When they’re threatening to shut you down if you don’t fire a guy? What ever legal case came of it would inevitably end up in the Supreme Court which is stacked on the wrong side of the equation for them.So talk to them?
Produce the clip of him saying exactly thatCharlie Kirk called for Biden to be executed. I guess nobody should defend him, right?
He can talk to dolphinsI can’t wait for TNN. Trump News Netowrk.
![]()
This is a lazy excuse. This same SC has ruled against what you would consider Trump issues before. To consider them compromised just because the majority is not in your favor is lazy. Otherwise, there is no point in taking any case to any court, period. Right?When they’re threatening to shut you down if you don’t fire a guy? What ever legal case came of it would inevitably end up in the Supreme Court which is stacked on the wrong side of the equation for them.
Produce the clip of him saying exactly that
They have, but statistically they side with him, and this is such a hot button, emotional issue I wouldn’t want to take the risk either.This is a lazy excuse. This same SC has ruled against what you would consider Trump issues before. To consider them compromised just because the majority is not in your favor is lazy. Otherwise, there is no point in taking any case to any court, period. Right?
"Joe Biden is a bumbling, dementia filled, alzheimer's, corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and or given the death penalty for his crimes against America."
I'm giving you the quote and not what the interpretation the X poster said.I don't know what your first language is, but in English that is calling for someone to be executed
I'm giving you the quote and not what the interpretation the X poster said.
Sorry that is hard for you to deal with.
Ah, c'mon dude. You've shown yourself to be a pretty knowledgeable guy on these boards. SCOTUS has ruled against Trump issues before. I remember MAGA dopes pissed off at Barrett especially, pretending she is "ungrateful" or something stupid like that. I appreciated her sticking to her guns. Yes, it's a conservative majority, but let's not pretend they are some slam dunk for any and every issue Trump's side brings to them.They have, but statistically they side with him, and this is such a hot button, emotional issue I wouldn’t want to take the risk either.
plus, think of the money they lose while they aren’t broadcasting as they fight this thing in court. The risk isn’t worth it
Im by no means thinking it’s a slam dunk, it could be 60/40 or 45/55 but the conservative slant is there. It’s a broadcasting network, profits come first. I can’t imagine them taking the gamble on fighting it and winning, all while patiently waiting to broadcast again.Ah, c'mon dude. You've shown yourself to be a pretty knowledgeable guy on these boards. SCOTUS has ruled against Trump issues before. I remember MAGA dopes pissed off at Barrett especially, pretending she is "ungrateful" or something stupid like that. I appreciated her sticking to her guns. Yes, it's a conservative majority, but let's not pretend they are some slam dunk for any and every issue Trump's side brings to them.
I'm going through 11 pages what did the Dumbass say?
What Jimmy Kimmel said about Charlie Kirk
"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger-pointing, there was, uh, grieving on Friday − the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this.
Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief: construction. Demolition, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend; this is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish, OK? And it didn't just happen once. "And then we installed the most beautiful chandelier. Responses you wouldn't believe." Who thinks like that, and why are we building a $200 million chandelier in the White House? Is it possible that he's doing it intentionally so he can be bad about that instead of the (Jeffrey) Epstein list?
![]()
What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk? Watch the monologue
Jimmy Kimmel said supporters of President Trump were \www.usatoday.com
olberman called for trump to be assassinated. kirk said biden should be executed for his crimes. huge difference. obviously that would happen after a trial, etc.Charlie Kirk called for Biden to be executed. I guess nobody should defend him, right?