- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 29,461
- Reaction score
- 19,875
Robinson was anything but MAGA though, which is why he killed Charlie Kirk for being MAGA. It's kinda an important part, even if you want to say that's what Kimmel really meant and just accidentally said something that could been seen as Kimmel calling Robinson MAGA.This needs to be repeated...
Kimmel did not imply let alone say that Robinson was MAGA.
What he said was that MAGA people had been characterizing Robinson as anything but one of them trying to score points against their opponents.
Which means, plain and simple, that MAGA is using everything about Robinson that is against their own views ("see, this murderer is a woke, trans loving, leftist") as a way to use Kirk's death for ammunition against the left.
That's what he said.
Is it a good point? No it's banal, since the left does the same with its selective outrage, calling everyone who does something against one of their own a Nazi, fascist, white supremacist, racist, whatever. Kimmel was reiterating the platitude that the right is now weaponizing bad things that happen against their own to draw political capital against the left. Well, duh. It is true, but trivially so, since it is a ubiquitous phenomenon.
But it's not a mockery of or offense to Kirk's passing in any way, let alone something that warrants cancelling a guy.
In any case, even if he had said that Robinson was MAGA, that would be empirically wrong at worst, but it just doesn't make sense. "They pretend he wasn't one of them but he is!" Is that what people think Kimmel said? If you do, you need to go back to school for reading comprehension.
Some people here have been lobotomized by their biases.
"MAGA folks notice leftists want to murder them" isn't the story, and you know very well that even under this interpretation Kimmel framed it this way instead of simply commentating on the recent discoveries about Robinson's life because that would look bad on the left.