Gang [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” he said"
Where is the zinger? Where is the dancing?
All I see is a shit opinion, and thats it.
I remember when Americans claimed US is great because free speech.
Not that you ever had it but still...
How time has changed