• We are requiring that all users add Two-Step Verification (2FA) to their accounts, as found here: https://forums.sherdog.com/account/security Within one week, we will automatically set this up, so please make the necessary arrangements. Reach out to an admin if you encounter issues, and we apologize for any inconvenience.

Opinion Jake Shields is now a wanna be far right political activist

- If USA population is mixigened. How can they advocate White supremacy?
 
Rod1 said:
No, sons of sex slaves were considered legitimate.

Mehmed II conqueror of Constantinople was born out of an slave for example.

And there was no racial component, slavery happened out of conquest like its quite common.

Its in our genes to protect our offspring not treat them like cattle after fucking their mom.
Click to expand...

I meant that the sons of slaves that didn't belong to the master were still slaves and slaves were often traded/given to others as gifts - Chattel.

Arab slavery was more centered on religion than race, African and Native American slavery on tribalism. Saying that it was done based on skin color doesn't make it any more despicable than saying it was done because they belong to the wrong tribe.
 
LmpwZw
 
PainIsLIfe said:
I meant that the sons of slaves that didn't belong to the master were still slaves and slaves were often traded/given to others as gifts - Chattel.
Click to expand...
The sons of slaves and muslims were considered muslims and thus freemen.

Male slaves were sent to the salt mines to be worked to death, there was no intergenerational component to slavery like Vikings "thralls" and even thralls rarely had more than 2 generations of slavery.

American slavery was 100% based on race, if you don't seem to grasp the difference between conquering a people and outright denying their humanity and treating them like cattle which was NOT common, especially in the fucking late 1800s, i can't really know what else to tell you.


PainIsLIfe said:
Arab slavery was more centered on religion than race, African and Native American slavery on tribalism. Saying that it was done based on skin color doesn't make it any more despicable than saying it was done because they belong to the wrong tribe.
Click to expand...
Yes it does, because religion and tribe is not something inherent on anyone, you conquer a people and raise their kids as your own tribe/religion, you marry a slave and while the mom may not be part of your tribe/religion, your kids will certainly be.

Race based slavery was not your regular historical slavery, it was outright treating slaves as sub humans whose right to be enslaved was coded in their genes.

Its not comparable and its anti-natural, the other types of slavery are pretty consistent with human nature to dominate, assimilate and reproduce, the American one was definitively not natural.
 
Last edited:
fingercuffs said:
What does this mean?
Click to expand...
Cut a piece of bamboo in half. You will see stringy fibers with a yellowish hue.

I think the initial reply was in regards to the conspiracy theory about the ballots in Maricopa County Arizona containing bamboo fibers insinuating Chinese involvement in us election fraud.
 
it's been a while since i've seen two threads about the same thing actively being posted in and not being merged in here.
 
Rod1 said:
America had chattel slavery based on race where people were born into slavery only because of the color of their skin.

The notion of having sex with a woman and then disowning your kids as they are treated like cattle is so pervasively evil that you really require some twisted ass mind to achieve. As father of two i just can't comprehend that shit.
Click to expand...

And today their descendents (from the kids that they didn't own as property) dismiss the problem of absentee fathers as a black cultural problem without the self awareness to know that it was their great great great great grandpappy that started it.
 
Madmick said:
So are progressive leftists. Aren't you all up in the Israel threads relentlessly whining about the Israeli lobby influences on international and American foreign policies?

You can couch it in more refined, socially acceptable discourse, but I suspect your viewpoints on all of that align. So where is the part where he's not just anti-Jew, but a full-blown Neo-Nazi? Where's the opinions authored calling for a pure white America? You realize that's what white nationalists openly proclaim is their virtuous goal, correct?
Click to expand...
Israel is a nation.

I think there is a distinction between having issue with a countries national policies and having issue with people or individuals because of their faith (or other social constructs)
 
Lol at white purity tests. What is this, the 90s? Or even the early 2000s?

The far right nowadays is ok with being mostly whites, and even a few, clearly nonwhites, as long as they're chauvinistic, xenophobic, hate multiculturalism, etc.

In fact, far right nonwhites are extremely popular. See? This black guy thinks affirmative action is bullshit too!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AdamWarlock
Opinion choosing between harris/dems & trump/gop is like asking if you wanna get poisoned or shot
10 11 12
Replies
236
Views
5K
Koro_11
Koro_11

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,252,276
Messages
56,511,166
Members
175,260
Latest member
BoobsandPie24

Share this page

Back
Top