Sorry, but has any low rated show firing was ever explained as "they suck and don't bring views"? Even Joy Reid, that had an audience pretty much consisted as Fox News writers to gather material, didn't get this justification.
Thing is I can't find videos of Kimmel saying MAGA did it.
He DID say that MAGA is so desperate to find clues indicating that they DIDN'T do it. That's not the same thing. I understand it's somewhat adjacent but it seems like he's making fun more of their desperation to clear themselves and indict the other side, than he is accusing anyone of any particular crime.
And even if he was yeah, that would be dumb because the shooter was clearly a leftist, I still don't think he should get canned because of that. And even if he was outright lying, it's still the company's choice, shouldn't be the FCC.
Any time anything happens, like 95% of the people in this sub-forum do the same thing. They latch on to anything that will absolve whatever side they like and indict the one they don't. And the people who call that out--- I mean, that's pretty tame.
I'm trying to think of a right-wing equivalent. Imagine if someone got fired for saying that George Floyd wasn't murdered, that he just OD'd on Fentanyl. Imagine if the Biden admin said they were going to make sure that person was fired. If you think that Jimmy Kimmel deserves to get fired for this, then you'd have to agree that someone would absolutely deserve to get fired for saying that.
And all of this is besides the point because the biggest issue is that the government was glaring at ABC and Disney, and they folded. And who wouldn't? That's why the government should have no say. Free speech has to reign. Now if a company says "What so-and-so said doesn't align with our beliefs, blah blah blah," that's a different sin and one that should be discussed. But it is a DIFFERENT sin.
And as much as I detest people who do so, the people celebrating Kirk's death have a constitutional right to do so. They're shitty people, yeah. But the 1st Amendment must be protected because if they are denied their right to say awful things--- I could ostensibly be denied the right to say good or true things-- and that is the descent into hell. You have to examine any kind of restriction and ask yourself "what is the worst, most detrimental manner in which this could be used against ME?" We have to tread carefully. The pendulum swings back and forth. Those in power now will be at the mercy of those over whom they currently have power.
As an addendum, threats and direct encouragement of violence are exceptions to this. If someone says "Get this person next" or "I'll take one for the team and get Shapiro" in the wake of an assassination, that person should at the very least be spoken to by authorities.